INTENSE-Racing.com Intense Racing is a proud Supporting Vendor

Congratulations to Craig McLuckie!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #1  
Bad GTP's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Westerville OH
Congratulations to Craig McLuckie!

Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 02:11 PM
  #2  
Allshot's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 13,079
Likes: 0
From: San Leandro, CA
Thats not bad Hp and torque for a 2.8. Did you guys custom tune his for his other mods?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 02:14 PM
  #3  
PlaysWitCars's Avatar
Former Cobalt Owner
 
Joined: 11-28-05
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 1
From: Charles Town, WV
Damn thats the same mods I have....guess i need to get a tune since mine ran rich at top end. Mine was 242hp with 235tq
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #4  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
What's up with the AFR dip at 6,000rpm?
Those are nice numbers!
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
chipsgt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
From: The East Coast
Love that nice flat tourque curve!
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 02:53 PM
  #6  
Tomtwtwtw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 5,489
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Why only dyno to 6500? I thought Intense upped it to 7000 now? Otherwise, good numbers...defintely would have gotten a better hp number had you run it to 7k.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #7  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
Anyone know what happened to the AFR at 6,000rpm? Looks like a nasty dip.
Those are great numbers either way.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #8  
Bad06SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-10-05
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis
Those are good numbers! It's interesting to note the torque differences with the different pulley sizes.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 03:40 PM
  #9  
Bad GTP's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Westerville OH
Anyone know what happened to the AFR at 6,000rpm? Looks like a nasty dip.
These cars have the most sensitive MAF sensors of any we've ever worked on, and we've now tuned ~ 3,000 cars.

Any aftermarket intake system makes it MUCH more difficult to get the air/fuel curve nice and flat. The 'dip' you've pointed out reaches 11.5:1, which is only 0.3:1 from our target of 11.8:1 (or 2.5% away from what we consider to be ideal).

The factory's air/fuel curve is no where near this good on these cars.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #10  
Mines_Better's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-20-05
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
From: North Dallas, TX
man i need a tune from someone, i dont know of anyone in texas...
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 03:55 PM
  #11  
CTCOBALTSSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-21-06
Posts: 7,917
Likes: 2
From: CT
Originally Posted by Bad GTP
These cars have the most sensitive MAF sensors of any we've ever worked on, and we've now tuned ~ 3,000 cars.

Any aftermarket intake system makes it MUCH more difficult to get the air/fuel curve nice and flat. The 'dip' you've pointed out reaches 11.5:1, which is only 0.3:1 from our target of 11.8:1 (or 2.5% away from what we consider to be ideal).

The factory's air/fuel curve is no where near this good on these cars.
You're right. Even the stage 2 fuel curve sucks. Check mine out.
The numbers look great. I didn't know an intake would affect things so much. Thanks.

Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 04:04 PM
  #12  
automobiliben's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-13-05
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Naperville, IL
Why didn't you raise the rev limiter to 7k????
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #13  
Highhp's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Congrats Craig
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kenhebe
Pictures & Videos
8
Oct 18, 2008 11:23 PM
Bad GTP
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
20
May 17, 2006 04:04 PM
Bad GTP
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
17
May 17, 2006 02:46 PM
Bad GTP
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
2
May 17, 2006 01:39 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.