SS Camaro Vs. Me at the track

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 9, 2006 | 11:38 AM

#26

superSS/SC

Banned

Joined: 09-12-06

Posts: 610

Likes: 0

From: AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by codyss

I had two Camaro SS'S one 2000 (M6) and a 2002 (A4) I got the 2000 in the twelves before mods and the 2002 was .03 away from the 12's bone stock.

I like the 1996-1997 Camaro Z28 SS's looks a little better but a SS/WS6 is maybe .02 faster than the regular LT1's. Another thing I liked about LT1's was that the Auto was no slower than the M6 NO MATTER WHAT ANYONE HEARD.

As for the LS1 SS a fully SLP modified one would easily have 25hp over a regular LS1. The SLP/Bilstein suspension also brought the skidpad rating into the .92 to .94 area.

No SLP SS or Firehawk could come close to 12s at 5900ft.

Also when and where did a ls1 f-body pull a .94 skidpad or even a .92???

The BS flag has been risen.

Oct 10, 2006 | 08:47 AM

#27

codyss

Banned

Joined: 05-12-05

Posts: 2,698

Likes: 0

From: Nebraska

Awaken evil ricer boy superSS/SC!!!!!!!!!!

Are you ******* stupid kid?

And by the way look up what the $1000 SLP/Bilstein suspension adds before you pretend you know anything.

Here since I know your busy on SRT forums and STiloversareus.com I will post it for you.

SLP/Bilstein Suspension kit

- Bilstein 46mm shocks F/R (SLP specific valving)
- Eibach progressive springs (which also lowers the car 3/4)
- 35mm front sway bar and 21mm rear sway bar
- Harder durometer bushings in rear control arms (same as 1LE)

Keep in mind jackass that a stock SS with the F1 tires will pull a .88 - .89 and on BFG KD's will pull .89 - .90 with ease.

Well I won't keep you so you aren't late for school............

Oct 10, 2006 | 12:04 PM

#28

superSS/SC

Banned

Joined: 09-12-06

Posts: 610

Likes: 0

From: AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by codyss

I asked for PROOF and like always you provide nothing but insults. Wipe the cheesy poofs stained on your hands, get out of your parent's basement, and get a life.

Oct 10, 2006 | 12:14 PM

#29

patathSS

Senior Member

Joined: 09-15-05

Posts: 2,256

Likes: 0

From: OP, KS

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedlineBrian

The LS1 was created by the big guy himself. Haha.

A picture for all the LS1 nuthuggers out there....

Oct 10, 2006 | 12:25 PM

#30

superSS/SC

Banned

Joined: 09-12-06

Posts: 610

Likes: 0

From: AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by patathSS

A picture for all the LS1 nuthuggers out there....

Hey how are your M&H's???

Oct 10, 2006 | 01:56 PM

#31

leviticus88

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: 02-22-06

Posts: 1,730

Likes: 0

From: Colorado

Don't get my F-ing thread locked!

I have never seen a stock LS1 get in the 12's at 5900ft, Im sure it's possible at sea level though.

The SLP package sounds bad ass and I'm sure it does a lot but why are you arguing about skid pad numbers?

Please, name calling is just lame...

Oct 10, 2006 | 01:57 PM

#32

leviticus88

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: 02-22-06

Posts: 1,730

Likes: 0

From: Colorado

Quote:

Originally Posted by patathSS

A picture for all the LS1 nuthuggers out there....

Oct 11, 2006 | 08:40 AM

#33

codyss

Banned

Joined: 05-12-05

Posts: 2,698

Likes: 0

From: Nebraska

Sorry I shouldn't have used some of those words I wasn't thinking. I just let internet morons get under my skin much to easily.

Oct 11, 2006 | 12:12 PM

#34

superSS/SC

Banned

Joined: 09-12-06

Posts: 610

Likes: 0

From: AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by codyss

Sorry I shouldn't have used some of those words I wasn't thinking. I just let internet morons get under my skin much to easily.

Then stop being one.

Oct 12, 2006 | 01:49 PM

#35

1fstss

Senior Member

Joined: 04-17-06

Posts: 814

Likes: 0

From: Bay City, michigan

at sea level a FULLY LOADED SS or fire hawk can hit 12's on a perfect day and the SS didnt return untill 1996, and wasnt available with the LT4 untill 97 and only 101 where made with the LT4.