Stock TC vs 06 Mustang GT
The SS/TC is also drive by wire. It just so happens Ford have a bunch of idiots programming the drive by wire systems. There's throttle lag, throttle dead space, and sometimes even throttle hang. GM isn't any better, but the SS/TC system is programmed so well that I couldn't feel any throttle lag or dead space or hang. The Mazdaspeed3 is also free of these problems and is drive by wire.
With just an intake/tune, my SS/TC pulls my intake/exhaust/tune 05 GT by a few cars. Before the intake/tune, the SS/TC couldnt keep up, not from a dig, or roll. Once I get my car back from the dealership I wanna race it again, just to see if the catless DP helped out.
From a roll they arent that great, unless modded. I'm sure you just aswell as everyone else knows that they can and have ran 13.5-13.6 in the 1/4 mile stock, which is good enough to beat an SS/TC stock. From a roll I'm sure both the SS/SC and SS/TC could take one stock vs stock. I'm just happy to have a few mods on my SS/TC.
he let me drive his car and i let him drive mine a few days ago. We both agreed that mine felt faster. (The stang hardly put me in my seat) Who knows maybe the car was just running crappy that night. On the another note, its been colder then what it was that night and my car feels alot faster now and im getting the itch to run him again.
Before we really started to race i was just messing with him from like 30 rolls and i was pulling almost a car length on him by the time i got to 60 then stopped. Then when it came down to a real race i dunno what happen.
Before we really started to race i was just messing with him from like 30 rolls and i was pulling almost a car length on him by the time i got to 60 then stopped. Then when it came down to a real race i dunno what happen.
Set up a race then meet up with me before hand and I'll flash the Superchips tune to your car lol......See how bad you beat him then .... he won't know what happened. It takes 2 minutes and can be pulled off after the race with no one the wiser.
From a roll they arent that great, unless modded. I'm sure you just aswell as everyone else knows that they can and have ran 13.5-13.6 in the 1/4 mile stock, which is good enough to beat an SS/TC stock. From a roll I'm sure both the SS/SC and SS/TC could take one stock vs stock. I'm just happy to have a few mods on my SS/TC.
The stock GT manuals have 3.55s as standard or optional. The stock GT automatics have 3.31s
Everyone that has upgraded to 3.73 or 4.10 rear axle ratios commented that the car should have come from the factory with these gears.
The SS/TC takes off very well but there is the issue of turbo lag. My GT also seems to bog down below 3000 RPM, but the overall feel of the GT and SS/TC are about the same in terms of acceleration. The GT is supposed to do the 0-60 in 4.9 to 5.3 seconds with the SS/TC at about 5.6-6 seconds. The 05-09 GTs are running the 1/4 in low to mid 13s stock, mostly mid to high 13s.
In terms of agility, braking, and "fun", the SS/TC wins hands down. Anyone that disagrees obviously hasn't driven a SS/TC.
Everyone that has upgraded to 3.73 or 4.10 rear axle ratios commented that the car should have come from the factory with these gears.
The SS/TC takes off very well but there is the issue of turbo lag. My GT also seems to bog down below 3000 RPM, but the overall feel of the GT and SS/TC are about the same in terms of acceleration. The GT is supposed to do the 0-60 in 4.9 to 5.3 seconds with the SS/TC at about 5.6-6 seconds. The 05-09 GTs are running the 1/4 in low to mid 13s stock, mostly mid to high 13s.
In terms of agility, braking, and "fun", the SS/TC wins hands down. Anyone that disagrees obviously hasn't driven a SS/TC.
The stock GT manuals have 3.55s as standard or optional. The stock GT automatics have 3.31s
Everyone that has upgraded to 3.73 or 4.10 rear axle ratios commented that the car should have come from the factory with these gears.
The SS/TC takes off very well but there is the issue of turbo lag. My GT also seems to bog down below 3000 RPM, but the overall feel of the GT and SS/TC are about the same in terms of acceleration. The GT is supposed to do the 0-60 in 4.9 to 5.3 seconds with the SS/TC at about 5.6-6 seconds. The 05-09 GTs are running the 1/4 in low to mid 13s stock, mostly mid to high 13s.
In terms of agility, braking, and "fun", the SS/TC wins hands down. Anyone that disagrees obviously hasn't driven a SS/TC.
Everyone that has upgraded to 3.73 or 4.10 rear axle ratios commented that the car should have come from the factory with these gears.
The SS/TC takes off very well but there is the issue of turbo lag. My GT also seems to bog down below 3000 RPM, but the overall feel of the GT and SS/TC are about the same in terms of acceleration. The GT is supposed to do the 0-60 in 4.9 to 5.3 seconds with the SS/TC at about 5.6-6 seconds. The 05-09 GTs are running the 1/4 in low to mid 13s stock, mostly mid to high 13s.
In terms of agility, braking, and "fun", the SS/TC wins hands down. Anyone that disagrees obviously hasn't driven a SS/TC.
His best time is 13.5 with a 60' of 2.0 103 mph (he usually runs high 13's though)
I still have yet to break into the 13's
***********************
I did some more highway rolls with him today..... about 45 mph
He were dead even... I mean DEAD even all the way to about 120 then i started pullin very slightly and called it quits. He had a passenger in the car though and i did not. What i don't understand is how people are beating these stock unless my engine isn't quite putting out the same power as the rest of you.
Anyhow, i'm getting stage 1 put in next week so i should pull on him.. but it will be interesting to see how much.
I did beat a dodge charger r/t (5.7L) though.. we both spun pretty bad but I freakin short shifted into 2nd gear...
Took me over 100 mph to finally pass him to make up for my mistake
Last edited by rckrz6; Oct 25, 2009 at 11:44 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
My best time is 14.25 with a 60' of 2.3x 102 mph
His best time is 13.5 with a 60' of 2.0 103 mph (he usually runs high 13's though)
I still have yet to break into the 13's
***********************
I did some more highway rolls with him today..... about 45 mph
He were dead even... I mean DEAD even all the way to about 120 then i started pullin very slightly and called it quits. He had a passenger in the car though and i did not. What i don't understand is how people are beating these stock unless my engine isn't quite putting out the same power as the rest of you.
Anyhow, i'm getting stage 1 put in next week so i should pull on him.. but it will be interesting to see how much.
I did beat a dodge charger r/t (5.7L) though.. we both spun pretty bad but I freakin short shifted into 2nd gear...
Took me over 100 mph to finally pass him to make up for my mistake
His best time is 13.5 with a 60' of 2.0 103 mph (he usually runs high 13's though)
I still have yet to break into the 13's
***********************
I did some more highway rolls with him today..... about 45 mph
He were dead even... I mean DEAD even all the way to about 120 then i started pullin very slightly and called it quits. He had a passenger in the car though and i did not. What i don't understand is how people are beating these stock unless my engine isn't quite putting out the same power as the rest of you.
Anyhow, i'm getting stage 1 put in next week so i should pull on him.. but it will be interesting to see how much.
I did beat a dodge charger r/t (5.7L) though.. we both spun pretty bad but I freakin short shifted into 2nd gear...
Took me over 100 mph to finally pass him to make up for my mistakeDepending on the weight of the person it has little or no effect at all on a V8. 100lbs = 1/10 of a second in the quarter mile. barley enough to make a difference like you were experiencing. Also i have not had the GT problem....or a WRX....Or a forrester(with an STI badge on it WTF) or a Camaro..(92)...
1 automatic
2manuals
I put buses on one of them. the other 2 were alittle more challenging. but still beat them by 3cars or more.
Im stock still. i can launch my car pretty good from a dig.
With just an intake/tune, my SS/TC pulls my intake/exhaust/tune 05 GT by a few cars. Before the intake/tune, the SS/TC couldnt keep up, not from a dig, or roll. Once I get my car back from the dealership I wanna race it again, just to see if the catless DP helped out.
i have raced a few. none of them had anything special just the normal. intake, exhaust.
1 automatic
2manuals
I put buses on one of them. the other 2 were alittle more challenging. but still beat them by 3cars or more.
Im stock still. i can launch my car pretty good from a dig.
1 automatic
2manuals
I put buses on one of them. the other 2 were alittle more challenging. but still beat them by 3cars or more.
Im stock still. i can launch my car pretty good from a dig.
i have raced a few. none of them had anything special just the normal. intake, exhaust.
1 automatic
2manuals
I put buses on one of them. the other 2 were alittle more challenging. but still beat them by 3cars or more.
Im stock still. i can launch my car pretty good from a dig.
1 automatic
2manuals
I put buses on one of them. the other 2 were alittle more challenging. but still beat them by 3cars or more.
Im stock still. i can launch my car pretty good from a dig.
On the street, I find my 07 Mustang GT lacks low end torque. It NEEDS a more aggressive rear axle ratio to launch better. I have 3.55s stock, but with the trans gearing and tire size, I'd estimate 4.10s or 4.56s are in order.
The Cobalt suffers from a bit of turbo lag, especially if you're not launching from first gear. It's hard to describe but if you were doing say, 30 MPH and wanted to accelerate HARD, you'd go into 2nd gear and bog down severely. The owner's manual says not to downshift into 1st above 15 MPH or so.
My Crown Vic actually launches harder than the GT and Cobalt, probably due to its insane gearing setup from the factory. At 75 MPH in overdrive with the converter locked, my engine is churning at nearly 3000 RPM (4.6L V8). (2.84:1 first gear, 3.55 rear).
The Cobalt suffers from a bit of turbo lag, especially if you're not launching from first gear. It's hard to describe but if you were doing say, 30 MPH and wanted to accelerate HARD, you'd go into 2nd gear and bog down severely. The owner's manual says not to downshift into 1st above 15 MPH or so.
My Crown Vic actually launches harder than the GT and Cobalt, probably due to its insane gearing setup from the factory. At 75 MPH in overdrive with the converter locked, my engine is churning at nearly 3000 RPM (4.6L V8). (2.84:1 first gear, 3.55 rear).
yeh. i usally live at the track
Last edited by Mike08ss/tc; Oct 27, 2009 at 07:57 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
ok i got stage one.
I put about a bus length on him now by the time i hit 110 or so doing highway rolls.
You guys think that putting a downpipe and intake on there will get me 300 hp to the crank?
I put about a bus length on him now by the time i hit 110 or so doing highway rolls.
You guys think that putting a downpipe and intake on there will get me 300 hp to the crank?
i have raced a few. none of them had anything special just the normal. intake, exhaust.
1 automatic
2manuals
I put buses on one of them. the other 2 were alittle more challenging. but still beat them by 3cars or more.
Im stock still. i can launch my car pretty good from a dig.
1 automatic
2manuals
I put buses on one of them. the other 2 were alittle more challenging. but still beat them by 3cars or more.
Im stock still. i can launch my car pretty good from a dig.
Most people are putting down over 300hp to the wheels with intake, downpipe and a tune.
Last edited by FutureEcotecOwner; Nov 1, 2009 at 05:01 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost


