General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

sts turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #1  
plyboy-illest's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (woodbridge)
sts turbo

what do you guys think of this kind of turbo...

and you think it would work on our cars if they would make one...

www.ststurbo.com
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #2  
Halfcent's Avatar
I'm old school
 
Joined: 02-16-05
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3
From: Nashville
The design is sound. However, the idea is to provide for a turbo where under-hood space is not available. Thats not the case in the Cobalt. You don't want your plumbing to be any longer then it needs to be. Too much heat and loss.

Last edited by Halfcent; Sep 13, 2006 at 10:22 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #3  
plyboy-illest's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (woodbridge)
Originally Posted by Halfcent
The design is sound. However, the idea is to provide for a turbo where under-hood space is not available. Thats not the case in the Cobalt. You don't want your plumbing to be any longer then it needs to be. Too much heat and loss.
so your saying its not a good idea?

Last edited by Halfcent; Sep 13, 2006 at 10:23 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 09:44 PM
  #4  
patathSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-05
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: OP, KS
I drove a STS turbo 5.7 GTO. Car was wicked. I didn't notice any serious lag.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #5  
CloudyDaysBehind's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-17-06
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Searched around on some -body sites, and it works really well. I also found an article on Chevy High Performance
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...mounted_turbo/

its nice because you reduce operating temps up to 500 F, so you don't need a turbo timer.

I'd rather just have a turbo in my engine bay though. It looks cooler :-)
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #6  
plyboy-illest's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (woodbridge)
plus some of those 1\4 miles they have on that site for some cars are some serious #'s
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
plyboy-illest's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (woodbridge)
Originally Posted by CloudyDaysBehind
Searched around on some -body sites, and it works really well. I also found an article on Chevy High Performance
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...mounted_turbo/

its nice because you reduce operating temps up to 500 F, so you don't need a turbo timer.

I'd rather just have a turbo in my engine bay though. It looks cooler :-)
yea it look cooler but you already have the SC in the bay its good to have the turbo tucked away...
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #8  
RJSS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-06
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Waterford, MI
Even though the plumbing would be longer than tucking the turbo under the hood I think having it run cooler would be great. Also, we already have the supercharger to provide the low end and only really need the turbo on the max rpm end. I think it would be awesome to put a really small pulley on the supercharger, like a 2.6 or something to spool up quick, and put a turbo the size of your head in the back. Also since we have the single exhaust all the plumbing could be run on the passenger side of the vehicle. It would be really expensive but it would also be sweet to have a cobalt that makes 15psi at like 2000rpm and 35psi at 6500 rpm. It's fun to dream, isn't it?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 08:59 AM
  #9  
plyboy-illest's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (woodbridge)
Originally Posted by RJSS
Even though the plumbing would be longer than tucking the turbo under the hood I think having it run cooler would be great. Also, we already have the supercharger to provide the low end and only really need the turbo on the max rpm end. I think it would be awesome to put a really small pulley on the supercharger, like a 2.6 or something to spool up quick, and put a turbo the size of your head in the back. Also since we have the single exhaust all the plumbing could be run on the passenger side of the vehicle. It would be really expensive but it would also be sweet to have a cobalt that makes 15psi at like 2000rpm and 35psi at 6500 rpm. It's fun to dream, isn't it?
everything could happen nothing is a dream.... as long as your willing to put the time and money into it nothing is a dream...
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #10  
RJSS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-06
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Waterford, MI
I guess I should have clarified...I'm married. So yes it still is a dream
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 09:07 PM
  #11  
RJSS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-06
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Waterford, MI
She is already scared senseless of the balt right now. And I haven't done anything except make the SC louder.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #12  
Clmbngfrk18's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-05
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Oxford,MA
its a cool idea if they came out with one and hahn wasnt any time soon id buy it

id like to know what it would sound like they just replace teh muffler and since a turbo muffles the sound would all you hear is the turbo whineing at high rpms??
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 09:22 PM
  #13  
p7x's Avatar
p7x
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-15-05
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
STS systems have proven to be effictive and produce good power with minimal lag consider the location of the turbo. I just think a convertional system would be better.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #14  
06cobaltls's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-18-06
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: marion ohio
that would make the ultimate 2.2 sleeper for sure
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2006 | 04:53 AM
  #15  
EmperorJJ1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 09-03-06
Posts: 19,376
Likes: 32
From: OR
lol sign me up... i liek the idea of a sc/turbo system especially if the turbo runs cooler and it like said above it would make a good sleeper... ill just take off that wing and the ss badges and putas wont know the difference
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #16  
codyss's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 05-12-05
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
The systems that they make for the GTO and F-Bodies not only look out of place but they can't hold a candle to a real well designed turbo system.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2006 | 09:53 AM
  #17  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
Originally Posted by 06cobaltls
that would make the ultimate 2.2 sleeper for sure
Yeah it would. That would be kick ass.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
Dec 11, 2022 04:47 PM
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
patooyee
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
50
Oct 15, 2015 05:11 PM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
footballplaya3k
Parts
6
Sep 30, 2015 09:39 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.