2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Dual Boost Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2013 | 07:26 AM
  #26  
Aleksey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-15-11
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
From: Poconos, PA
Great innovation, the only downfall is now there will be more crappy 1.2 1.4 1.6 liter turbo cars on the market that put down less than 200/200 hp/tq :-(
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2013 | 05:06 PM
  #27  
FasterIsBetter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 2
From: South Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
merge into one intake? That way one MAF sensor? At least for us cobalts. lol. Or tune by MAP. Buying two K&N intakes would be too much of a hassle.
Blow through maf....already done.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2013 | 06:47 PM
  #28  
Frogstofall's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-30-11
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by FasterIsBetter
Blow through maf....already done.
I don't think any car company would be stupid enough to do a blow through setup. I could be wrong but I highly doubt they would take the risk.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2013 | 09:15 PM
  #29  
FasterIsBetter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 2
From: South Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by Frogstofall
I don't think any car company would be stupid enough to do a blow through setup. I could be wrong but I highly doubt they would take the risk.
Oh, I thought he was talking about using one on a cobalt. He said 2 K&N SRIs with 2 mafs and it confused me. And I don't see any risk. There isn't any if they design the charge tube properly. But still yet it could be even ran as previously said as an intake that split with the maf before the split.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2013 | 09:19 PM
  #30  
AaronJ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-07-10
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 2
From: Oshkosh, WI
Originally Posted by Aleksey
Great innovation, the only downfall is now there will be more crappy 1.2 1.4 1.6 liter turbo cars on the market that put down less than 200/200 hp/tq :-(
Idk what you're talking about. You'd rather have our current 2.2L and 2.4L N/A cars that put down less than 200/200 hp/tq instead of a 1.2L, 1.4L, or 1.6L turbo putting down that same power? Smaller engine, better fuel efficiency, with the same power numbers somehow equals a bad thing?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2013 | 10:28 PM
  #31  
Frogstofall's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-30-11
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by FasterIsBetter
Oh, I thought he was talking about using one on a cobalt. He said 2 K&N SRIs with 2 mafs and it confused me. And I don't see any risk. There isn't any if they design the charge tube properly. But still yet it could be even ran as previously said as an intake that split with the maf before the split.
The risk that always circulates in my mind with blow through is getting blow by and/or moisture on the MAF.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
Dec 11, 2022 04:47 PM
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.