2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.
View Poll Results: Am I safe w/ 42's w/ my 2.8?
Yes. 42's should be just fine w/ your 2.8
13
52.00%
No.
12
48.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Been gone for awhile, but I know this question has probably been asked MANY times.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #1  
l Sh1ft l's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-24-06
Posts: 2,191
Likes: 0
From: Canton Ohio
Been gone for awhile, but I know this question has probably been asked MANY times.

What's the scoop w/ stage 2 and the 2.8 and 42lb injectors? Are people having significant problems with it? Is the majority having no problems? I've been gone for to long to see or hear problems w/ it. I'm trying to stay under warranty and don't want to get screwed or pay more than I need to. Th
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #2  
Acidangel_5.0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-25-06
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
From: Dacula, Georgia
2.8 + 60
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 03:54 PM
  #3  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
2.8 is really the limit of how far you should go with 42's. Some folks have been running around with the setup with no problems.

Recently the trend seems to be that in the upper RPM ranges the injector duty cycle is getting close to or going over 100%... very bad. Ideally you want the IDC to be around 80% max... or you risk having your injectors lock open.

Personally... I'm not gonna go that far. 2.9 with the 42's is as far as I'm going.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #4  
DressBoyBlues's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-12-07
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Owosso
you should be fine i think "Intense is running that and their getting 263whp and 247torque with header,downpipe and pcm reprogram,stage 2 belt.

Originally Posted by DressBoyBlues
you should be fine i think "Intense is running that and their getting 263whp and 247torque with header,downpipe and pcm reprogram,stage 2 belt.
but for a extra 20 bucks i guess u could go 60, just in case u want to go smaller pulley lata down the road

Last edited by DressBoyBlues; Mar 2, 2007 at 03:57 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #5  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
Originally Posted by DressBoyBlues
you should be fine i think "Intense is running that and their getting 263whp and 247torque with header,downpipe and pcm reprogram,stage 2 belt.

but for a extra 20 bucks i guess u could go 60, just in case u want to go smaller pulley lata down the road
Nothing personal here at all... but I distinctly remember reading quite a few threads lately about how Intense's "can" tunes are crappy and need to be re-worked right out of the box. Lotsa peoples cars breaking.

If you're worried about warranty at all... go GM Stage two... toss on a 2.9... you'll be fine.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #6  
blackngold20's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, VA from Pittsburgh, Pa
oh no...you gotta go with 60lbs. If you use 42lbs you're going to work them to thir peak potential. Thats not what you want to do.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:23 PM
  #7  
Screamin!'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-06
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: Manteno, IL
not again.... ill check back when this thread hits 8-9 pages.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:33 PM
  #8  
retrop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-26-05
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore
Originally Posted by Screamin!
not again.... ill check back when this thread hits 8-9 pages.
Agreed.....people just throw out universal rules that don't apply to eveyone.

The 2.8 and 42 argument has many factors that people tend to ignore like temperature, altitude and if you ever run your car over 6000rpm, which some people don't....

Being real close to sea level and at about 50 degrees over 6200 rpm the 42's are over 100% duty cycle, but i rarely run my car that far, most of the time i stay under 4K. Someone going to chime in and tell me that I can't run my 2.8 safely for my situation???

So for everyone telling him no you can't or yes you can SHUT UP, its not that simple.....
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2007 | 04:52 PM
  #9  
SSdan's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-17-06
Posts: 6,266
Likes: 1
From: between heaven and hell
Ok some actual dyno performance and experience.

Last weekend, i dyno'd my car at 244whp and 220lb torque. Im running GM stage 2, Injen CAI, Ark catback exhaust, and a 2.8" pulley.

Before 6grand, my AF was where it should be, After 6 grand, it ended up going crazy and running lean as ****. I actually got a lean misfire, which is known to take out pistons.

Needless to say, my car barely goes over 5k now. Until I get it tuned, it will not be seeing 6k and it won't see much boost, if any at all either. Gas Mileage FTW!!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 01:12 AM
  #10  
DressBoyBlues's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-12-07
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Owosso
well i guess ill have to go with the 60's then b/c u guys are smarter then me so ya and ill have to rethink the whole intense pcm i might just have to follow the trend and get the hptuner....
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2007 | 01:43 AM
  #11  
spaz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 1
From: Calgary,Canada
what is the altitude where you are? 42's and the 2.8 here in Calgary at 3500 feet above sealevel is ok.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fearedbynone
South Central
1
Apr 14, 2016 03:25 AM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
8
Oct 28, 2015 06:09 PM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
Oct 21, 2015 07:04 AM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
SSLOW06
Complete Cars
1
Oct 1, 2015 07:21 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.