2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

E85 lnf

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 04:31 PM
  #51  
colodude18's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-12-10
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 171
From: Greater Denver Area, Colorado
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
I would put one of my e47 K04 cars up against a ZFR on 91. It would be a close race for both cars.
No.
I made 359 on K04 on E85 and 479 on e47 on the ZFR.
ZFR on 91 will make well over 400.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 08:43 PM
  #52  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,896
Likes: 96
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
No, he's actually around 6 ms around 6300 rpm and no fuel pressure drop. And that's moving 33.5lb of airflow.

The tune isn't easy to accomplish on full e85, and there's really no power difference over e47. So stick with e47 in my opinion. There aren't that many LNF tuners out there with as much experience as me, and it was a chore to tune SlowbaltSS's car on full e85 with stock injectors.
What AFR do you run the car at? I totally agree that with the lobe you'll have enough fuel up top that is no issue but on spool i bet its out of control! And the MAF airflow you stated is really low but i know that's not a good comparison point because injector constant and how much fuel is pulled from the MAF comes into play

Last edited by KMO43; Feb 11, 2016 at 08:53 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2016 | 09:51 AM
  #53  
CudaJoe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-21-09
Posts: 11,280
Likes: 74
From: Newark, DE
Originally Posted by colodude18
No.
I made 359 on K04 on E85 and 479 on e47 on the ZFR.
ZFR on 91 will make well over 400.
I was thinking the same thing. ZFR should definately still make some power on 91 octane. but im not a tuner so Im like everyone else scratching their heads here.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2016 | 10:23 AM
  #54  
Canadia's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-07-12
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 13
From: Dartmouth
Originally Posted by KMO43
Sorry but no

Didn't say it was faster only said the results were similar because 91 is so ****
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2016 | 12:02 PM
  #55  
Psykostevo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-06
Posts: 6,910
Likes: 6
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by KMO43
What AFR do you run the car at? I totally agree that with the lobe you'll have enough fuel up top that is no issue but on spool i bet its out of control! And the MAF airflow you stated is really low but i know that's not a good comparison point because injector constant and how much fuel is pulled from the MAF comes into play
I have him running a target lambda of 0.88 to 0.89 which would be a gas equivalent AFR of 12.9 - 13.0. Since he is on e85 the real AFR is quite different, but I find it easier to talk to most people about LNF AFRs in terms of Lambda because it's more of an apples to apples language.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2016 | 04:16 PM
  #56  
KMO43's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-21-12
Posts: 6,896
Likes: 96
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by Psykostevo
I have him running a target lambda of 0.88 to 0.89 which would be a gas equivalent AFR of 12.9 - 13.0. Since he is on e85 the real AFR is quite different, but I find it easier to talk to most people about LNF AFRs in terms of Lambda because it's more of an apples to apples language.
Yes i know about lambda and AFR. what is the inj ms on spool?? I know you'll have enough fuel up top on the k04 tunning full E it doesn't flow enough
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Staged07SS
ZZ Performance
22
Dec 9, 2015 07:48 AM
Aroooo
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
1
Dec 2, 2015 12:22 AM
firehawk618
Drivetrain
0
Nov 27, 2015 12:19 AM
dennis69
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
16
Nov 10, 2015 02:38 PM
Tykuura
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
Nov 3, 2015 03:24 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 PM.