General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

What u think faster ss/sc with g85 or 06 mitsubishi eclipse mivec v6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #1  
06CobaltssOrange's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-25-06
Posts: 2,704
Likes: 0
From: New York
What u think faster ss/sc with g85 or 06 mitsubishi eclipse mivec v6?

what one do u think would be fast the cobalt ss/sc with g85 or 06 eclipse mivec v6?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #2  
CobaltBurst's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A.
ss/sc... raced a new eclipse At the track and it ran a 14.9
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #3  
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-05
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
From: South Bend , Indiana
Ive only come across 1 of the new v6 eclipses . I was stock at the time and had it by a 1/2 car from a dead stop .
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #4  
philco_3's Avatar
Proud Playstation 3 Owner
 
Joined: 02-16-05
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 0
From: Red Bud, Illinois
My friend has one a new V6 Eclipse. He says give me a month and then we'll go... I want to now damn it!!!
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #5  
SS4ME's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
Drivers race! Just because someone ran a 14.9 in it does not make the Cobalt faster! I saw a chick run a 15.9 against me. It was pretty obvious she could not drive!
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #6  
Shanman's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 06-21-06
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: NM
the old eclipses w/ the turbo were faster stock,also looked better than the newer ones by my opinion, by the way does any one know how to tighten the accelerator, sometimes i get a lil heavy on the gas and dont even know it i just have always liked a firm pedal if u know let me know
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
FLCobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 1
From: florida
i always thought they were faster.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #8  
06CobaltssOrange's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-25-06
Posts: 2,704
Likes: 0
From: New York
hey

yea i was j/w because there is a kid who wants to race me 1/8th at our track lol so imma have fun
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 01:29 PM
  #9  
l Sh1ft l's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-24-06
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 0
From: Canton Ohio
Theres a dude who has one around here. Clean as hell. I don't know if his paintjob came stock, but it is orange and black. Mainly orange but it looks really nice. Hopefully he doesn't have something I don't know about under the hood.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2006 | 01:33 PM
  #10  
05YELLOWSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-05
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
From: Pope AFB, NC
hmm, new eclipse, ugly, and slow because they are a frickin tank....
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #11  
gocanucksgo's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-06
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Langley, BC
the Eclipse has 268hp and it's slower than the Balt? huh?

and if you race a STOCK V6 eclipse, with a bunch of tuning and goodies on your car...and only win by 1/2 a length...I would say the Eclispe is faster Stock to Stock...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #12  
CobaltBurst's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A.
please dont ressurrect dead threads... how do you people find them? and the eclipsed weighs alot more, and what kind of TQ? its not just HP vs HP its TQ too...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 02:08 PM
  #13  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by gocanucksgo
the Eclipse has 268hp and it's slower than the Balt? huh?

and if you race a STOCK V6 eclipse, with a bunch of tuning and goodies on your car...and only win by 1/2 a length...I would say the Eclispe is faster Stock to Stock...
Re-read his post:
Originally Posted by SilverSS/SC
I was stock at the time and had it by a 1/2 car from a dead stop
SS/SC has the power-to-weight advantage, so yes, stock for stock with equal drivers it should be a touch faster than the GT IF the GT is a manual. If it's an auto, then the SC gains a much larger advantage both because of gearing and because of the extra 66lbs.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 02:45 PM
  #14  
g5mike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 0
From: Moncton Newbrunswick Can.
Well considering NJHK just bought one im sure hell chime in on this one soon
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #15  
Chevypowered's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-05-05
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by gocanucksgo
the Eclipse has 268hp and it's slower than the Balt? huh?

and if you race a STOCK V6 eclipse, with a bunch of tuning and goodies on your car...and only win by 1/2 a length...I would say the Eclispe is faster Stock to Stock...

Eclipse weighs 3,600 lbs, i beat one in my SS/SC when i had a couple small things done and i beat it pretty bad everytime.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #16  
yallabalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: Carriere, MS
I think they are about the same. That is just my two cents though. I drove both when I bought the Cobalt. The eclipse did take off a little quicker in my opinion.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WhineSSbaby
Problems/Service/Maintenance
3
Sep 1, 2020 12:39 PM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
Oct 21, 2015 07:04 AM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
Cptnslo
Complete Cars
9
Sep 24, 2015 09:32 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 AM.