race wit a wack stang gt
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 08-31-08
Location: houston,tx
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
race wit a wack stang gt
i was playing video games at friends house n on my way home a raced a silver stang gt n i smoked em, the guy looked at me first like i wasnt even goin to be able to keep up, but suprised him tho i bet. and im new to this standard daily thing. shouldnt have done it tho cuz its still needs some time to brake in but man was it fun.lol
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-26-06
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think my cobalt is fast so don't try and argue with me.
#10
I see stock mustangs from 04 to 08 running 15's all day long at my local track
all in the driver
come to think of it i have video of my friends 2.4 running neck and neck with a later model GT.. the GT couldn't drive.
all in the driver
come to think of it i have video of my friends 2.4 running neck and neck with a later model GT.. the GT couldn't drive.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Clearly, his reference point was a car that he assumes to be faster than a 99-04 GT and slower than an 05+ GT.
An LS1 F-body is faster, yes, but it has nothing to do with this thread except that it is the victim of your Red Herring.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is that logic term I see?
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As another example of crappy driving, my stock-ish V6 Mustang ran neck and neck with an AMG E55 in the 1/8th mile. Clearly, that has no bearing on what the car is capable of or what SHOULD have happened.
#14
Yeah, driver is of utmost importance, and low 14's for a 99-04 Mustang generally assumes reasonable weather conditions and decent driving.
As another example of crappy driving, my stock-ish V6 Mustang ran neck and neck with an AMG E55 in the 1/8th mile. Clearly, that has no bearing on what the car is capable of or what SHOULD have happened.
As another example of crappy driving, my stock-ish V6 Mustang ran neck and neck with an AMG E55 in the 1/8th mile. Clearly, that has no bearing on what the car is capable of or what SHOULD have happened.
Which isn't an insult to anyone, because it takes practice. And I'm one of the ones who needs practice too .
And our local track is pretty crappy.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-26-06
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You bolded "04 and under are slow" and the proceeded to say "in comparison to what?"
All I am stating is that they are slow IN GENERAL... They are just flat out slow. So in comparison to ANY CAR not just one in particular and I don't think we were specifying in the first place.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-16-08
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nope.
I'm a mustang addict. had 6 of 'em before the cobalt (if you count parts cars, otherwise just 4)
just had to get something a little better in the snow, kept missing classes because of weather last year
I'm a mustang addict. had 6 of 'em before the cobalt (if you count parts cars, otherwise just 4)
just had to get something a little better in the snow, kept missing classes because of weather last year
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Red Herring lol... this isn't composition or philosophy
You bolded "04 and under are slow" and the proceeded to say "in comparison to what?"
All I am stating is that they are slow IN GENERAL... They are just flat out slow. So in comparison to ANY CAR not just one in particular and I don't think we were specifying in the first place.
You bolded "04 and under are slow" and the proceeded to say "in comparison to what?"
All I am stating is that they are slow IN GENERAL... They are just flat out slow. So in comparison to ANY CAR not just one in particular and I don't think we were specifying in the first place.
"critical thinking" and "logic" is the most useless, uninteresting, and non life altering information available to man kind!
In fact, this is the first time Ive heard that BS since I took a class on it! Congrats blainestang! You do css.net, and humanity proud!
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that was sarcasm....
I HATED that class with a passion. The professor acted as if he was teaching a class about curing cancer with a wave of your hand. The guy was an idiot, and he thought his 100 level class was a 600 level course.
Not to mention, the "logic" they present makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. I understood CALCULUS and GRAPHING ON THE Z-AXIS better than that stupid class.
I HATED that class with a passion. The professor acted as if he was teaching a class about curing cancer with a wave of your hand. The guy was an idiot, and he thought his 100 level class was a 600 level course.
Not to mention, the "logic" they present makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. I understood CALCULUS and GRAPHING ON THE Z-AXIS better than that stupid class.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-02-08
Location: Metro Detroit, Mi
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The SS/TC with a skilled driver would beat a stock Mustang GT (>04) from a dig, and most certainly from a roll. Even if the Mustang GT had a few bolt-ons I think the SS/TC would still have a good chance.
But yeah against a (>04) decently modded GT, or a 05+ Mustang GT, isn't going to happen stock...
LMAO! I feel you man. I'm a philosophy minor, and I took "ADVANCED LOGIC" an upper level course with no background in logic whatsoever, and I thought I was going to fail for sure. Especially when it came to doing proofs... Couldn't stand having to use inference rules, and studying predicate vs sentential logic, doing the various logic tests, etc. I managed to pull a B out of my ass in that course, and I'll never take anything ever related to logic again...
But yeah against a (>04) decently modded GT, or a 05+ Mustang GT, isn't going to happen stock...
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC;2826142I
HATED that class with a passion. The professor acted as if he was teaching a class about curing cancer with a wave of your hand. The guy was an idiot, and he thought his 100 level class was a 600 level course.
Not to mention, the "logic" they present makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. I understood CALCULUS and GRAPHING ON THE Z-AXIS better than that stupid class.
Not to mention, the "logic" they present makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. I understood CALCULUS and GRAPHING ON THE Z-AXIS better than that stupid class.
Last edited by SS4EVER; 09-02-2008 at 02:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: UNDER YOUR BED
Posts: 13,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The SS/TC with a skilled driver would beat a stock Mustang GT (>04) from a dig, and most certainly from a roll. Even if the Mustang GT had a few bolt-ons I think the SS/TC would still have a good chance.
But yeah against a 05+ Mustang GT, isn't going to happen stock...
LMAO! I feel you man. I'm a philosophy minor, and I took "ADVANCED LOGIC" an upper level course with no background in logic whatsoever, and I thought I was going to fail for sure. Especially when it came to doing proofs... Couldn't stand having to use inference rules, and studying predicate vs sentential logic, doing the various logic tests, etc. I managed to pull a B out of my ass in that course, and I'll never take anything ever related to logic again...
But yeah against a 05+ Mustang GT, isn't going to happen stock...
LMAO! I feel you man. I'm a philosophy minor, and I took "ADVANCED LOGIC" an upper level course with no background in logic whatsoever, and I thought I was going to fail for sure. Especially when it came to doing proofs... Couldn't stand having to use inference rules, and studying predicate vs sentential logic, doing the various logic tests, etc. I managed to pull a B out of my ass in that course, and I'll never take anything ever related to logic again...
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: 06-19-05
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Red Herring lol... this isn't composition or philosophy
You bolded "04 and under are slow" and the proceeded to say "in comparison to what?"
All I am stating is that they are slow IN GENERAL... They are just flat out slow. So in comparison to ANY CAR not just one in particular and I don't think we were specifying in the first place.
You bolded "04 and under are slow" and the proceeded to say "in comparison to what?"
All I am stating is that they are slow IN GENERAL... They are just flat out slow. So in comparison to ANY CAR not just one in particular and I don't think we were specifying in the first place.
I'm not suggesting that 99-04 GT's are "super fast" in comparison to a lot of cars out there, but they are not "flat out slow in comparison to any car." You're just making your point look even more ridiculous by making ignorant statements because you can't back up your claim with a legitimate argument.
Fact is, fast and slow are relative, and compared to cars that were in it's price class (you could buy a new one for $18k, if you knew where to look) and relative to the Cobalt SS's (the main subject of this site), they are not "slow" in the 1/4-mile.
that was sarcasm....
I HATED that class with a passion. The professor acted as if he was teaching a class about curing cancer with a wave of your hand. The guy was an idiot, and he thought his 100 level class was a 600 level course.
Not to mention, the "logic" they present makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. I understood CALCULUS and GRAPHING ON THE Z-AXIS better than that stupid class.
I HATED that class with a passion. The professor acted as if he was teaching a class about curing cancer with a wave of your hand. The guy was an idiot, and he thought his 100 level class was a 600 level course.
Not to mention, the "logic" they present makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE. I understood CALCULUS and GRAPHING ON THE Z-AXIS better than that stupid class.
Next time, I'll just say, "Your argument is irrelevant to the topic at hand" or something like that.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-02-08
Location: Metro Detroit, Mi
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At least ur professor didnt have a perpertual sandpaper ***** up his ass about the class. He started off the first day with " so many people come into this class thinking theyre going to not work, and this will be an easy A". Let me tell you, that homosexual midget had his ass buddies that gave him a reach around, then everyone else he said **** you to. Id love to rip that ****** earring out of his queer ear and gouge out both of his homoerotic eye sockets with it...
I've taken all my philosophy courses with the same professor, a really cool lady who does a great and thorough job. I even wait until she's teaching a course that I need just to take her. I just need two more upper level courses and the minor is all taken care of...
But yeah I feel you.