2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Bypass Valve fix/Possible Boost Mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #151  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by Gimpster
Maybe I'll get out the car tonight and do a before/after 3rd pull and post the logs. Although getting the cover off/on is a PITA blah.
I know i'm not looking forward to putting my car in the garage for the winter. She has a nice "sleeping bag" (cover) so she should be content.

I, on the other hand ....will be rocking a 98 sunfire AUTO lol......It's an Ebrake slidding machine. It's kinda fun driving a car you don't care about at all ... no door ding or pothole stress.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 06:01 PM
  #152  
Gimpster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-09
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 2
From: Des Moines, IA
Hey, it could be worse.... I rocked this HOT purple SunBIRD one Winter. $200 bucks and a lot of motor honey later we got to spring again



It did snow here last weekend, but thankfully they didn't feel the need to spray brine everywhere. Otherwise I wouldnt even drag it out of the garage one last time.

---

EDIT

So.. .what am I logging here tonight?

Stock
With tank removed
With solenoid AND tank removed

?

Last edited by Gimpster; Oct 13, 2009 at 06:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 07:49 PM
  #153  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
all you should be testing is stock, and with this bypass mod. Don't care about the tank itself. You don't remove the selenoid.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #154  
Gimpster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-09
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 2
From: Des Moines, IA
OKAY, I tested stock, without tank only and then solenoid totally removed from system just now. You guys are lucky I like you, because it started to sprinkle as I did the second test. I spent like 12 hours washing over, under and waxxing the car 3wks ago

I'll wait until I get them side-by-side in Excel, but at this moment I can tell you there were no gains in boost @ upper rpm ranges. Not sure about boost recovery between shifts until I get the data in there.

Gimme a lil bit.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #155  
HHRSSouth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-04-09
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
People thought this was a mod for more boost?
The mod does exactly what I thought it would do, faster spool up, steady peak boost in all gears, with less drop off in shifts.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:02 PM
  #156  
Gimpster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-09
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 2
From: Des Moines, IA
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/show...87#post4376287

There are the testing results, I figured it deserved a new not 9 page thread.

HHRSSouth, some people claimed to see more boost... which I knew wouldnt be the case and the data confirms that to me. Unless the PCM was commanding the BPV to crack open up top, there was no way.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:04 PM
  #157  
HHRSSouth's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-04-09
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Yeah saw the post after I had posted one here already.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:20 PM
  #158  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by Gimpster
Hey, it could be worse.... I rocked this HOT purple SunBIRD one Winter. $200 bucks and a lot of motor honey later we got to spring again


It did snow here last weekend, but thankfully they didn't feel the need to spray brine everywhere. Otherwise I wouldnt even drag it out of the garage one last time.

---

EDIT

So.. .what am I logging here tonight?

Stock
With tank removed
With solenoid AND tank removed

?
Nice sun-chicken hehe.... 93-94? Those 3.1's last quite well , and a GT in that model is kinda rare. I had a 90 and 91 that i used for beaters , the 90 was a 2.0L and the 91 was a 3.1L .... the 3.1 back in it's day was pretty quick for what was out there at the time ...heheh.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:21 PM
  #159  
ColeJJones's Avatar
Bannned
 
Joined: 09-08-07
Posts: 8,743
Likes: 0
From: Kaneohe, HI
hey when you go to write your tune to your car from hp tuners how are you supposed to do that? i read only flash calibrations or something like that
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:46 PM
  #160  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by ColeJJones
hey when you go to write your tune to your car from hp tuners how are you supposed to do that? i read only flash calibrations or something like that
Joined the dark side it see lol. I remember when I traded my SC i had buyer's remorse cause i missed the SC whine and instant throttle response. That lasted till i got the S.chips tune. Good luck with the new ride/
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:57 PM
  #161  
Gimpster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-09
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 2
From: Des Moines, IA
You just hit the write calibration button on the toolbar in VCM Editor.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #162  
SeanEE89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-09-09
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Manassas, VA
subscribed
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 09:59 PM
  #163  
badbaltguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-20-08
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: El Paso Texas
hhhmmmmmzzzz
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 11:44 PM
  #164  
cobalt9123's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-22-07
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: Winder, GA
sub'd.....might try it
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 03:17 AM
  #165  
SSlobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-09
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 7
From: Kathmandu
Holy thread-resurrection, Batman.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2010 | 11:00 PM
  #166  
DoMiStIc_RuSh_06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 4,105
Likes: 0
From: New Minas, Nova Scotia, Canada
Well I triedthis last night an my car felt a little slower response wise. It took longer to build boost as well. But I am having issues with boost flutter when I'm in vacuum below 0psi, so would this conclude that I have a vacuum leak somewhere?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2010 | 10:09 AM
  #167  
ctn2mb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 05-31-09
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by DoMiStIc_RuSh_06
Well I triedthis last night an my car felt a little slower response wise. It took longer to build boost as well. But I am having issues with boost flutter when I'm in vacuum below 0psi, so would this conclude that I have a vacuum leak somewhere?
well I've had it done for awhile now, I don't have any boost flutter below 0 psi... my bpv is more responsive... still waiting to get my data-log back from Vince to see if any performance was lost.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 04:19 PM
  #168  
boosted10cobalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-24-11
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: hanceville al
Originally Posted by Zander916
Yep, that's a definite. I admit, I could just be dreaming about the 1 psi... looked like it. But I don't stare at the boost gauge all that much.
im still not understanding this lol.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 04:25 PM
  #169  
boosted10cobalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-24-11
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: hanceville al
so u just leave the plugs un plug? or what lol
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 06:18 PM
  #170  
SSlobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-09
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 7
From: Kathmandu
Resurrected again!!
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 06:53 AM
  #171  
iboost's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 12-22-08
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, New York
sub'd
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 01:36 PM
  #172  
silverbullet08's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-12-08
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by boosted10cobalt
so u just leave the plugs un plug? or what lol

No. You are bypasing the vacume tank. If you actually trace the three vacume lines that are on the front of the motor you will see exactly how its done. I believe there are pictures in the thread aswell. And no you dont see more boost. if you have a vacume leak then your Bypass valve will crack open and you could lose a little boost up top. It will make your valve response go up slightly since your getting rid of extra line and a box that has to be filled first.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2011 | 01:33 PM
  #173  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by silverbullet08
This should be a sticky if we can make it, After about an hour of trouble shooting and test runs i have found out why my car would only boost to about 10 psi, sometimes 14psi, and other times only 5psi. Its another one of GM's contraptions that hasnt worked for me. I have heard others talking about this so i did some research and turned some bolts and this is what i found. THIS MAY ACTUALLY BE A BOOST MOD. I am boosting 18psi now that i have done this. Im not sure what the factory boost setting is so correct me if im wrong.

HOW IT WORKS:
The LNF has a recirculating bypass valve/Blow off valve located on the passanger side of the turbo. It is held on by three 10mm bolts and a vacum line in the middle of the plate. When throttle is released vacume travels throught the lines pulling back on the valve and releasing it backwards through your air intake/air filter after the MAF sensor.

THE PROBLEM:
On a scanner or code reader, you will see a turbo/supercharger bypass mechanicle code. You may get random codes about unexplained air/fuel misreading. Your car will boost to the propper level sometimes but not always, seeing a varitation of boost levels between 0-10psi.

WHAT CAUSES IT:
There are three actual problems that can occure, a leaking vacume line, actual bypass valve stuck in the turbo, or the GM engineered vacume tank may be leaking or have a bad check valve inside. The tank is there to help build and store vacume to help with "faster spool times" and make it more "responsive". IMO it does nothing but get in the way and cause problems. I felt like it spooled faster and was more responsive after i removed it.

THE FIX:
If it is your vacume tank you can easily bypass it in about 3 mins. There are three vacume lines coming up the front of the motor by the dipstick. One from your MAP sensor and other two from your vacume tank. First remove the Vacume line that comes up and goes into the top of the intake manifold then remove the vacume line closest to the dipstick on the bypass solinoid "where they all meet". cut about 5"-6" of vacume line off one of the lines you removed and plug it into the manifold and where you just disconnected it from the solenoid. Go for a drive and see if it solves it. If so then you can reach the vacume tank from the underside of the car to remove it "one bolt".

After doing this my car felt 10x more responsive, and boosts to 18psi consistantly. IDK what the actual factory boost setting is but it feels alot faster than what it felt at 15psi. And of course you should see a little more power with a little more boost but it made a pretty good difference for me.
Any updates on this mod? It essentially bypasses the lower vaccum tank.
I'm always leary when you try to *outsmart* the engineers. This tank stores vacuum *on tap* for quick BPV release when needed to prevent turbo surge. There are a TON of posts here...back and forth but nothing here convinces me. Anyone here with it NOW? Feed back appreciated.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 03:50 PM
  #174  
FRQ FLYR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-22-09
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
My impressions: Slightly more responsive/quicker spool with mod in place; my main concern is what you indicated regarding "in boost" conditions. Mod was in use at the track.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2011 | 03:05 PM
  #175  
FF_ace's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-06
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Sub
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.