this shall be my next mod...
this shall be my next mod...
jackson racing supercharger for my rsx type s...9 psi hopefully with an aftecooler...looking for 320whp with a simple street tune...i guess thats enough power even though a gt35r could pop 350whp easy
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....0-3740D3FCCE08
http://media.putfile.com/11psi-RSX-vs-85psi-RSX
http://upload3.putfile.com/videos/36410255339.wmv
http://videos.streetfire.net/player....1-030CFCEAFC04
they sound different than the cobalt ss even though they use the same charger...
how does the cobalts clutch hold up? how are the shifts?
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....0-3740D3FCCE08
http://media.putfile.com/11psi-RSX-vs-85psi-RSX
http://upload3.putfile.com/videos/36410255339.wmv
http://videos.streetfire.net/player....1-030CFCEAFC04
they sound different than the cobalt ss even though they use the same charger...
how does the cobalts clutch hold up? how are the shifts?
yea, but ripp sds is the only company that makes a supercharger for my car and it's a vortec. i was just trying to say that if Jackson Racing made a eaton for my car, it would be bad ass!
Originally Posted by silverSS
we have Eaton blowers, not Jackson racing, nice RSX's in the vids tho 

Originally Posted by fifasf
I think after stage 2 we will have a little more of a louder whine than now.
rsx's are maxing the blower out at around 12psi with a ep3 ps swap....now with ips ksc cams the boost drops because of the efficiency...stock cobalts may read like 15 psi on the gauge but add a header, exhaust, and intake and you'll see a dramatic drop
hehehehe
1) we use a eaton m62 charger (different)
2) to get to 350whp in that car you will have to do more than just the s/c ...... you know that right?
3) if you got the cash ........ go for it
it would be an awsome car as long as you do it right
1) we use a eaton m62 charger (different)
2) to get to 350whp in that car you will have to do more than just the s/c ...... you know that right?
3) if you got the cash ........ go for it
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
jackson racing supercharger for my rsx type s...9 psi hopefully with an aftecooler...looking for 320whp with a simple street tune...i guess thats enough power even though a gt35r could pop 350whp easy
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....0-3740D3FCCE08
http://media.putfile.com/11psi-RSX-vs-85psi-RSX
http://upload3.putfile.com/videos/36410255339.wmv
http://videos.streetfire.net/player....1-030CFCEAFC04
they sound different than the cobalt ss even though they use the same charger...
how does the cobalts clutch hold up? how are the shifts?
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....0-3740D3FCCE08
http://media.putfile.com/11psi-RSX-vs-85psi-RSX
http://upload3.putfile.com/videos/36410255339.wmv
http://videos.streetfire.net/player....1-030CFCEAFC04
they sound different than the cobalt ss even though they use the same charger...
how does the cobalts clutch hold up? how are the shifts?
Originally Posted by Mercury
What I was saying is that it isn't exactally like ours. There must be other things done to that blower. 
Originally Posted by pclear9061
but the HUGE question what would your TQ be? 350 hp with only ~ 180 TQ wont get you very fast
350 supercharged hp would have torque in the 220's...
for example...a R6...600cc's fuel injected makes around 102 hp...and only 50 or so foot lbs..its lack of torque is compensated by the fact that its able to build hp up to 14,000 rpms...like the rsx....most often sc'd runs an 8600-8800 rpm redline
Originally Posted by pclear9061
hehehehe
1) we use a eaton m62 charger (different)
2) to get to 350whp in that car you will have to do more than just the s/c ...... you know that right?
3) if you got the cash ........ go for it
it would be an awsome car as long as you do it right 
1) we use a eaton m62 charger (different)
2) to get to 350whp in that car you will have to do more than just the s/c ...... you know that right?
3) if you got the cash ........ go for it
Originally Posted by SRTurbo
i can vouch that these kits are quick....when i was stock i raced one at the track and i got owned by about 2-3 car lenghts....though it was my first time at the track he said he was still putting about 270 to the wheels so ya i got worked lol
Originally Posted by pclear9061
but you were saying that rsx's are maxing at 12 psi when the ss/sc / RL can max ~20-22 psi
The Saturn Ion RedLine (RL) features the 2.0L Supercharged ECOTEC (LSJ) motor. The supercharger is the latest generation Eaton M62 helical roots style positive displacement supercharger and offers a maximum of 12 psi of manifold pressure for a 40% increase in power. The latest generation offers a more efficient low-end power and improved durability from a more precision made zero-contact assembly. Also the supercharger is configured with an internal bypass valve to lower off power loads resulting in less power used and higher MPG ratings when cruising. The intake manifold that the supercharger is mated to is an all aluminum port matched intake manifold with an internal water-to-air Laminova heat exchanger intercooler. This style of heat exchanger is more efficient than even that of a bar and plate intercooler and offers more compact packaging. When the whole package is configured together and controlled with a high speed PCM it produces 200 HP and 200 lb-ft TQ for a very solid and reliable powertrain package.
As is the case in every consumer’s quest for “more power” the common ideology is that the more air you can stuff in a motor the more power you will get out of it. This is a solid way of thinking as long as it’s adhered to with attention to both the needs of the air (oxygen) and the needs of a combustible (fuel). Other factors contribute to the whole process like spark and it’s timing, but for simplicity sake focus will be directed to just air and fuel (mixture). In the case of the RL the fuel needs are addressed 100% by the PCM and sensor input based on the mass of airflow entering the engine. The M62 supercharger based on the relationship of the engine rpm and rotor speed addresses the air needs of the motor. This leads individuals to assume that by spinning the supercharger faster that it will also increase the air entering the motor and by ideology make more power. This assumption is inaccurate and will only lead to a loss in power, and increase in heat and drastically reduced supercharger and engine life.
As is the case in every consumer’s quest for “more power” the common ideology is that the more air you can stuff in a motor the more power you will get out of it. This is a solid way of thinking as long as it’s adhered to with attention to both the needs of the air (oxygen) and the needs of a combustible (fuel). Other factors contribute to the whole process like spark and it’s timing, but for simplicity sake focus will be directed to just air and fuel (mixture). In the case of the RL the fuel needs are addressed 100% by the PCM and sensor input based on the mass of airflow entering the engine. The M62 supercharger based on the relationship of the engine rpm and rotor speed addresses the air needs of the motor. This leads individuals to assume that by spinning the supercharger faster that it will also increase the air entering the motor and by ideology make more power. This assumption is inaccurate and will only lead to a loss in power, and increase in heat and drastically reduced supercharger and engine life.
Originally Posted by FastFrontier17
really?
ive heard of some cobalts getting 15psi readings but that is mostly due to the restriction of the stock exhaust, mani, and intake...20 psi sound impossible for the m62...the m90 on the other hand is capable...but GM uses the M90 mostly on their 3.8 v6
ive heard of some cobalts getting 15psi readings but that is mostly due to the restriction of the stock exhaust, mani, and intake...20 psi sound impossible for the m62...the m90 on the other hand is capable...but GM uses the M90 mostly on their 3.8 v6


