Did someone say factory freak?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 09-01-05
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Did someone say factory freak?
OMG, Well me, Merc, and Cvenom2122 went to the dyno today and ran our cars.
I have an 06 SS with a 2.5 magnaflow Exaust. Other then that its stock performance wise. Well I was mightly surprised when I hit this # on the dyno!
Mustang dyno #
Merc has an 05 SS with an intake and I dont remember his #'s but they where like 242 I think.
My brother Cvenom has a 04 redline and has intake and a 3.0 inch exaust with no resinator and put down 246. needless to say I am VERY happy, now I will get intake, stage 1 and 2, and I will be good to go
I have an 06 SS with a 2.5 magnaflow Exaust. Other then that its stock performance wise. Well I was mightly surprised when I hit this # on the dyno!
Mustang dyno #
Merc has an 05 SS with an intake and I dont remember his #'s but they where like 242 I think.
My brother Cvenom has a 04 redline and has intake and a 3.0 inch exaust with no resinator and put down 246. needless to say I am VERY happy, now I will get intake, stage 1 and 2, and I will be good to go
Senior Member
Joined: 11-20-05
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Kingsville, MD
i double dog dare you to go post that on the srt forums.
jk, then the bad ones of the group will migrate over here. nice #'s
BUT, may i ask what kind of dyno it was? there are such things as factory freaks but what are the chances of there being 3 of them dyno at the same shop on the same day? that seems a little high even for a factory freak. do you know what any other cars (stangs, camaros etc) average dyno #'s are on that particular dyno?
jk, then the bad ones of the group will migrate over here. nice #'s
BUT, may i ask what kind of dyno it was? there are such things as factory freaks but what are the chances of there being 3 of them dyno at the same shop on the same day? that seems a little high even for a factory freak. do you know what any other cars (stangs, camaros etc) average dyno #'s are on that particular dyno?
Member
Joined: 11-29-05
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by helty
i double dog dare you to go post that on the srt forums.
jk, then the bad ones of the group will migrate over here. nice #'s
BUT, may i ask what kind of dyno it was? there are such things as factory freaks but what are the chances of there being 3 of them dyno at the same shop on the same day? that seems a little high even for a factory freak. do you know what any other cars (stangs, camaros etc) average dyno #'s are on that particular dyno?
jk, then the bad ones of the group will migrate over here. nice #'s
BUT, may i ask what kind of dyno it was? there are such things as factory freaks but what are the chances of there being 3 of them dyno at the same shop on the same day? that seems a little high even for a factory freak. do you know what any other cars (stangs, camaros etc) average dyno #'s are on that particular dyno?
but i did it as informative....not bashing 
Senior Member
Joined: 11-20-05
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Kingsville, MD
Originally Posted by SRTurbo
I already did..... but i did it as informative....not bashing
but i did it as informative....not bashing 
but honestly, dont those #'s seem high, even for a factory freak? and doesnt it seem like a coincidence that all 3 dyno'd at over 240whp? and on top of that Mustang Dyno's usually put out lower readings than a Dynojet or other dyno's. Im not trying to call BS or bash the guys car, but that just seems too good be true, to me anyway.
Member
Joined: 11-29-05
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by helty
link? they're gonna go nuts over there
but honestly, dont those #'s seem high, even for a factory freak? and doesnt it seem like a coincidence that all 3 dyno'd at over 240whp? and on top of that Mustang Dyno's usually put out lower readings than a Dynojet or other dyno's. Im not trying to call BS or bash the guys car, but that just seems too good be true, to me anyway.
but honestly, dont those #'s seem high, even for a factory freak? and doesnt it seem like a coincidence that all 3 dyno'd at over 240whp? and on top of that Mustang Dyno's usually put out lower readings than a Dynojet or other dyno's. Im not trying to call BS or bash the guys car, but that just seems too good be true, to me anyway.
Senior Member
Joined: 11-20-05
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Kingsville, MD
Originally Posted by SRT-4Scott
Wow...dynos don't lie. That is if it wasn't off. Anyways, nice numbers.
Senior Member
Joined: 11-24-04
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1
From: newark, DE
Originally Posted by helty
true, and theres always the possibility of it being out of calibration. i hope for this guys sake its accurate, that would be awesome. just seems a little too freakish.
Senior Member
Joined: 11-20-05
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Kingsville, MD
Originally Posted by cvenom2122
the only reason i know this dyno isnt bull, is because they had a mustang GT dyno sheet laying around and he only made 225 whp stock 
:
:again guys, not calling BS, dont take it personal. but having 3 super factory freaks at the same dyno on the same day? you can see why it would raise some eyebrows.
Senior Member
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Good numbers, but you can't say that your 06 is a factory freak, because the two other cars ran some nearly equals results.
I think I can explain something about your high numbers. I saw on your dyno sheet; the weight is 3250. On my own dyno tests we used, we entered 3000 lbs. The more weight you enter, the more the dyno is "impressed" and says : Wow that heavy car is strong, thus resulting in higher numbers.
But since the Mustang dyno is precise, the entered weight cannot fool it and the one you used calculated an acceleration time of 14.5 @ 99 MPH for the quarter mile, a realistic time for a Cobalt SS/SC with a replaced exhaust.
:O)
I think I can explain something about your high numbers. I saw on your dyno sheet; the weight is 3250. On my own dyno tests we used, we entered 3000 lbs. The more weight you enter, the more the dyno is "impressed" and says : Wow that heavy car is strong, thus resulting in higher numbers.
But since the Mustang dyno is precise, the entered weight cannot fool it and the one you used calculated an acceleration time of 14.5 @ 99 MPH for the quarter mile, a realistic time for a Cobalt SS/SC with a replaced exhaust.
:O)
New Member
Joined: 10-20-05
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Theres just no way thats accurate. Mustang dynos give much lower numbers than dynojet. Theres no way your making 250 on a mustang dyno, thats closer to 300 on a dynojet, thats 350 at the motor. Theres just no way.
Plus, those HP numbers don't line up with 1/4 mile times that are only trapping 100. I don't know why there off, but they are.
BUT, you could solve it all by getting to another dyno. If you really believe in your numbers, that shouldn't be a problem and you'll want to back them up. Or atleast race some car with HP numbers close to those.
Plus, those HP numbers don't line up with 1/4 mile times that are only trapping 100. I don't know why there off, but they are.
BUT, you could solve it all by getting to another dyno. If you really believe in your numbers, that shouldn't be a problem and you'll want to back them up. Or atleast race some car with HP numbers close to those.
Senior Member
Joined: 11-24-04
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1
From: newark, DE
I made 225 whp and 230 tq with just an intake i added 3" cat back exhaust no resonator and sropped my torque to 219 and gained some hp EVOLUTION MOTORSPORTS is on here ask him if the dynos are bull
here is my first dyno ever
2nd run car was at 200 + degrees
here is my first dyno ever
2nd run car was at 200 + degrees
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 09-01-05
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
mercury's car sounded the best all intake sounds awesome!!!!!!!!! inside garage Venom's car sounded like a civic lol and mine was all exhaust so the stock whine really isnt impressive
