2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Bypass Valve fix/Possible Boost Mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2009, 01:00 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
pookie025's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-10-09
Location: east hartford, connecticut
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
did you remove the tank? i did what u said and it worked but i didn't remove the tank and the spare hoses are just chillin there. the cel went away after i disconnected the negative battery. surge was reduced also. the cra seems to run better/smoother. i dosent buck between shifts and has more throttle responce. alot compressor surge was reduced
Old 10-08-2009, 01:43 PM
  #77  
Senior Member
 
Zander916's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-08
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have a couple pics about removing the tank. I got it out although it's a little bit PIA cause the oil dipstick is RIGHT in the way of one bolt. Then made a short vid just to explain what we're doing with the tank bypass. Working on getting them ready.

EDIT: Vid is still waiting for youtube.

REMOVING THE TANK. (assuming you've completed the vacuum tank bypass mod) Views in the pictures are the front of the car is the bottom of the pic and engine to the top of the pic. I'm laying with my legs hanging out under the front bumper.

1- Jack up the front of the car
2- Get underneath. The tank sits under the intake manifold, above the starter, behind the dipstick. (see pic)


3- Use a 10mm socket with long extension (I used my 6" but probably could have used shorter. I just couldn't find the other) and remove the DRIVERS side bolt first. (see pic)


4- Because it's a tight squeeze and the dipstick is positioned almost dead center of the passenger side bolt. Push up on the drivers side of the tank to tilt it. This will get the tank out of the way to give you more access. (see pic)


5- For the last bolt you don't need an extension. Just need to be a little flexible and be patient.

Vid just to explain what we're doing coming soon hopefully.

Last edited by Zander916; 10-08-2009 at 02:19 PM.
Old 10-08-2009, 02:07 PM
  #78  
Senior Member
 
Stamina's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-09-09
Location: Tejas
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Why go through the trouble of taking it off?... It doesn't weigh a thing. If the hoses bother you, just disconnect them.
Old 10-08-2009, 02:09 PM
  #79  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
cmiller8006's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-08
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I tried this but I think that I lost a couple pounds of boost, however it could just be the weather today. Also I broke the tank so I cant put it back to the way it was. Damn temper.
Old 10-08-2009, 02:16 PM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
Zander916's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-08
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cmiller8006
I tried this but I think that I lost a couple pounds of boost, however it could just be the weather today. Also I broke the tank so I cant put it back to the way it was. Damn temper.
Oops! Yeah I bet it might be the weather. It's cold and rainy here.

EDIT: CRAPPY VID BUT HOPEFULLY IT WILL HELP!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GrBO7LcvPg
Old 10-08-2009, 02:20 PM
  #81  
Senior Member
 
Stamina's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-09-09
Location: Tejas
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by cmiller8006
I tried this but I think that I lost a couple pounds of boost, however it could just be the weather today. Also I broke the tank so I cant put it back to the way it was. Damn temper.
Originally Posted by Zander916
Oops! Yeah I bet it might be the weather. It's cold and rainy here.
^qft

Cold=less boost
Old 10-08-2009, 02:42 PM
  #82  
Senior Member
 
Zander916's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-08
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Stamina
Why go through the trouble of taking it off?... It doesn't weigh a thing. If the hoses bother you, just disconnect them.
True... Some people might so I did. If not for requests I'd probably have just left it. Although I would have taken off the hoses. It irritates me to see loose dangling hoses.
Old 10-08-2009, 03:06 PM
  #83  
Senior Member
 
Stamina's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-09-09
Location: Tejas
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Zander916
True... Some people might so I did. If not for requests I'd probably have just left it. Although I would have taken off the hoses. It irritates me to see loose dangling hoses.
Yeah, I really don't like loose things in the engine compartment, so I completely feel ya on that one.
Old 10-08-2009, 04:15 PM
  #84  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
fakameanrepresent's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-21-09
Location: hawaii
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zander916
True... Some people might so I did. If not for requests I'd probably have just left it. Although I would have taken off the hoses. It irritates me to see loose dangling hoses.
thanks a lot for the how to. now i will be doing this this weekend along with the infamous leak on my LNF motor. just got my S/C tune today, the car is so much faster now.
Old 10-08-2009, 08:43 PM
  #85  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Black08SSTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-10-08
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 5,678
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
yea lol i forgot to look at this when i got outta work this morning at 7am. Im off tomorrow at 7am again but dont have to be in. Will be checking or doing this in the AM
Old 10-09-2009, 12:04 AM
  #86  
Senior Member
 
berto's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-30-07
Location: Bakersfiled,CA
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zander916
I guess I forgot to mention the throttle body. If you let off the gas while under boost it will close. Then you have pressure in the intake tract, but vacuum in the intake manifold. So at the BPV then has pressure on one side of it's diaphragm and vacuum on the other cause the line is fed from the manifold and it opens to relieve pressure. The solenoid is just doing this electronically.
If you look at the diagram, the intake line connected to the solenoid would be under pressure. The intake manifold line would be under vacuum (if the throttle is suddenly closed). The solenoid is just the ECU determining when this happens rather than just physics. I didn't bypass the Solenoid although the Solstice guys did. I just bypassed the tank (which they didn't have in the first place unless the later models do)



I noticed you have an HKS BOV and Hahn block off plate. Yours might already be bypassed. Can you take a pic of yours and post it up?
I don't really recommend bypassing the solenoid like the Solstice guys did. (The pic with the 'T' connection) As someone told me, "it might save your bacon if something goes wrong."

Alright... hahaha.. I'm diagram happy and I suck at it! Here's another. This shows what I think the solenoid is doing. I could be wrong but I don't know what else it would be doing. It's just switching between positive and negative pressure to control the BPV.

I'm one line away from making a couple Swastikas!
ok ill try to get a pic up so someone can help....what would explai my low boost though??
Old 10-09-2009, 08:10 AM
  #87  
Member
 
BIGTAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-04-08
Location: Ashburn, Virginia
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i didnt this yesterday. i didnt notice anything huge but im deffinetly spiking 24lbs and holding 21-22lbs where before i was only holding 20lbs third also feels a little bit better too
Old 10-09-2009, 10:08 AM
  #88  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by rukkee
For anyone thats confused ........THis is exactly what your trying to accomplish

That picture is worth two thousand words. Thank you sir. I am going to do this mod to my car tonight maybe it will reduce lag between shifts.
Old 10-09-2009, 11:58 AM
  #89  
Senior Member
 
DillySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-20-09
Location: Naperville
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We need a good name for this mod so we don't lose face infront of other car geeks, instead of calling it a "bypass valve boost vacuum tube delete mod" which sounds like we have no idea what we are doing.

I suggest "Loop-back mod"
Old 10-09-2009, 12:22 PM
  #90  
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
rukkee's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-21-06
Location: Western NY
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
That picture is worth two thousand words. Thank you sir. I am going to do this mod to my car tonight maybe it will reduce lag between shifts.
NP , I did it a couple of days ago and haven't driven the car yet so i really don't know what it will be like. I'll PM you later about another matter ...... I haven't had access to my friends HP Tuner's yet so I've been in a holding pattern.

Originally Posted by DillySS
We need a good name for this mod so we don't lose face infront of other car geeks, instead of calling it a "bypass valve boost vacuum tube delete mod" which sounds like we have no idea what we are doing.

I suggest "Loop-back mod"
It's basically a Vacuum tank bypass.
Old 10-09-2009, 12:32 PM
  #91  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
cmiller8006's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-29-08
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Stamina
^qft

Cold=less boost
Not when tuned.
Old 10-09-2009, 12:46 PM
  #92  
Senior Member
 
purplehaze03's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
someone needs to put vids up of the sound difference/ reaction time difference

and how will this react with the dejon spring and a tune?

Last edited by purplehaze03; 10-09-2009 at 12:46 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 10-09-2009, 02:34 PM
  #93  
Senior Member
 
Zander916's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-08
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BIGTAG
i didnt this yesterday. i didnt notice anything huge but im deffinetly spiking 24lbs and holding 21-22lbs where before i was only holding 20lbs third also feels a little bit better too
Yeah that's kind of what I thought I was seeing. It spiked and then settled just a bit higher than it did before.
I took a mini-trip yesterday. Drove about 4 hours. To me it seems like it has more power down low at part throttle (ie - 2K rpm) and the power is smooth.
Old 10-09-2009, 02:39 PM
  #94  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Zander916
Yeah that's kind of what I thought I was seeing. It spiked and then settled just a bit higher than it did before.
I took a mini-trip yesterday. Drove about 4 hours. To me it seems like it has more power down low at part throttle (ie - 2K rpm) and the power is smooth.
I always wondered where that line went under the intake.
I did this to my car an hour ago but I have not driven it yet. If it works great I am going to permently remove the Vacuum cannister. Why did GM put it there in the first place on our version of the LNF? Were is Bill the engineer when we need him?
Old 10-09-2009, 02:46 PM
  #95  
Senior Member
 
pookie025's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-10-09
Location: east hartford, connecticut
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i did this and the check engine did not go away p2261. do i have to take off the tank completely, or do i need to put the stock bpv spring back in because i have the dejon spring and i am running a hks and it makes weird noises. after i change the hoses around the car did run better!!
Old 10-09-2009, 02:48 PM
  #96  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by pookie025
i did this and the check engine did not go away p2261. do i have to take off the tank completely, or do i need to put the stock bpv spring back in because i have the dejon spring and i am running a hks and it makes weird noises. after i change the hoses around the car did run better!!
Maybe the hoes are not hooked up correctly? You should have no codes form bypassing the vacuum tank.
Old 10-09-2009, 02:55 PM
  #97  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
umrdyldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-06-06
Location: MO
Posts: 11,666
Received 65 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by pookie025
i did this and the check engine did not go away p2261. do i have to take off the tank completely, or do i need to put the stock bpv spring back in because i have the dejon spring and i am running a hks and it makes weird noises. after i change the hoses around the car did run better!!
I"m gonna say it's the spring

Do we really need to shorten the hose? Or just take one end off the tank and just use the existing longer hose?

Or would it be better to get new hose at O'Reilly or Autozone?

Last edited by umrdyldo; 10-09-2009 at 02:55 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 10-09-2009, 03:40 PM
  #98  
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
rukkee's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-21-06
Location: Western NY
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just used a 6 inch piece of 7/16th's and was done in less than 5 minutes . If you want to use one of the hoses off the tank it shouldn't make too much of a difference.

Last edited by rukkee; 10-10-2009 at 02:36 PM.
Old 10-09-2009, 04:06 PM
  #99  
Senior Member
 
MaxVQ35DE's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-17-08
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds like were not smarter than the engineers.
Old 10-09-2009, 04:18 PM
  #100  
Senior Member
 
Zander916's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-05-08
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Terminator2
I always wondered where that line went under the intake.
I did this to my car an hour ago but I have not driven it yet. If it works great I am going to permently remove the Vacuum cannister. Why did GM put it there in the first place on our version of the LNF? Were is Bill the engineer when we need him?
The ONLY thing that makes sense to me is maybe to provide a SLIGHT delay in the BPV opening for the NLS feature. That's probably part of the system that gives us a split second to nail the NLS. After removal it might be even MORE critical to nail that NLS. That's my theory. If it's correct I'm not too worried. I don't NLS much at all. I did once since this mod and nailed it anyway.

Originally Posted by umrdyldo
I"m gonna say it's the spring

Do we really need to shorten the hose? Or just take one end off the tank and just use the existing longer hose?

Or would it be better to get new hose at O'Reilly or Autozone?
I don't think it would make much difference which way you went. Having said that if you REALLY want to get critical then shorter would be better since it's volume of air that we're eliminating by bypassing the tank.

I think the EASIEST way would be to just buy a small chunk of hose. It'll be extremely easy to reverse the mod that way too.

Originally Posted by pookie025
i did this and the check engine did not go away p2261. do i have to take off the tank completely, or do i need to put the stock bpv spring back in because i have the dejon spring and i am running a hks and it makes weird noises. after i change the hoses around the car did run better!!
Hmm... P2261. BPV stuck closed? That's the code right?

You have a lot of aftermarket stuff. I'm guessing either something is not connected correctly or you have a vacuum leak and it's not pulling enough vacuum to open the BPV.

You should get a pic up so we can have a look.

EDIT: on second though I'm with umrdyldo. I had the spring for a while and it didn't cause problems but I had everything else stock. I'd put the stock spring in like umrdyldo said and see if that takes care of it.

Last edited by Zander916; 10-09-2009 at 04:22 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost


Quick Reply: Bypass Valve fix/Possible Boost Mod



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 PM.