The best sounding LSJ ever!? I think so
06-22-2010, 11:23 AM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-14-07
Location: NYC
Posts: 30,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-22-2010, 12:05 PM
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-01-06
Location: Maidstone, SK
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Complete bullshit.
Completely untrue statement.
The header rivals the power output of any other long tube on the market, however, it allows for a torque band unlike others.
And it actually is nearly as 'equal length' as OTTP's header; one primary is about 0.25" shorter than the rest on the particular header I had (as compared to +.125, -.125 on the competition).
The reason for the 'suby sound' was the lack of a rotational collector. It fired 2 and 1 beside each other in a high velocity pulse, followed by 3 and 4 beside each other in a second pulse. It was simply the scavenging effects that caused the sound.
Further more, the idea that it is 'inefficient' is to this day a baffling concept.... apparently no one has ever really studied flow dynamic enough to understand the reasoning behind why this header allows for such a great torque band in the mid-range.
Oh... and before people start talking **** about how I only defend it cause I own it ... actually, I sold it months ago... and sometimes regret doing it. But at least I know the new owner seems to love it.
The header rivals the power output of any other long tube on the market, however, it allows for a torque band unlike others.
And it actually is nearly as 'equal length' as OTTP's header; one primary is about 0.25" shorter than the rest on the particular header I had (as compared to +.125, -.125 on the competition).
The reason for the 'suby sound' was the lack of a rotational collector. It fired 2 and 1 beside each other in a high velocity pulse, followed by 3 and 4 beside each other in a second pulse. It was simply the scavenging effects that caused the sound.
Further more, the idea that it is 'inefficient' is to this day a baffling concept.... apparently no one has ever really studied flow dynamic enough to understand the reasoning behind why this header allows for such a great torque band in the mid-range.
Oh... and before people start talking **** about how I only defend it cause I own it ... actually, I sold it months ago... and sometimes regret doing it. But at least I know the new owner seems to love it.
06-22-2010, 04:26 PM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
In fact, most of them posted sound terrible, IMO.
This one here sounds great though.....
http://s36.photobucket.com/albums/e3...t=VID00024.flv
This one here sounds great though.....
http://s36.photobucket.com/albums/e3...t=VID00024.flv
06-22-2010, 10:08 PM
#35
New Member
Join Date: 01-23-09
Location: Minot
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
personaly i love the header had it on for over a year gave the car a little more low end torque and an awesome sound
heres a vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-jNlatreJM
heres a vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-jNlatreJM
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post