General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

G5 GXP possabillity??

Old Mar 30, 2008 | 02:37 AM
  #1  
Delta2.2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 09-13-06
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 0
From: USA
Question G5 GXP possabillity??

well the new cobalt ss turbocharged is out now and that leaves me wondering a lot about pontiacs g5. i wonder if pontiac will even continue it/recieve a turbocharged version of it later.

according to the 09 cobalt changes article, the 2.4 is being dropped and the "Sport" is discontinued. and the 2.2 LAP vvt is the only engine possible on LS/LT models aside from the 2.0 turbo in the SS (more info go here for changes https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...40#post2137540)

if these changes are correct, i really wonder how pontiac's G5 will be effected by this.

does anyone have any inside info on what the future of the G5 really is, and if a GXP model with the turbo is underway at all?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 02:39 AM
  #2  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
as long as it doesnt turn out like the g6 gxp....
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 02:45 AM
  #3  
sschevy25's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-14-07
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
you know im not even sure....but i'd actually like to know this too...
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:20 AM
  #4  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
whats wrong with the new g6 gxp?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:25 AM
  #5  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by shawn672
whats wrong with the new g6 gxp?
Have you seen it? It's ugly as ****. Here, lemme give you a sample.



Not to mention it's essentially a 2007 GTP with a bumped up price and no stinking manual transmission, even though they said one would be available.

No G5 GXP chance, by the way. This is GM we're talking about. SATURN gets the LSJ. CHEVY gets the LSJ. GM's PERFORMANCE division, Pontiac, gets nothing.

Don't even get me talking about how GM has thrown Pontiac out the ******* window. I'd rant for hours.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:29 AM
  #6  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
/shrug actually i really like it
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:33 AM
  #7  
sschevy25's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-14-07
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
even though this is not relevant to this thred....im liking that g8.... pontiac is making i know that!
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:33 AM
  #8  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
g8 is hot, gto meets luxury
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:35 AM
  #9  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by shawn672
/shrug actually i really like it
The only thing wrong with it is this: we all bitch about the use of the SS badge, "ZOMG the 2.4 should have never had it blah blah," I think some Malibu got it, too. GM's like, oh okay, we'll stop being slutty with what was a once highly regarded moniker, and only put it on our performance Chevrolet vehicles. Then they turn to Pontiac and say, haha no one cares about you so we'll start whoring out "GXP" like there's no tomorrow. G6 - let's go bugs bunny style! A non-functional ram air hood! A big ass hammerhead spoiler! Ahh, but of course, the same 3.6 with 252 hp hauling a big ass car with no manual transmission that we gave you performance fans in the 2007 GTP.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:39 AM
  #10  
cruisn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-30-06
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 2
From: Onoway
they werent selling any G5 gt's so putting the 2.4 in them was useless when for 2-3 grabd more you ge tthe sc/ or now turbo setup. there was not a lot of interest in the G5 GT's either, rarely see any, most dealers dont even stock a GT. There is 3 other g5 gt's that I know about all 2007 and newer, mine is the only "pursuit" floating around my area.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:42 AM
  #11  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
actually ss=gtp

hence why they removed the g6 gtp, and replaced it with the gxp

gxp=wannabe gtp
kinda like
ss2.4=wannabe ss/sc
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:42 AM
  #12  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by cruisn
they werent selling any G5 gt's so putting the 2.4 in them was useless when for 2-3 grabd more you ge tthe sc/ or now turbo setup. there was not a lot of interest in the G5 GT's either, rarely see any, most dealers dont even stock a GT. There is 3 other g5 gt's that I know about all 2007 and newer, mine is the only "pursuit" floating around my area.
Lots of G5 GT's in Southern Alberta. Nearly matches the number of 2.4 balts I see.

Originally Posted by shawn672
actually ss=gtp

hence why they removed the g6 gtp, and replaced it with the gxp
gxp=wannabe gtp
kinda like
ss2.4=wannabe ss/sc
That doesn't make sense since the GTP and GXP have the exact same drivetrain, at least the Cobalts are different. And there is no GTP at all for anything anymore, top trim for Pontiac is GXP, so SS = GXP.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:45 AM
  #13  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
all they did was replace the GXP with the GTP, just a name difference
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:46 AM
  #14  
cruisn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-30-06
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 2
From: Onoway
[QUOTE=Acey;2137715]Lots of G5 GT's in Southern Alberta. Nearly matches the number of 2.4 balts I see.


well that doesnt make sense, there are barely any up here. honestly I have seen no more then 8-10 GT's in the past 5 months. lots of bases now though
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:51 AM
  #15  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by shawn672
all they did was replace the GXP with the GTP, just a name difference
Which would have been fine in itself, but for the G6 they also decided to add an ugly front fascia and rear hammerhead spoiler and skirts and non-functional hood. The generally accepted definition of rice is non-functional parts/added bling without any performance increase. Thus, sadly, the 2008 Pontiac G6 GXP = factory rice.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:52 AM
  #16  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
the same can be said about the High Rise on the SS's...factory rice. it happens /shrug

to each their own
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:53 AM
  #17  
cruisn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-30-06
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 2
From: Onoway
Originally Posted by Acey
Which would have been fine in itself, but for the G6 they also decided to add an ugly front fascia and rear hammerhead spoiler and skirts and non-functional hood. The generally accepted definition of rice is non-functional parts/added bling without any performance increase. Thus, sadly, the 2008 Pontiac G6 GXP = factory rice.
LOL. I saw one driving around town. looked twice. thought to myself "that poor car got mutilated by its owner" pulled up to the dealership.... saw it in the showroom.... WTF?!?!?!
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:57 AM
  #18  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by shawn672
the same can be said about the High Rise on the SS's...factory rice. it happens /shrug
Agreed, I don't like the high wing either but I'm not trying to be annoying here I just wanna make sure my point is clear.... they put the high wing on the SS/SC's from the beginning. They put the aforementioned stuff on the existing '07 G6, upped the price and changed the name, that's the ricey aspect of it. Not to mention that in a race, G6 drivers will get an excellent view of that wing.

But I actually love G6's. I'm looking for an 06 or 07 coupe as my next car. So if you're a G6 fan I am too, just not the GXP.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 04:03 AM
  #19  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
meh g6 isnt a racer, but the ss/sc is barely above the g6 as far as performance

any car where the battery comes in the trunk...is going to be quick
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 04:08 AM
  #20  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by shawn672
meh g6 isnt a racer, but the ss/sc is barely above the g6 as far as performance

any car where the battery comes in the trunk...is going to be quick
Yeah G6 GTP/GXP against SS/SC's are very close, with the edge to the Cobalt from what I understand. G6 interior > Cobalt interior, though. Sat in both.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 04:09 AM
  #21  
cruisn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-30-06
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 2
From: Onoway
ya, the g6 wins on that for sure.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 04:13 AM
  #22  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
ss/sc's and the new turbo's are FAST but, in the end, they're still economy cars i wish the t/c was about 25k and had a lot nicer interior
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 04:16 AM
  #23  
cruisn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-30-06
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 2
From: Onoway
i would honestly be happier with jsut nicer seats. seomthing that actually would hug you instead of being built fr your average fat person. I slide all over my seat and I weight 150lbs, they should somewaht be hugging me...
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 04:19 AM
  #24  
Acey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-02-07
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by shawn672
ss/sc's and the new turbo's are FAST but, in the end, they're still economy cars i wish the t/c was about 25k and had a lot nicer interior
That's why, IMO, you should be able to then step up to a midsize performance coupe from GM. The G6 isn't horrific in that regard, but it could be better. *cough cough bring back the 6-speed manual*
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 04:22 AM
  #25  
shawn672's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-07-07
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
must be nice to have the ability to drive a MT, ever lived in seattle?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 PM.