War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Cobalt SS T/C GMSTG1 kit vs. WRX 265

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 09:44 AM
  #26  
jpower102's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-09
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by IhaveReturned
You get torque steer at 75mph???


I guess so


Yah I get it with my winter tires on .. not with the stock conti's .. can't wait for spring !!

I would usually go down to 3rd if it wasn't for that

Originally Posted by ajjaro
he should definetly apologize for that statement, the only car with a monster 4th gear is the GTO
I find that since I got the stage kit .. the 4 th gear is VERY different .. but then again all speeds are lol

Last edited by jpower102; Jan 24, 2010 at 09:44 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #27  
08inBama's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-08
Posts: 3,882
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
so you were worried about downshifting to 3rd but NOT doing 140mph in apparently winter condition?

Darwinism folks
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #28  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by ajjaro
he should definetly apologize for that statement, the only car with a monster 4th gear is the GTO
Nah, 4th gear in the GTO sucks. It just pulls harder than ko4 powered cars in 4th gear.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #29  
ajjaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
Nah, 4th gear in the GTO sucks. It just pulls harder than ko4 powered cars in 4th gear.
i would hope it pulls harder than a cobalt given the displacement and the price. however saying it pulls harder than k04 powered cars is not true.

the veyron is k04 powered x4
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 08:53 AM
  #30  
wantedSS/TC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-25-09
Posts: 11,759
Likes: 0
From: Aston, PA
Originally Posted by 08inBama
so you were worried about downshifting to 3rd but NOT doing 140mph in apparently winter condition?

Darwinism folks
lulz; seriously
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 08:38 PM
  #31  
damien's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Lol.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 08:42 PM
  #32  
tREBs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-16-06
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
From: World
Let him get a tune and DP and try again I bet it'll be a different story.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 08:50 AM
  #33  
wantedSS/TC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-25-09
Posts: 11,759
Likes: 0
From: Aston, PA
Let him learn how to drive.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #34  
slowbalt84's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-03-09
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
From: Warrenton, MO
1) 140mph? you're dumb

2) torque steer in 3rd gear with the GM stage 1 tune? haha

3) 140mph? you're an idiot
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 02:07 PM
  #35  
tglems's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-01-09
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by jpower102

SO DONT BASH ME .. CONGRATULATE ME !! ;p
Congrats!

Originally Posted by jsscooby
I'd like the TC Sedan much more if it had the Coupes tailights.
QFT...but I do love my sedan. Only problem is that sometimes it is "too" much of a sleeper :-)

Last edited by tglems; Jan 26, 2010 at 02:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 04:00 PM
  #36  
jpower102's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-09
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by slowbalt84
1) 140mph? you're dumb

2) torque steer in 3rd gear with the GM stage 1 tune? haha

3) 140mph? you're an idiot


I am an idiot .. but the speed rating of my tires is plenty high and the roads were empty .. so its kinda my choice .. I'm not jeopordizing anyone's life except mine right?

YES torque steer on 3rd gear with winter performance tires..

Originally Posted by wantedSS/TC
Let him learn how to drive.


believe me .. I may not be the best track driver ATM, but I can drive the **** out my car in the straights

Originally Posted by 08inBama
so you were worried about downshifting to 3rd but NOT doing 140mph in apparently winter condition?

Darwinism folks
and you think I would actually take the risk of driving that fast with actual snow or ice ON the road ?..

Last edited by jpower102; Jan 26, 2010 at 04:00 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #37  
wantedSS/TC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-25-09
Posts: 11,759
Likes: 0
From: Aston, PA
Originally Posted by tglems
Congrats!



QFT...but I do love my sedan. Only problem is that sometimes it is "too" much of a sleeper :-)
I get that problem too. Gets annoying since the cars that think thy're faster (evo's, etc.) think I'm just some punk. Until we finally go, then I get a loof of
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 01:58 AM
  #38  
06yellowburdSS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-06-10
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: NJ
i dont see the big deal with torque steer in 3rd...just drive it out, progressively push down on the throttle instead of mashing it and you would be surprised how easily you can control the torque steer. and yea....anyone can drive the **** out of a car in a strait line if they had half a brain lmao
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 02:07 AM
  #39  
IhaveReturned's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-19-10
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Iraq
Originally Posted by 06yellowburdSS
i dont see the big deal with torque steer in 3rd...just drive it out, progressively push down on the throttle instead of mashing it and you would be surprised how easily you can control the torque steer. and yea....anyone can drive the **** out of a car in a strait line if they had half a brain lmao
Are you guys confusing torque steer with tramlining? I just don't how you could be getting torque steer at those speeds.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 07:38 AM
  #40  
jpower102's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-09
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by 06yellowburdSS
i dont see the big deal with torque steer in 3rd...just drive it out, progressively push down on the throttle instead of mashing it and you would be surprised how easily you can control the torque steer. and yea....anyone can drive the **** out of a car in a strait line if they had half a brain lmao
And how do you explain ppl with 14.5 second 1/4 miles and 13.8 .. with the exact same car .. with the questions sometimes asked on this forum .. I don't know how you can give such an answer

Originally Posted by IhaveReturned
Are you guys confusing torque steer with tramlining? I just don't how you could be getting torque steer at those speeds.
Whatever you call it .. all I know is I really have to keep my two hands on tight on the steering wheel if I don't want to go bye bye in the ditch

AND AGAIN .. I'M ON WINTER PERFORMANCE TIRES= MUCH LESS STABILITY

Last edited by jpower102; Jan 27, 2010 at 07:38 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 11:57 AM
  #41  
restonSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-08
Posts: 2,050
Likes: 0
From: up my own ass
[QUOTE=jpower102;4635494]And how do you explain ppl with 14.5 second 1/4 miles and 13.8 .. with the exact same car .. with the questions sometimes asked on this forum .. I don't know how you can give such an answer

ill explain it. the specific tune, humidity level or just overall temperatures, track prep, and arguably most important, the 60 foot bc .1 diff in 60 foot equals .2 diff in end time. example 1.8 60 ran with a quarter mile time of 12.8. a car with the same mods that get a 2.0 60 foot wil prob be closer to a 13.2. and also the 60 foot is eliminated when rolling in case you didnt know.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #42  
jpower102's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-09
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Quebec
[QUOTE=restonSS;4636128]
Originally Posted by jpower102
And how do you explain ppl with 14.5 second 1/4 miles and 13.8 .. with the exact same car .. with the questions sometimes asked on this forum .. I don't know how you can give such an answer

ill explain it. the specific tune, humidity level or just overall temperatures, track prep, and arguably most important, the 60 foot bc .1 diff in 60 foot equals .2 diff in end time. example 1.8 60 ran with a quarter mile time of 12.8. a car with the same mods that get a 2.0 60 foot wil prob be closer to a 13.2. and also the 60 foot is eliminated when rolling in case you didnt know.
Alrighty then .. so we are all exactly the same talented drivers !!

Good to know

But seriously .. I understand exactly what you mean .. and of course I wasn't refering to the weather conditions

I'm talking about the fact of just «feeling» the car and it being an extension of your body (LOL.. I'm feeling like a starwars writer)
Some ppl got it more than others .. I'm not the king of the road .. but when its time to really push it .. I can handle my own

YOU possibly are even better than me and I accept it .. but all in all I know how and when to push my car .. thats it
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 12:29 PM
  #43  
SuperchargedSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-07-05
Posts: 3,532
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by bmaynard06
Race him from a dig, would be a different story. They run 13.4 stock so you with gms1 would be a better race. Oh and base they only cost 25k.
They arent "25k" up here , try 40 000K ...
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 12:29 PM
  #44  
jpower102's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-09
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Quebec
Originally Posted by SuperchargedSS
They arent "25k" up here , try 40 000K ...
Actually they went down to 32k for a base model .. and like 36k for the higher trim
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #45  
wantedSS/TC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-25-09
Posts: 11,759
Likes: 0
From: Aston, PA
2.2 60' here and I ran a 12.9 @ 114

2.1 60' when stock and I ran 13.8 @ 104.5
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 12:36 PM
  #46  
SuperchargedSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-07-05
Posts: 3,532
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by jpower102
Actually they went down to 32k for a base model .. and like 36k for the higher trim
+ warranty, and applicable taxes etc you are at around the 40K mark. And thats the pre APR price. Add your interest to the price of the car over the duration of your financing as well. I would just save up the extra coin and get the Sti.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 12:49 PM
  #47  
hiltu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-10-08
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Saratoga Springs, NY
jpower, you have TWMs bushings but not their shifter? your sig is alittle misleading if so.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 01:02 PM
  #48  
bmaynard06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-13-08
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
25k (here in the US). I'm not lying. And go look at caranddriver, I think it is, they tested the 09/10 sedans and they ran 13.4's stock.

EDIT: This is from Car and Driver
"And when we say "plenty," we mean it: the revised WRX now blasts to 60 mph from a standstill in an electrifying 4.7 seconds. That's 1.1 seconds quicker than the 2008 model—and get this—0.3 second quicker than we've managed in a WRX STI, the supposedly higher-performance version of the WRX. The fact that the WRX is now substantially quicker seems absolutely bonkers, but there are a couple of good explanations. First, the WRX STI weighs a hearty 180 pounds more than the base WRX, according to our scales. Second, the STI and its closer-ratio six-speed manual call for two shifts to 60, while the regular WRX's five speed hits 60 mph in second gear. By the time the pair travel a quarter-mile, the '09 WRX loses some ground, though; both cross the line at 102 mph, with the base Rex edging out the STI by just 0.1 second, 13.5 to 13.6."


Last edited by bmaynard06; Jan 27, 2010 at 01:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 01:53 PM
  #49  
tREBs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-16-06
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
From: World
Originally Posted by bmaynard06
25k (here in the US). I'm not lying. And go look at caranddriver, I think it is, they tested the 09/10 sedans and they ran 13.4's stock.

EDIT: This is from Car and Driver
"And when we say "plenty," we mean it: the revised WRX now blasts to 60 mph from a standstill in an electrifying 4.7 seconds. That's 1.1 seconds quicker than the 2008 model—and get this—0.3 second quicker than we've managed in a WRX STI, the supposedly higher-performance version of the WRX. The fact that the WRX is now substantially quicker seems absolutely bonkers, but there are a couple of good explanations. First, the WRX STI weighs a hearty 180 pounds more than the base WRX, according to our scales. Second, the STI and its closer-ratio six-speed manual call for two shifts to 60, while the regular WRX's five speed hits 60 mph in second gear. By the time the pair travel a quarter-mile, the '09 WRX loses some ground, though; both cross the line at 102 mph, with the base Rex edging out the STI by just 0.1 second, 13.5 to 13.6."


And with nothing but a tune and DP they are faster then the 08-10 STI's. A lot of people hitting mid- high 12's. Quite impressive if you ask me
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 02:07 PM
  #50  
bmaynard06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-13-08
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
It aleady does

"the base Rex edging out the STI by just 0.1 second, 13.5 to 13.6."

I mean I know its because of weight, but I seen on the WRX forum some guy his 12.9 stock. Impressive for 25-26k base. I love them, just wish they were american lol
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 AM.