08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

why an lnf???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #26  
Micone's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-13-07
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Bremerton, WA
Originally Posted by JPizzle
I sure hope it whistles (spools) like a bitch! But, I highly doubt it....
It's gonna sound like a Shop Vac motor...
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #27  
JPizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-28-06
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, fl
Originally Posted by Micone
It's gonna sound like a Shop Vac motor...
No. I don't think so... (God I hope not.........) If so....
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #28  
Micone's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-13-07
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Bremerton, WA
Originally Posted by JPizzle
No. I don't think so... (God I hope not.........) If so....
ROFL. I hope not too but with GM going broke I can't imagine its going to be a very strong Turbo. It does have more HP than my car does so I gotta respect it.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #29  
greekss's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-26-06
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
i like the lnf idea...i want to look into swapping out the goods...ie the rims are nice, the brakes, the seats, and if there is some way to transfer the no lift shift feature that would be awesome too....
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 09:46 PM
  #30  
Micone's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-13-07
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Bremerton, WA
They have the no Lift Shift feature? That's pretty sweet. I do like the wheels and brakes, I prefer my leather seats though to the cloth in the new ones.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #31  
05redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Originally Posted by Greased
people want the turbo balt cuz its already set up for a turbo and with a turbo the skys the limit.
Not with GM's direct injection.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #32  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by Greased
people want the turbo balt cuz its already set up for a turbo and with a turbo the skys the limit. with a blower however you have many limits, like heat soak from over spinning and more parasitic loss that come swith big blowers
again, what about the maxed out tranny? there's more factors than just the car having a turbo on it. remember, this is gm, and they do some really silly things.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:12 PM
  #33  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by 05redline
Originally Posted by Greased
people want the turbo balt cuz its already set up for a turbo and with a turbo the skys the limit. ......
Not with GM's direct injection.
That's the truth.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #34  
Micone's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-13-07
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Bremerton, WA
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
again, what about the maxed out tranny? there's more factors than just the car having a turbo on it. remember, this is gm, and they do some really silly things.
The maxed out Tranny will be brittle and when you take it in to get fixed under warrenty they are gonna say it's due to racing and you'll be screwed...
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:14 PM
  #35  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by Micone
The maxed out Tranny will be brittle and when you take it in to get fixed under warrenty they are gonna say it's due to racing and you'll be screwed...
yep. another beutiful idea by gm. let's make a tranny that can't hold more than stock torque. i've been saying it for a while, and i have a big feeling that this cars going to be a HUGE disapointment. what good is a car if you have to spend 5,000 to swap a tranny before you can mod?
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:17 PM
  #36  
srowler9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-07
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
yep. another beutiful idea by gm. let's make a tranny that can't hold more than stock torque. i've been saying it for a while, and i have a big feeling that this cars going to be a HUGE disapointment. what good is a car if you have to spend 5,000 to swap a tranny before you can mod?
Good point. That is why I started this thread called : "Why the lnf" I think people just want something new
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:20 PM
  #37  
2fastSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
lol why is everyone already hating on a car that hasnt even come out yet?? I mean damn i can tell you right now im considering the car because i dont have to spend a **** load to get a good tune just so my car will run right if i would turbo it, then there is no warranty no reliability no nothing you just have to keep pouring money into the bitch

100,000 mile warranty compared to my 36,000 mile warranty i mean come on now....
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #38  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
people just look at the turbo, and think it must be an awesome car. just having a turbo doesn't mean anything. does anyone know that wants to buy this car know the limits of the turbo? do they realize how much of an absolute bitch this car will be to tune? i think people are expecting to buy this car, and put down 300 whp with no work, and that's not going to happen. you have to look at more than jsut the turbo. how much can the internals hold before they have to be upgraded? are they at or close to their limits like the tranny? these are things that people need to look into. look at how hard it is to get the cobalt above 270 whp. how many people on this site have more than 270, a handful? and the car has been out for 3 years. i think the next gen cobalt will have the same bad luck. i mean realistically who can afford to dish out all the money to invest to make the cobalt sturdy enough to start acually adding power. if you had that much money, you probably wouldn't be buying a cobalt. if the tranny thing is true, and you have to swap that out, and do some other supporting mods, you're now in evo price range.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #39  
srowler9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-07
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
lol why is everyone already hating on a car that hasnt even come out yet?? I mean damn i can tell you right now im considering the car because i dont have to spend a **** load to get a good tune just so my car will run right if i would turbo it, then there is no warranty no reliability no nothing you just have to keep pouring money into the bitch

100,000 mile warranty compared to my 36,000 mile warranty i mean come on now....
I have 07 and 100,000 mile warranty. Unless they beef up the tranny, the car will be just as restricted as the sc.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:24 PM
  #40  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
lol why is everyone already hating on a car that hasnt even come out yet?? I mean damn i can tell you right now im considering the car because i dont have to spend a **** load to get a good tune just so my car will run right if i would turbo it, then there is no warranty no reliability no nothing you just have to keep pouring money into the bitch

100,000 mile warranty compared to my 36,000 mile warranty i mean come on now....
i'm not hating, just saying that people are building it up too much without looking at ALL the facts. they're just seeing a turbo, and looking at other cars that have turbos, and assuming there's so much room for upgrades. let's let the car come out before we all jump to conclusions.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #41  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
people just look at the turbo, and think it must be an awesome car. just having a turbo doesn't mean anything. does anyone know that wants to buy this car know the limits of the turbo? do they realize how much of an absolute bitch this car will be to tune? i think people are expecting to buy this car, and put down 300 whp with no work, and that's not going to happen. you have to look at more than jsut the turbo. how much can the internals hold before they have to be upgraded? are they at or close to their limits like the tranny? these are things that people need to look into. look at how hard it is to get the cobalt above 270 whp. how many people on this site have more than 270, a handful? and the car has been out for 3 years. i think the next gen cobalt will have the same bad luck. i mean realistically who can afford to dish out all the money to invest to make the cobalt sturdy enough to start acually adding power. if you had that much money, you probably wouldn't be buying a cobalt. if the tranny thing is true, and you have to swap that out, and do some other supporting mods, you're now in evo price range.
its getting the same tranny as the ss/sc, and that tranny BY GM IS RATED AT 285TQ! (number could be off a bit)

THATS RATED BY GENERAL MOTORS!!!!! THE COMPANY THAT PRODUCES THESE VEHICLES!!!

for the people that expect to get huge horsepower numbers (above 300) good luck to you , and prepare to invest alot into a new tranny...

theres not ALOT of major downsides to the 2.0L Cobalts, but one is the tranny..its not a simple numbers game (in terms of horsepower) you have to look at all the other factors like stated in the post above
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #42  
JPizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-28-06
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, fl
I know, that I am only getting the new car because my warranty starts over, it's a new car, it has a turbo, it has a boost gauge, it has a 160 mph speedo, it has pretty neat seats, it has the lip kit, it has a short throw shifter, it's possible in the future to have an atmospheric BOV.

The list goes on for me, but the main reason, is the SOUND of a turbo/BOV/wastegate.

The only performance mods I plan are: Intake, Exhaust (dual), Headers, Downpipe, Intercooler piping, maybe a new intercooler, & a GM stage kit (if one is made).
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #43  
Brandon97Z's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-13-04
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Aren't the f23's rated to sumthing like 155 or 185tq? And there are f23 equipped cars running 11's
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #44  
da_kage's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-28-07
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Lethbridge/Edmonton, Alberta
Originally Posted by Jared B
ya it maxes out at 20psi
PSI doesn't matter, its all about the amount of air the turbo moves.

You can have a CT26 pushing 18psi, or a larger TD07-25g pushing 10psi that move the same amount of air.

(sorry for using the CT26, I used to have a MR2 and that is the stock turbo on the 3SGTE)

All that matters is the amount of air a turbo can move, regardless of "PSI".
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:33 PM
  #45  
DeftonesFan867's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-04
Posts: 7,059
Likes: 0
From: Henryville, PA
Threads like these are ridiculous. The OP isn't open to opinions when he's already determined the car is nothing special in HIS eyes. As for all this "GM is in trouble or GM is broke talk", please learn to read about whats REALLY going on with GM besides what the media is telling you, and don't bring up the 39 billion loss to me because I've already explained it.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #46  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
Aren't the f23's rated to sumthing like 155 or 185tq? And there are f23 equipped cars running 11's
you mean the trannies in the 2.2/2.4??
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #47  
srowler9's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-07
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Originally Posted by DeftonesFan867
Threads like these are ridiculous. The OP isn't open to opinions when he's already determined the car is nothing special in HIS eyes. As for all this "GM is in trouble or GM is broke talk", please learn to read about whats REALLY going on with GM besides what the media is telling you, and don't bring up the 39 billion loss to me because I've already explained it.

no, i stated i was confused. i didn't state any opinions
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #48  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by DeftonesFan867
Threads like these are ridiculous. The OP isn't open to opinions when he's already determined the car is nothing special in HIS eyes. As for all this "GM is in trouble or GM is broke talk", please learn to read about whats REALLY going on with GM besides what the media is telling you, and don't bring up the 39 billion loss to me because I've already explained it.
GM is the largest car manufacture in the world if im not mistaken (could be) and is doing very strong right now...not just in north america but in the world
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #49  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
guys, check this link. shows the F35 that will be in the cobalt, and IS in the hhrss, and shows the max torque to be 258. that being said, technically the tranny is OVER the power limit from the factory. it's down towards the bottom of the page, here's the info for the lazy ones:

http://www.gminsidenews.com/index.php?page=trans_guide

Type: transverse front wheel drive, five speed manual transaxle.

Engine Range: 2.0L
Max Gearbox Torque: 258 lb.-ft.

Weight: 99 lbs.

Applications: Chevrolet Cobalt SS, Chevrolet HHR SS
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #50  
Projekt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 24,270
Likes: 1
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
guys, check this link. shows the F35 that will be in the cobalt, and IS in the hhrss, and shows the max torque to be 258. that being said, technically the tranny is OVER the power limit from the factory. it's down towards the bottom of the page, here's the info for the lazy ones:

http://www.gminsidenews.com/index.php?page=trans_guide

Type: transverse front wheel drive, five speed manual transaxle.

Engine Range: 2.0L
Max Gearbox Torque: 258 lb.-ft.

Weight: 99 lbs.

Applications: Chevrolet Cobalt SS, Chevrolet HHR SS
thanks that was the post i was looking for
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.