Pictures & Videos Your pictures, photoshops, and videos.

400whp 35r dyno vids and pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #51  
DebadgedBALT77's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-22-06
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
From: nowheresville
Originally Posted by Bumpin Balt
35 psi on stock motor? Good idea bonehead! lol. He probably has to pedal it to hook up as it is, WTF would be the point of searching for more power? So he can buy tires twice as often? This site makes me laugh!!!
its not that hard to drive a high HP car with out roasting the tires. think about it.

and why would you want more power? Well, when you throw some 24.5's on it and you want to shave some more tenths off, youll finally understand.

Originally Posted by elecblue06
and what are you going to do about keeping the power on ground? no 252 isn't impressive but it's decent on 7 psi.. don't get all butt hurt because that turbo was still a shitty choice. even at 30 psi you would be able to get the same amount of HP on less boost and have an earlier spool.. unless you are looking to push 600+ whp, which is restarted considering 500 is enough to run 10's. I do know the turbo isn't working hard. but considering how much boost you have to throw at your car to get that WHP it's just stressing the engine more for no reason/ and there are a bunch of people in this thread WHO HAVE turboed their car that say it's a bad choice..
i think hes doing just fine with the 35r. but, unless he has plans to build the motor, i belive a 3076 would have been a much better choice. but im not saying hes in the worng with the 35R, i just dont know his build plans.

Last edited by DebadgedBALT77; Mar 15, 2010 at 11:59 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #52  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by DebadgedBALT77
its not that hard to drive a high HP car with out roasting the tires. think about it.

and why would you want more power? Well, when you throw some 24.5's on it and you want to shave some more tenths off, youll finally understand.



i think hes doing just fine with the 35r. but, unless he has plans to build the motor, i belive a 3076 would have been a much better choice. but im not saying hes in the worng with the 35R, i just dont know his build plans.
well like i said above unless he's going for 600+ whp (which is kinda silly) then there are other turbos that would have fit better.. now if he's going for 600 whp then thats a different story
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #53  
DebadgedBALT77's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-22-06
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
From: nowheresville
Originally Posted by elecblue06
well like i said above unless he's going for 600+ whp (which is kinda silly) then there are other turbos that would have fit better.. now if he's going for 600 whp then thats a different story
im aiming for 600+ hp lol. not on my cobalt though.

i guess we need to know more of where hes going with the build before we can judge
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:11 PM
  #54  
Slammed07's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-17-09
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Ive ran the 35r on my old 1st gen and the car was great, I wasnt the working the turbo hard at all at 20psi i was making over 400whp...This is a totally different build so I cant compare my car to yours...I do think you should be making more then 400whp but I dont know the dyno or your set up 100% to give any advise. If this is how the car was staying, stock motor and all the turbo was a waste but just like me I dont think you have bought the 35r to stay on a stock motor, im sure the op has bigger plans for this turbo as I did on my build.

Good luck with the build and hope to see big numbers with this car!!!!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #55  
stacy_dammit's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-17-09
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
From: L.A. ,Cali4NIA
cant see at school.but I wanna turbo my lsj soon.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #56  
SMG Autosports's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-27-06
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Mass
I hate to be one to make comments because i try to not be a vendor to trash talk but, I feel like it is needed to step in on this one....

....First of all....I would challenge ANYONE to put a 50 trim on a stock LSJ motor and make over 400 whp....period the end. I hate to say it but some people that are unfamiliar with turbos/building turbo cars need to quit looking at turbo specs and seeing "cabable of 450 whp" and thinking anything you bolt that turbo on will make 450whp! MOSTLY ALL turbo's give you a range of C.I.D of engine it can go on, and most range from 1.8L-2.6L some 2.0L-3.0L so like i said, I would like to see a 50 trim make over 400whp on a stock LSJ.

Second...keep in mind where this build is heading... this car is FAR from being in its final stages, some people saying the turbo is a waste are way off base. Could the car make more power yes...will it ulimately make more..OF COURSE! but the build isnt done yet. He found a good deal on a great turbo and jumped on it... knowing plenty well that down the road once the engine is build it will be used to its full potential. Does this car make more power than MOST members cars on this forum...YES so im not sure why so many people seem to be hating.

The dyno here reads perfectly correct, not sure why we get so many complaints from members here, but have no complains from our 600, 700, or 800+ V8 customers. You think its because so many guys here tend to, lets say .....skew numbers????????? Sort of like because another company here made 400 whp with a twincharged car, that every twincharged car should make that, however did anyone take a look at the fact that they ran a hair of 30psi through that car with an AFR in the 12's with race fuel!?!?!?! does that seem like something anyone would want to try on their stock motor????

Point im trying to make is too many people here have seems to get jaded about what is a realistic number and what is a number that was just made once to be the highest powered car in the world under non-realistic conditions. I think if i left a customers car with a tune in it that was in the 12's, with tons of boost and a race gas tune in it and said here you go its safe as can be....i'd be out of business.

To conclude....this car made great power with what it has done to it and would wipe up alot of cars here. Is there area's for improvement of course....but isnt that the point of building a car in steps? otherwise if you did it all at once....there would be no fun to have down the road

Thanks for listening to my rant!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:21 PM
  #57  
rico's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-09-07
Posts: 8,962
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
^ great post
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #58  
07MetallicSC's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 09-29-06
Posts: 20,663
Likes: 216
From: Land of Freedom
Smg ftw
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:26 PM
  #59  
Slammed07's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-17-09
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Thats a great post smg, very well said thank you..
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #60  
luciano23456's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-02-07
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Ft Hood, TX not by choice
honestly tho for the number of folks hating on this guy you would think at some point sooner someone would have made a post like smg's. but before you even get to that point, how about you say 'good job' or nothing at all. so you dont like his setup....so? i dont ever recall him asking you to. so instead of other members being able to jus read thru a thread about somebodies build they have to read thru an arguement/bash session.....grow up, seriously
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 12:38 PM
  #61  
JL-KA's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-22-08
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
From: Here
lol.
Good stuff man.
Keep us updated on the build.
I wanna see vids of you racing Vipers too someday
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 01:34 PM
  #62  
07MetallicSC's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 09-29-06
Posts: 20,663
Likes: 216
From: Land of Freedom
Originally Posted by luciano23456
honestly tho for the number of folks hating on this guy you would think at some point sooner someone would have made a post like smg's. but before you even get to that point, how about you say 'good job' or nothing at all. so you dont like his setup....so? i dont ever recall him asking you to. so instead of other members being able to jus read thru a thread about somebodies build they have to read thru an arguement/bash session.....grow up, seriously
some of us didnt post what Fred did because we figured it was common sense, but its clear on this site more often than not that people lack it...
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #63  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Originally Posted by INFE
Yea that turbo will shine at higher boost levels but I would really look for a better intake mani for those boost levels. Your only asking for trouble
why that intake manifold is designed by saab specifically for turbocharged applications. i seriously doubt the hahn intake manifold flows nearly as well. the only bonus i see to the hahn is the plenum size which is a hair to big imo.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 02:30 PM
  #64  
damien's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
From: NJ
The hahn mani is nice but damn right, it most likely flows like ****. You can't just build one giant manifold with 4 runners expecting the flow to be good.

Now if someone made something that had true velocity stacks and flowed well i'd be impressed.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 02:57 PM
  #65  
Benfica7's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-08-08
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Taunton, MA
Sweet numbers, JC. Ignore the haters.

And SMG FTMFW!!!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 04:17 PM
  #66  
Ben.Reilly's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-19-08
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: RI
Thumbs up

Quoted for truth.

Originally Posted by SMG Autosports
I hate to be one to make comments because i try to not be a vendor to trash talk but, I feel like it is needed to step in on this one....

....First of all....I would challenge ANYONE to put a 50 trim on a stock LSJ motor and make over 400 whp....period the end. I hate to say it but some people that are unfamiliar with turbos/building turbo cars need to quit looking at turbo specs and seeing "cabable of 450 whp" and thinking anything you bolt that turbo on will make 450whp! MOSTLY ALL turbo's give you a range of C.I.D of engine it can go on, and most range from 1.8L-2.6L some 2.0L-3.0L so like i said, I would like to see a 50 trim make over 400whp on a stock LSJ.

Second...keep in mind where this build is heading... this car is FAR from being in its final stages, some people saying the turbo is a waste are way off base. Could the car make more power yes...will it ulimately make more..OF COURSE! but the build isnt done yet. He found a good deal on a great turbo and jumped on it... knowing plenty well that down the road once the engine is build it will be used to its full potential. Does this car make more power than MOST members cars on this forum...YES so im not sure why so many people seem to be hating.

The dyno here reads perfectly correct, not sure why we get so many complaints from members here, but have no complains from our 600, 700, or 800+ V8 customers. You think its because so many guys here tend to, lets say .....skew numbers????????? Sort of like because another company here made 400 whp with a twincharged car, that every twincharged car should make that, however did anyone take a look at the fact that they ran a hair of 30psi through that car with an AFR in the 12's with race fuel!?!?!?! does that seem like something anyone would want to try on their stock motor????

Point im trying to make is too many people here have seems to get jaded about what is a realistic number and what is a number that was just made once to be the highest powered car in the world under non-realistic conditions. I think if i left a customers car with a tune in it that was in the 12's, with tons of boost and a race gas tune in it and said here you go its safe as can be....i'd be out of business.

To conclude....this car made great power with what it has done to it and would wipe up alot of cars here. Is there area's for improvement of course....but isnt that the point of building a car in steps? otherwise if you did it all at once....there would be no fun to have down the road

Thanks for listening to my rant!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 04:17 PM
  #67  
BlackCobalt707's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 02-16-08
Posts: 8,405
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA/Travis AFB, CA
i need a saab manifold
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #68  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
well fine I'll apologize but he's never said how much power he's shooting for.. also SMG no one ever said anything about making over 400 whp on a 50 trim.. we said you could make more power on a better paired turbo

if he's going for crazy numbers then this is a great turbo for it

something I've wondered about .. have you guys looked at porting the saab intake manifold? I thought about getting it and doing something similar

also smg.. don't point fingers at other companies for skewing numbers.. they provide all more information then many other people on this forum and are usually pretty upfront with their numbers

and it doesn't matter if he's making more power or not.. people are voicing their concerns with that large of a turbo and his setup if he didn't want any criticism then don't post your **** he should've knowned after last time what was going to happen \

and no one is scared of real world numbers we're just saying his numbers seem low
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 04:47 PM
  #69  
rico's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-09-07
Posts: 8,962
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
so what could i make off a super20g?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 04:51 PM
  #70  
JL-KA's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-22-08
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 0
From: Here
Originally Posted by elecblue06
well fine I'll apologize but he's never said how much power he's shooting for.. also SMG no one ever said anything about making over 400 whp on a 50 trim.. we said you could make more power on a better paired turbo
yes they did

Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP
You would pick up HP by switching to a Sheetmetal intake, without a doubt. I'd bet on gains as much as 40whp. Our current COTM had a sheetmetal intake for sale not too long ago, iirc.

For a GT35R, you really aren't making all that much power. I don't know what you're doing wrong... but that is a large turbo that should easily have you around 500whp, not 400whp. ESPECIALLY, if you're pushing 25psi. That's friggin laughable, to be honest. What kind of A/R do you have on that thing? My little 50trim will make more than 410whp @ 25psi. And I'd put money on that. A large amount of money.

Not hating, just sayin'... you're doing something wrong.



If you are reaching full boost at 4500rpm on a GT30... something is wrong. We're not talking about 1st or 2nd gear either. In 3rd or 4th gear on a GT30... you should probably be hitting full boost around 3500rpm, I'd say. My shitty Journal Bearing 50trim hits full boost at like 3800.
Originally Posted by BlackCobalt707
i need a saab manifold
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/appearance-48/junkyard-parts-thread-198141/

Last edited by JL-KA; Mar 15, 2010 at 04:51 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 04:55 PM
  #71  
100% METH's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-02-10
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 15
From: Los Angeles
Maxim, have you read into the heat disbursement coating used on other applications?

Wouldn't be a bad idea to try out on your intake manifold. Prob. only run you 100-150 dollars
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 05:01 PM
  #72  
INFE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-06-07
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 1
From: LI, New York
Originally Posted by jimbos'ss
why that intake manifold is designed by saab specifically for turbocharged applications. i seriously doubt the hahn intake manifold flows nearly as well. the only bonus i see to the hahn is the plenum size which is a hair to big imo.
Hey jimbo all i got to say to you is who makes more power me or you and 407 is not my highest number
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 05:11 PM
  #73  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Originally Posted by INFE
Hey jimbo all i got to say to you is who makes more power me or you and 407 is not my highest number
dunno, never dynoed, never claimed too have. you pay i'll go dyno.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 07:01 PM
  #74  
all4glh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-07
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: Upstate NY
SMG, see you guys in April.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2010 | 07:16 PM
  #75  
Dayta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-09-06
Posts: 5,427
Likes: 1
From: MA
Originally Posted by all4glh
SMG, see you guys in April.
woot woot
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.