Site Development and Help Site Discussions, Suggestions, and Help
View Poll Results: What do you think?
I hate sigs.
2
8.33%
Plain text (7 lines) all the way
2
8.33%
100 pixels high plus 4 lines only is good.
7
29.17%
150 pixels high for an image only ftw
8
33.33%
Why should there be a limit?
5
20.83%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Sig Discussion - Vote

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #1  
OniMirage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Cool Sig Discussion - Vote

So the first thing I do when I wake up other than get ready and go to work is turn on some cobaltss.net cus I love this place. Lots of buddies here you know. But this morning I got a message, a message not of a happy nature but one of authority. It was in regards to my sig which according to the rules is too large.

Signatures pictures should not be bigger than 500x100 and 100kb. Also, sigs should not exceed 7 lines if no picture is used. If a picture is used, please limit the text lines to 4. One "userbar" counts as one line. We don’t mean to be **** about sigs, but many users have slow internet connection and large signatures take a long time to load. If you have a big sig, and post multiple times in one thread, some members may not be able to load and read that page.
There is actually one flaw to that quote. An internet browser only needs to load 1 similar image per page even if the entire page contains that same image a thousand times and some (newer) browsers only need to load an image once per session 56k or not. Pixel size has no relation to file size when downloading a file on any connection. A 1920x1080 image will load just as fast as a 640x480 image if they are both the same in file size.

Everyone I am sure has seen my sig and I did at one point try to edit the sig to no luck cus 100 pixels tall is too small and makes the image look stupid and you can't tell what it is. I wish I had the original image I took but that image was uploaded here and unfortunately by the time I realized it cobaltss.net's database had deleted the full 2560x1920 image so I have a very small image to work with. Below is what it would look like.



Now the rules mention 100 pixels high plus 4 lines so let's see that would look like this


1
2
3
4

that equals 154 pixels high



Now I am not complaining I just feel that those that have skill enough to enter text directly to their sig should not be limited to 100 pixels but rather 150 pixels would work very well.

But what about image size which can't exceed 100kb ... well my original file is exactly that amount so file size for an image 500x150 would be less than that.



I think that this is actually a great alternative. A rule could be entered that says a sig with text cannot exceed 500x150 pixels and would allow for much more creative freedom for those that like to create sig files for their favorite cobalt site and for those that create sig files for others that don't have the tools or knowledge to do so.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:35 AM
  #2  
Frankruffolo257's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 10-26-07
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: StripedHEMI766 Racine, WI
Nice! Yeah, i get introuble for my sigs all the time, there is just no pleasing people
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #3  
Kahless's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 5
From: TX
i say who cares about sig size. there is a very simple box to click that says do not show sigs that people on 56k need to know about. if we could get that out to the masses the sigs wouldnt be a prob for those of us in the broadband era. altho some sigs got ridiculous. and some need to be reedited to take out empty space around them causing it to be too big.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #4  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
I understand your point, but those are the rules, it doesn't just have to do with file size. I understand how it all works, and im sure JonyyB does too.

But, it also has to do with your signature taking up half of someone screen when they are viewing a thread. If you feel that the rules need amended this is not the way to do it, you need to contact the Admin/JonyyB and voice your concern with with rules...

You can contact him via PM or the Contact Us link at the top of the page.

I would also like to add that even with 4 lines of text your sig is still larger the 100px+4 lines:


Last edited by REIGN SS; Nov 20, 2007 at 10:45 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #5  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
let it go guys. theres no reason this should even be a thread. rules are rules. if you get a warning, just make it smaller. most of the sigs are pretty cheesy anyway

*note, my sig is correctly sized. because i got an infraction, i'm not mad about it, there really are some people using dial up. hell i probably would be if i wasnt addicted to XBL
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:53 AM
  #6  
OniMirage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by REIGN SS
I understand your point, but those are the rules, it doesn't just have to do with file size. I understand how it all works, and im sure JonyyB does too.

But, it also has to do with your signature taking up half of someone screen when they are viewing a thread. If you feel that the rules need amended this is not the way to do it, you need to contact the Admin/JonyyB and voice your concern with with rules...

You can contact him via PM or the Contact Us link at the top of the page.

I would also like to add that even with 4 lines of text your sig is still larger the 100px+4 lines:
indeed lol I will have to edit my sig when I get home but I will make a 150 version so as to at least comply with 100px+4 lines rule.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 10:58 AM
  #7  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
for anyone that votes: Why should there be a limit?

1.) if there wasnt a limit everyone would have 2MB GIF sigs and the site would crash
2.) have you ever read a thread where someone with that has a 600px tall image posts 30 times? it gets old having to scroll past it & its probably over 100kb.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:02 AM
  #8  
CinciSS07's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-09-07
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
reign, isnt your sig against site rules? not that its size, but for this reason...

No Competing Sites - We have no issues with competition; however, it would be against our best interests, and therefore the best interests of our members, for us to allow such sites to build upon our popularity by promoting themselves on CobaltSS.net. Therefore, no competing site may attempt to gain traffic from CobaltSS.net in any way, including but not limited to, links in posts, signatures, profile information, PM's, emails, or IM's. No treads about starting competing sites.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #9  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
Originally Posted by CinciSS07
reign, isnt your sig against site rules? not that its size, but for this reason...

No Competing Sites - We have no issues with competition; however, it would be against our best interests, and therefore the best interests of our members, for us to allow such sites to build upon our popularity by promoting themselves on CobaltSS.net. Therefore, no competing site may attempt to gain traffic from CobaltSS.net in any way, including but not limited to, links in posts, signatures, profile information, PM's, emails, or IM's. No treads about starting competing sites.
No its a regional site, and I've discussed it with JonyyB already.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:15 AM
  #10  
redlineblueline's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-13-05
Posts: 7,548
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh/Norfolk
ooooh burn
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #11  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
Lets keep it on topic now guys... This is about the rules for signature size.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:18 AM
  #12  
redlineblueline's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-13-05
Posts: 7,548
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh/Norfolk
i dont see how people get over the 7 lines because when i edit mine if i am over the limit it wont save
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #13  
chevysalesman614's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
i really think .gif images shouldn't be allowed. (i dont know if they are, but i see them alot)
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #14  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
They are, as long as they are smaller the 100kb and 500x100px
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #15  
Rangerondubz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-06
Posts: 5,450
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida
I <3 my sig
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:04 PM
  #16  
OniMirage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by Rangerondubz
I <3 my sig
im sure many others do as well
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #17  
Cobalt_SSTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-30-06
Posts: 14,899
Likes: 0
From: J-Town, Wisconsin
i loved my sig before i got an infraction for it. everybody loved the guy in the barbie car but it had to be removed
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:43 PM
  #18  
SSCobalt~SSZ24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-17-06
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
From: Columbus,Ohio
Originally Posted by chevysalesman614
let it go guys. theres no reason this should even be a thread. rules are rules. if you get a warning, just make it smaller. most of the sigs are pretty cheesy anyway

*note, my sig is correctly sized. because i got an infraction, i'm not mad about it, there really are some people using dial up. hell i probably would be if i wasnt addicted to XBL
i agree no big deal! i got a warning so i made it smaller, not a huge thing!
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 02:45 PM
  #19  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
the biggest thing is that when someone with dialup gets on, the page has to be longer to accomodate the long sigs, so although your sig may be within file size, it makes the overall amount of info that needs to be loaded and processed more.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 03:02 PM
  #20  
OniMirage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
the biggest thing is that when someone with dialup gets on, the page has to be longer to accomodate the long sigs, so although your sig may be within file size, it makes the overall amount of info that needs to be loaded and processed more.
this is not true the size of the webpage has nothing to do with loading the page from the internet. If the computer is slow it can take longer but this has nothing to do with the downloading of information.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #21  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
yes it does, if you have to load a page that is twice as long because of sigs, you have to load everything across the entire scree, its more lines of data overall...i have mine set so that i view 40 posts at once, so that means that your extra lines times 40 is what is extended onto the end of the overall length...think in data terms
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 03:53 PM
  #22  
OniMirage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
yes it does, if you have to load a page that is twice as long because of sigs, you have to load everything across the entire scree, its more lines of data overall...i have mine set so that i view 40 posts at once, so that means that your extra lines times 40 is what is extended onto the end of the overall length...think in data terms
i think in data terms all day thats what I do for a living

also rendering a webpage is not like rendering an 3d image with a 3d app or rendering an animation or video. Most of what is done these days is completed through scripts which can generate the information quickly. When you specify 40 responses that is all that is being displayed regardless of post size. If it was all text the page would load quickly. If everyone has a sig it would load slower because of the extra data only because the images must be displayed. Having a larger or smaller image extending the page has no bearing on the overall load time just the file size has that kind of affect.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 03:58 PM
  #23  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by OniMirage
i think in data terms all day thats what I do for a living
well then you should know, the more overall amount of **** on a page that has to be loaded (ie, a bigger sig) the longer it takes to load based on the fact that the computer has to process that much more info. Secondly, it takes up space on the server in the way of saved threads with your huge sig and less space on the server means more crashes...and then we kill you...
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #24  
OniMirage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
well then you should know, the more overall amount of **** on a page that has to be loaded (ie, a bigger sig) the longer it takes to load based on the fact that the computer has to process that much more info. Secondly, it takes up space on the server in the way of saved threads with your huge sig and less space on the server means more crashes...and then we kill you...
your assuming we use cobaltss.net for loading images in our sig which most people don't do. in this case we are actually saving cobaltss.net from crashing since only the form data is being loaded rather than the images. When the page is loaded the images begin to load and that is when additional time is taken but again the file pixel sizes can be huge or small the only thing that matters is file size in KB/MB. The page being shorter or longer has no bearing on page load times.
Old Nov 20, 2007 | 04:21 PM
  #25  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
but it takes space, which makes the webpage itself expand, and that extra expanse (the overall length of the webpage) will be larger...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.