2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

People who are 2.6 pulley'd???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #1  
HOT CARLS SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-07
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ont.
People who are 2.6 pulley'd???

Question:

I am running a 2.7 pulley and I am running 16 degrees of timing down low and about 18.5 degrees of timing up top at 7000-7200rpms with no kr without meth only a large front mount HE.

If I running a 2.6 how much timing can I run down low and up top vs 2.7??? Ie: 16degrees down low ---- 17 up top without meth???

THanx

Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #2  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
What octane are you using. Its tough to say there are a lot of variables. Best bet is to put the ring on and try it out. I've cranked 19* out of the old 2.5" pulled setup on 93 with no meth.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 12:05 PM
  #3  
HOT CARLS SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-07
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ont.
How much timing did you run down low...say before 5 psi boost?? did you notice big difference in tq??
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 12:07 PM
  #4  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
I only ran a 2.5" from day 6. I went from stock to 2.5" so i can't answer the question directly, but inderictly no it won't be that large of a difference maybe 5~8 wtq at best
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #5  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
what are your IAT2 temps with no meth and a 2.6"???
I'm running a 2.8" with just a front mount h/e for cooling and my iat2 hits 145 after a pass down the 1320'
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #6  
HOT CARLS SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-07
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ont.
What kinda whp/wtq did you make with your setup lsjwannabe?? I am looking for around 280-285whp and 250-260wtq....with meth / large front mount HE on 94 Sunoco mabe 265whp without meth
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 01:19 PM
  #7  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
253whp/235 wtq trapped 110 in the 1/4

don't shoot for dyno imo they don't mean much. I have seen guys make well over 60 whp more than me and trap 107. They all read different and should only be used for a comparison between your car alone.

Depending on what type of dyno you use the numbers will vary.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 01:55 PM
  #8  
HOT CARLS SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-07
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ont.
What size of pulley were you using too make those numbers?? That was without meth, HE etc right?? I see Denny made 258whp/250wtq on a 2.6
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #9  
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-06
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by HOT CARLS SS
Question:

I am running a 2.7 pulley and I am running 16 degrees of timing down low and about 18.5 degrees of timing up top at 7000-7200rpms with no kr without meth only a large front mount HE.

If I running a 2.6 how much timing can I run down low and up top vs 2.7??? Ie: 16degrees down low ---- 17 up top without meth???

THanx

Stick with the 2.7, get meth and be able to run even quicker.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #10  
coopn8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Southern Ohio
Your saying a 2.7 meth car will pull a 2.6 meth car?

Just curious if that's what you meant by stick with the 2.7 get me and be even quicker
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 05:58 PM
  #11  
dbtk2's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-12-07
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming, MI
Timing will make more power than pulley. A smaller pulley takes power to make power. Because of this running more timing is going to give a greater gain than running a smaller pulley. I say increase the timing to 20ish and go to a 2.8 pulley. More boost does not necessarily mean more power.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 06:22 PM
  #12  
coopn8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Southern Ohio
Crazy talk. I love my 2.6 and nothing you say will make me stop using it
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 10:42 PM
  #13  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
anyone wanna share their iat2 temps with a 2.5", 2.6", or 2.7" pulley???
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 11:01 PM
  #14  
coopn8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Southern Ohio
150 iat2 after 3 WOT pulls on 2.6. Only cooling is meth with a 3 gph nozzle. Lower with bigger bozzle
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 05:21 PM
  #15  
HOT CARLS SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-07
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ont.
Not bad...what are your dyno numbers cooper..????
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #16  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by Bika
what are your IAT2 temps with no meth and a 2.6"???
I'm running a 2.8" with just a front mount h/e for cooling and my iat2 hits 145 after a pass down the 1320'
yikes, you need the stu mod
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #17  
coopn8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Southern Ohio
Haven't dynoed on the 2.6 actually. Stage 2+ spec clutch went in today. When it gets back I'm doing some. Uh. Tasteful mods. Ill have dyno numbers within 2 weeks and ill definately start a thread!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 07:24 PM
  #18  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
yikes, you need the stu mod
I tried to do the Stu mod but the tank leaked and i didnt have large enough hoses. you should make another one and sell it to me
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 07:30 PM
  #19  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
If already have a 2.7", skip the 2.6" and go for the 2.5". I was like LSJWannbe, my car went from stock to 2.5" ring in less than a week. I tried using a 2.7", but couldn't stand the TQ loss, didn't last more than 2 hours. Peak HP will be the same across the pullies, but it will just come on sooner, more low end TQ.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #20  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
more low end torque, at the expense of blower damage, and alot of heat that can damage an engine. Is it really worth it?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #21  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by Bika
I tried to do the Stu mod but the tank leaked and i didnt have large enough hoses. you should make another one and sell it to me
just say the word and i will make one. pm me if you really do want one
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 08:19 PM
  #22  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Bika
more low end torque, at the expense of blower damage, and alot of heat that can damage an engine. Is it really worth it?
There are a lot of variables. I've said it many times, there are about 6-7 cars around here that run 2.5" pullies for over 2 years now. All with the same tune. Still run fine no problems.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #23  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
I know a 2.5" is not inherently an lsj death sentence. but I didnt think its something that any n00b can throw on and have no problems
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
Jesse
Parts
22
Oct 20, 2015 09:56 PM
Builttss
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
9
Oct 4, 2015 10:21 AM
SSLOW06
Complete Cars
1
Oct 1, 2015 07:21 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:07 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 PM.