2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Did a pull in the cobalt.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 02:50 PM
  #1  
cmiller8006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-29-08
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Did a pull in the cobalt.

Here is a video. The speedo lags more than I thought. 3.72 seconds 60-100 and 6.8 seconds 60-120, with the car spinning at 90 because I was cresting a little hill. Car can still be faster.

YouTube - 2009 Cobalt SS 60-120.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 02:57 PM
  #2  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
sub'd for after work
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #3  
08ssedan's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-03-09
Posts: 5,108
Likes: 0
From: North Phoenix
hoe-lee-****.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #4  
MP Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-02-07
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 0
From: MP, PA (S of Pittsburgh)
dude i want that in my car. so smooth damn
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #5  
stoon_cobalt_colby's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
holy ****!
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #6  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Pulls smooth. I am suprised it is not more violent honestly. What pressure level are you runnning right now? How much air is that turbo moving currently?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #7  
AndrewSS/TC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-05-10
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Wow. Do want.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #8  
BlackJackSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-09-09
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: Grain Valley, MO
thats pretty quick. damn turbo cars pull so hard over 100 still.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #9  
rico's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-09-07
Posts: 8,962
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
nice gave me an idea to to this with my teg at 10 psi and see how i do lol
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #10  
donkeyballs's Avatar
Platinum Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-08-10
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 1
From: buffalo
Dam that was smooth.. These speedometers suck it still climbs when you first hit the brakes after a hard take off. I could imagine how bad it is in your car.Lol
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #11  
ricky3000gt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-31-08
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Try to get a video from the outside of the car or have a friend do it... this **** looks fast.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #12  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
24psi. I forget what the peak MAF lbs was honestly. I can check tho.

Checked: 42 MAF Lbs, not just a peak, holds pretty flat from 5500 up. VE is over 35 almost all of the pull, peaks close to 38!! lol. VE line looks like a s/c power line on a dyno lol.

Last edited by BYT*SS*TURBO; Nov 4, 2010 at 03:31 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:42 PM
  #13  
skip_jones's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-12-09
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 0
From: milan, ohio
weak.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:46 PM
  #14  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
^It's Muff Cabbage :p
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #15  
383_Stroker's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 02-25-08
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Murray, KY
slow man.. slow.. .. thats only like.. 1.7seconds faster than my best ever 60-100
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:55 PM
  #16  
cmiller8006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-29-08
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by ricky3000gt
Try to get a video from the outside of the car or have a friend do it... this **** looks fast.
Getting go pro for the track next year. Am going to suction it to the back side window.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:57 PM
  #17  
cmiller8006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-29-08
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by skip_jones
weak.
You
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 03:59 PM
  #18  
cmiller8006's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-29-08
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Also I got the accurate pull times because I was logging with hp tuners if anyone was wondering.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #19  
Perfect.disguise's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
Subd for later.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 04:04 PM
  #20  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
Originally Posted by cmiller8006
Also I got the accurate pull times because I was logging with hp tuners if anyone was wondering.
Speak!!!
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 04:13 PM
  #21  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by cmiller8006
Here is a video. The speedo lags more than I thought. 3.72 seconds 60-100 and 6.8 seconds 60-120, with the car spinning at 90 because I was cresting a little hill. Car can still be faster.
Damn that ***** is FAASST..with a 60-100 under 4 you're lookin at around 400WHP for sure.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #22  
ULWizSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-30-10
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Florence, NJ
Please post your address so we can come steal your car and take it for a joy ride.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #23  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
Damn that moves out man!
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #24  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by cmiller8006
Also I got the accurate pull times because I was logging with hp tuners if anyone was wondering.
Yeah..I use a stop watch and wanted to know how accurate that was compared to a logged run. I got around 4.1 sec. I guess these speedos do run slower. I was told the same thing by *I am Broke* a well.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #25  
tglems's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-01-09
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Wow....that is just sickness. I got bored and looked this up...
60-100mph times:

Bugatti Veyron 3.0s
Pagani Zonda F 3.1s
McLaren F1 3.1s
Ferrari Enzo 3.2s
Brabus Bullit 3.2s
Porsche Carrera GT 3.2s
Ruf CTR Yellow Bird 3.2s
Pagani Zonda Roadster 3.3s
Aston Martin V12 Vantage RS 3.5s
Dodge Viper SRT10 ACR 3.5s
Bugatti EB110 SuperSport 3.6s
Ferrari 288GTO 3.6s
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 3.6s
Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 3.7s
Chevrolet Corvette Callaway C16 3.7s
Mercedes-Benz McLaren SLR Stirling Moss 3.7s
Pagani Zonda C12 S 7.3 3.7s
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren 3.8s
Saleen S7 3.8s
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren 722 Edition 3.8s
Porsche 911 997 GT2 3.9s
Ferrari 430 Scuderia 3.9s
Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 3.9s
Melling Wildcat 4.1s
Ferrari F40 4.1s
Wiesmann GT MF5 4.1s
Caterham 7 Superlight R500 4.1s
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster 4.2s
Lamborghini Reventon 4.2s
Chevrolet Corvette Z06 4.2s
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.