this damn mustang
wow this is just out of control. who cares if the terminator is s/c it will smoke a goat and a vette no prob stock (excluding the z06). and now they are actually comming out with the GT500 KR which bumps the power up by quite a bit. so lets just stop with all this arguing bull **** and answer the guys question.
wow this is just out of control. who cares if the terminator is s/c it will smoke a goat and a vette no prob stock (excluding the z06). and now they are actually comming out with the GT500 KR which bumps the power up by quite a bit. so lets just stop with all this arguing bull **** and answer the guys question.
Everyone is kind of dissapointed about that, you would think being a KR it would be King **** but all they did was tweak the tune and add a CAI. Ford really screwed up when they made the KR, it seems like Ford has been doing that alot lately though. LOL
under 80 mph trap speed = super fishy. are you sure it was an 06 and not like a 94...? lol i mean dude...they trap like 93-94 stock, you are talkin the same kinda difference as an ss/sc trapping in the mid 80's. Im not even saying it didnt happen, im just saying there had to be more to the story here. i dont have any slips for my v6 because i truthfully don't really car much about what i run with it, i just do it sometimes for fun cause i live close to a track, but if you look around at any forums or test drives or anything they run low 15's all day and some people hit 14's. Not tryin to be an ass, but you gotta see why that is fishy. a low 15@ low-mid 90's car running mid 16's trapping under 80...that just seems very odd. the trap speed mostly, ive seen lots of cars run way slower than they should, but not 15mph less trap speed than they should.

Car # ... 116 115
Class ...
Idx/Rec..
Ov/Un ... 16385 14957
DIAL ...
R/T ... .634 .559
60' ... 2.708 2.498
330 ... 7.196 6.559
1/8 ... 10.792 9.812
MPH ... 68.78 75.59
1000... 13.837 12.599
1/4 ... 16.385 14.957
MPH ... 88.43 96.37
Right 1st 1.5036
Compulink AUTOSTART ON!!!
Both lanes STAGED @ Starter GO
Rnd # TO 1550/1549
..... CompuLink StarTRAK 2007
Holy **** did he just let the car idle to the 60’ mark. LOL
That car should have 60' around 2.0-2.1 that right there takes off .6-.7 off his ET which would put him at around 15.6-15.7.
Seriously I can't imagine him spinning that badly or at all so I’m going to guess he didn't give it full gas right away. I can just blow the tires off my car and still 60’ 2.4, which is the worst I’ve ever 60’.
That car should have 60' around 2.0-2.1 that right there takes off .6-.7 off his ET which would put him at around 15.6-15.7.
Seriously I can't imagine him spinning that badly or at all so I’m going to guess he didn't give it full gas right away. I can just blow the tires off my car and still 60’ 2.4, which is the worst I’ve ever 60’.
I just looked everywhere today to find this timeslip today, and finaly did. I was wrong about what he traped, he actually traped @88.43 MPH, but he did run a 16.385. Here are the numbers, and you can see I caught him before the 60' mark like I said. All my origanal numbers were not 100% accurate due to them being of the top of my head, but here what we ran I was in the right lane. (I was bone stock, 106 degrees outside, and correction the altitude here is 2174 feet above see level)
Car # ... 116 115
Class ...
Idx/Rec..
Ov/Un ... 16385 14957
DIAL ...
R/T ... .634 .559
60' ... 2.708 2.498
330 ... 7.196 6.559
1/8 ... 10.792 9.812
MPH ... 68.78 75.59
1000... 13.837 12.599
1/4 ... 16.385 14.957
MPH ... 88.43 96.37
Right 1st 1.5036
Compulink AUTOSTART ON!!!
Both lanes STAGED @ Starter GO
Rnd # TO 1550/1549
..... CompuLink StarTRAK 2007
Car # ... 116 115
Class ...
Idx/Rec..
Ov/Un ... 16385 14957
DIAL ...
R/T ... .634 .559
60' ... 2.708 2.498
330 ... 7.196 6.559
1/8 ... 10.792 9.812
MPH ... 68.78 75.59
1000... 13.837 12.599
1/4 ... 16.385 14.957
MPH ... 88.43 96.37
Right 1st 1.5036
Compulink AUTOSTART ON!!!
Both lanes STAGED @ Starter GO
Rnd # TO 1550/1549
..... CompuLink StarTRAK 2007
gt500 500hp
KR 650hp
Super Snake 750hp
Last edited by cakeeater; Aug 12, 2007 at 07:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
You all do relize that this was a V6 mustang that I went up against, not a GT? Just want to clarify this.
Also before anyone says anthing about my 60' time I would like to state I was launching the car pretty lighly. The car only had around 900 miles on it at the time, and I did not want to destroy the axles. I know these cobalts are easly capable of 2.2 60' times, but the track out here really sucks. Ask Hickoverlord, he cracked his tranny out here by lauching to hard, you get really violent wheel hop here. I cant wait to go back home to Texas next year, because then I am going to run my car at Ennis. I have ran there in a FWD years ago, and the track is way better. Plus it being at almost sea level I am expecting a low 13 second pass with my mods.
Also before anyone says anthing about my 60' time I would like to state I was launching the car pretty lighly. The car only had around 900 miles on it at the time, and I did not want to destroy the axles. I know these cobalts are easly capable of 2.2 60' times, but the track out here really sucks. Ask Hickoverlord, he cracked his tranny out here by lauching to hard, you get really violent wheel hop here. I cant wait to go back home to Texas next year, because then I am going to run my car at Ennis. I have ran there in a FWD years ago, and the track is way better. Plus it being at almost sea level I am expecting a low 13 second pass with my mods.
The only problem is that the KR would sticker for $75k and the ADM on one would be around $1million. LOL The best part is that the 650hp and 750hp Super Snake pkgs both cost $27k. So you can get 100hp more for "free" but lose your warranty. They way I look at it, if you can afford a $45k car plus what ever ADM is and then a $27k pkg I don't think you'll have a problem paying out if pocket for whatever might happen to car.
Yes but a V6 should still beable to 60' 2.0-2.1 You would have beat him either way but we're just saying it wouldn't have been as bad and that a 2.7 60' for a RWD car....well really any car is VERY VERY bad. LOl
Last edited by 04YellowGT; Aug 12, 2007 at 08:30 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I really do not know a whole lot about the v6 stangs, except that I would never buy one. I am not knocking those who do or have owned one, I am just the type of person that will always by the best of a particular model. If I were to trade my car in on a stang, it would be the GT500, but actually I would never buy one of those eather. Personally If I were to buy a stang, I would shop around and find me a 93 cobra, those are my favorite of all the mustangs.
Last edited by HViper; Aug 12, 2007 at 08:44 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I really do not know a whole lot about the v6 stangs, except that I would never buy one. I am not knocking those who do or have owned one, I am just the type of person that will always by the best of a particular model. If I were to trade my car in on a stang, it would be the GT500, but actually I would never buy one of those eather. Personally If I were to buy a stang, I would shop around and find me a 93 cobra, those are my favorite of all the mustangs.
You can beat from a dig if you heat your tires up, but be careful if you still got those perellis on, and another trick, when you get a little smoke, stop the car immediately, and start the race from where YOU are, i dont know why it works but it does, i guess it stops the tires from cooling down before you get to run. if you do this you can be a little more aggresive with your launch, and i do mean a LITTLE! Try it and you should jump a 1/2 car. Works for me.
The upper and lower intake had be cut, ported and then heli coiled back together, Pro M mass air, Smog system removed with a idler pully put in place, BBK throtle body, CAI, Long tube headers no cats X-Pipe into flowmasters (did not really matter though cause he had cut outs for the track after the header), T5 tremic with a centerforce 6 puck clutch and alum. flywheel, steeda short throw shifter with adjustable stops, 3.73 gears, mosier 32 spline axles, kenny brown subframe conectors, larger pulley kit for altinator and water pump (A/C was on there but not conected), alum. water pump, BFG DR's 295-45-R15's, and (the only mod I did not like but it was pratical so he could fit the proper tires) 15" american racing rims and we had to roll the fenders with a baseball bat so the tires would not rub. I did not like this due to him having to ditch the stock 17" cobra rims, but as fast as he went through tires this was a cheaper solution. Sticky tires were way cheaper for a 15" rim VS a 17" rim if you know what I mean. This car would pull the front wheels off the ground a few inches when launching, that is once he got his subfram conectors. I told him for like 6 months he needed them too, but it took him twisting the car until his front winsheild cracked and his passanger door would not open right before he finally bought them.
You can beat from a dig if you heat your tires up, but be careful if you still got those perellis on, and another trick, when you get a little smoke, stop the car immediately, and start the race from where YOU are, i dont know why it works but it does, i guess it stops the tires from cooling down before you get to run. if you do this you can be a little more aggresive with your launch, and i do mean a LITTLE! Try it and you should jump a 1/2 car. Works for me.
Last edited by HViper; Aug 12, 2007 at 09:12 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
93 Cobra R 351 FTW!!!!! I would love to have one of those!!!! The 93 cobras were still pretty fast though, ford way underrated them too. I had a friend that had one that would run low 12's to high 11's on DR's with nothing but boltons. Before you say BS I will list the mods that I can remember.
The upper and lower intake had be cut, ported and then heli coiled back together, Pro M mass air, Smog system removed with a idler pully put in place, BBK throtle body, CAI, Long tube headers no cats X-Pipe into flowmasters (did not really matter though cause he had cut outs for the track after the header), T5 tremic with a centerforce 6 puck clutch and alum. flywheel, steeda short throw shifter with adjustable stops, 3.73 gears, mosier 32 spline axles, kenny brown subframe conectors, larger pulley kit for altinator and water pump (A/C was on there but not conected), alum. water pump, BFG DR's 295-45-R15's, and (the only mod I did not like but it was pratical so he could fit the proper tires) 15" american racing rims and we had to roll the fenders with a baseball bat so the tires would not rub. I did not like this due to him having to ditch the stock 17" cobra rims, but as fast as he went through tires this was a cheaper solution. Sticky tires were way cheaper for a 15" rim VS a 17" rim if you know what I mean. This car would pull the front wheels off the ground a few inches when launching, that is once he got his subfram conectors. I told him for like 6 months he needed them too, but it took him twisting the car until his front winsheild cracked and his passanger door would not open right before he finally bought them.
The upper and lower intake had be cut, ported and then heli coiled back together, Pro M mass air, Smog system removed with a idler pully put in place, BBK throtle body, CAI, Long tube headers no cats X-Pipe into flowmasters (did not really matter though cause he had cut outs for the track after the header), T5 tremic with a centerforce 6 puck clutch and alum. flywheel, steeda short throw shifter with adjustable stops, 3.73 gears, mosier 32 spline axles, kenny brown subframe conectors, larger pulley kit for altinator and water pump (A/C was on there but not conected), alum. water pump, BFG DR's 295-45-R15's, and (the only mod I did not like but it was pratical so he could fit the proper tires) 15" american racing rims and we had to roll the fenders with a baseball bat so the tires would not rub. I did not like this due to him having to ditch the stock 17" cobra rims, but as fast as he went through tires this was a cheaper solution. Sticky tires were way cheaper for a 15" rim VS a 17" rim if you know what I mean. This car would pull the front wheels off the ground a few inches when launching, that is once he got his subfram conectors. I told him for like 6 months he needed them too, but it took him twisting the car until his front winsheild cracked and his passanger door would not open right before he finally bought them.
You can beat from a dig if you heat your tires up, but be careful if you still got those perellis on, and another trick, when you get a little smoke, stop the car immediately, and start the race from where YOU are, i dont know why it works but it does, i guess it stops the tires from cooling down before you get to run. if you do this you can be a little more aggresive with your launch, and i do mean a LITTLE! Try it and you should jump a 1/2 car. Works for me.
I mean, beside the fact that "heating up your tires" like that is actually TERRIBLE for them, you can do whatever the heck you want, you aren't going to beat a new GT from a dig, stock, vs. stock, unless the Mustang driver just plain SUCKS.
Actually, the '93 Cobra R's had the 302, just like the "regular" Cobras. In fact, it was the virtually the same engine... same claimed hp, etc. The '95 Cobra R, however, got the 351.
But yeah, you can make Fox Mustangs very fast for very little money.
From a dig, stock vs. stock, a new GT is going to smoke an SS/SC if the Mustang driver is competent... PERIOD.
I mean, beside the fact that "heating up your tires" like that is actually TERRIBLE for them, you can do whatever the heck you want, you aren't going to beat a new GT from a dig, stock, vs. stock, unless the Mustang driver just plain SUCKS.
I mean, beside the fact that "heating up your tires" like that is actually TERRIBLE for them, you can do whatever the heck you want, you aren't going to beat a new GT from a dig, stock, vs. stock, unless the Mustang driver just plain SUCKS.
Either way, heating up street tires is still bad, and doing so certainly won't guarantee the win, even against a 99-04 GT. Even AWESOME driving won't guarantee a win, because even the 99-04 GT's are CAPABLE of faster times. It's definitely a driver's race, though.
From a dig, stock vs. stock, a new GT is going to smoke an SS/SC if the Mustang driver is competent... PERIOD.
I mean, beside the fact that "heating up your tires" like that is actually TERRIBLE for them, you can do whatever the heck you want, you aren't going to beat a new GT from a dig, stock, vs. stock, unless the Mustang driver just plain SUCKS.
Actually, the '93 Cobra R's had the 302, just like the "regular" Cobras. In fact, it was the virtually the same engine... same claimed hp, etc. The '95 Cobra R, however, got the 351.
But yeah, you can make Fox Mustangs very fast for very little money.
I mean, beside the fact that "heating up your tires" like that is actually TERRIBLE for them, you can do whatever the heck you want, you aren't going to beat a new GT from a dig, stock, vs. stock, unless the Mustang driver just plain SUCKS.
Actually, the '93 Cobra R's had the 302, just like the "regular" Cobras. In fact, it was the virtually the same engine... same claimed hp, etc. The '95 Cobra R, however, got the 351.
But yeah, you can make Fox Mustangs very fast for very little money.
Last edited by cobaltss2006frank; Aug 14, 2007 at 01:28 AM. Reason: SPELLING
Actually it's a fact that it doesn't help traction. All street tires do is get greasy when you spin them. Seriously, I'm not making this up. Drag radials/slicks love heat, street tires aren't designed to do that.
From a dig, stock vs. stock, a new GT is going to smoke an SS/SC if the Mustang driver is competent... PERIOD.
I mean, beside the fact that "heating up your tires" like that is actually TERRIBLE for them, you can do whatever the heck you want, you aren't going to beat a new GT from a dig, stock, vs. stock, unless the Mustang driver just plain SUCKS.
Actually, the '93 Cobra R's had the 302, just like the "regular" Cobras. In fact, it was the virtually the same engine... same claimed hp, etc. The '95 Cobra R, however, got the 351.
But yeah, you can make Fox Mustangs very fast for very little money.
I mean, beside the fact that "heating up your tires" like that is actually TERRIBLE for them, you can do whatever the heck you want, you aren't going to beat a new GT from a dig, stock, vs. stock, unless the Mustang driver just plain SUCKS.
Actually, the '93 Cobra R's had the 302, just like the "regular" Cobras. In fact, it was the virtually the same engine... same claimed hp, etc. The '95 Cobra R, however, got the 351.
But yeah, you can make Fox Mustangs very fast for very little money.


