2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

GM Powertrain Website posts LNF INFO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #1  
billwit's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 11-22-07
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: ohio
GM Powertrain Website posts LNF INFO

All this is now public info.
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...2008/08car.htm

Engine power curve:
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...obalt%20SS.pdf

Engine Spec Sheet:
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...tec/08_LNF.xls

Engine Information:
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...tec/08_LNF.doc

Trans Spec Sheet:
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...08_GME_MU3.xls

Transmission Info:
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...ion/08_MU3.doc
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2007 | 11:51 AM
  #2  
Fast_Focus's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-07-07
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Burleson, TX
the torque curve on that motor is sexy!!!
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 12:51 AM
  #3  
firebalt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-25-07
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: AHIL
DAMN! torque right off the bat
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 12:55 AM
  #4  
Super_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
From: N. Side Chi-Town
so comparin s2 graph vs ss/tc graph,seems like the ss/sc is better...turbo hits full power at almost redline,where the ss/sc hits it around 4500
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #5  
KillerBee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-23-07
Posts: 14,118
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Awsome info this needs to be made a STICKY mods sticky please
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #6  
Magill8's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-25-07
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Po-town Ny
Originally Posted by Super_SS
so comparin s2 graph vs ss/tc graph,seems like the ss/sc is better...turbo hits full power at almost redline,where the ss/sc hits it around 4500
True
But the TC is making the same power @ 4500rpm as the SC is. So basically the SC is @ max power, while the TC is just getting stronger and stronger higher up the RPM's
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #7  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by Magill8
True
But the TC is making the same power @ 4500rpm as the SC is. So basically the SC is @ max power, while the TC is just getting stronger and stronger higher up the RPM's
Uh-oh... someone didn't take into account drive train losses and under ratings....
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 02:50 AM
  #8  
SportredSS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-08
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Phx. Az
A supercharged engine creates more drivetrain loss. It also creates parasitic drag on the engine as it's belt driven and the unit is 50% heavier than a small turbo.. A turbo will always be a better choice, for power, efficiency, economy, you name it. There's a reason sooooo! many 2003-2004 cobra owners are swapping out their superchargers for a turbo or two. I had a SS\SC, did a power adder swap to a turbo and the car woke up big time. And when the SS\SC peaks out in its power band the SS\T just carries on up the rpm band with more power and way!!! more torque.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 04:01 AM
  #9  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by SportredSS
A supercharged engine creates more drivetrain loss. It also creates parasitic drag on the engine as it's belt driven and the unit is 50% heavier than a small turbo.. A turbo will always be a better choice, for power, efficiency, economy, you name it. There's a reason sooooo! many 2003-2004 cobra owners are swapping out their superchargers for a turbo or two. I had a SS\SC, did a power adder swap to a turbo and the car woke up big time. And when the SS\SC peaks out in its power band the SS\T just carries on up the rpm band with more power and way!!! more torque.
.... um... ok....
You should use the search button before posting that kind of stuff.
It's been beaten to death a million times, and I don't think anyone wants to see this thread go that was.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #10  
M1kl0's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-15-08
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx
Originally Posted by Omega_5
.... um... ok....
You should use the search button before posting that kind of stuff.
It's been beaten to death a million times, and I don't think anyone wants to see this thread go that was.
ya, beat too damn much. its alreaty ready for roasting cause its tender.


but truth be told, the cobalt ss shouldve been the lnf in the first place, just my 2 cents though.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 01:37 PM
  #11  
SSpdDmon's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Farmington, MI
Owner's Manuals:

2008
http://content.gmownercenter.yahoo.c...alt_owners.pdf

2009
http://content.gmownercenter.yahoo.c...alt_owners.pdf
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 01:55 PM
  #12  
xray_racer's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-18-08
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Do the hp and torque curves seem odd to anybody else? I haven't seen that many, but the ones I have seen are not nearly that straight-lined. If it wasn't something "official" I might be calling bs.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #13  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by SportredSS
A supercharged engine creates more drivetrain loss. It also creates parasitic drag on the engine as it's belt driven and the unit is 50% heavier than a small turbo.. A turbo will always be a better choice, for power, efficiency, economy, you name it. There's a reason sooooo! many 2003-2004 cobra owners are swapping out their superchargers for a turbo or two. I had a SS\SC, did a power adder swap to a turbo and the car woke up big time. And when the SS\SC peaks out in its power band the SS\T just carries on up the rpm band with more power and way!!! more torque.
the ss/sc carries its power well all the way to 7000 grand .... most ss/sc make peak hp at 6500 rpm. a ss/tc's power starts to fall off right around 5500 rpm or so .... your statement is false. Yes the ss/tc makes more hp & tq stock, but a ss/sc is no slug and most deff. has a great power curve.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 02:29 PM
  #14  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
not to be a dick.. but ... repost

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/general-cobalt-68/info-all-balts-engine-internals-tranny-118908/

it just has the engine info on there but it has a link to where you can find the rest of the stuff

Last edited by elecblue06; Mar 20, 2009 at 02:29 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 02:34 PM
  #15  
MachiBLue's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-20-05
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by elecblue06
not to be a dick.. but ... repost

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=118908

it just has the engine info on there but it has a link to where you can find the rest of the stuff
check again. OP posts is from 2007, link you gave is from 2008
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #16  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by MachiBLue
check again. OP posts is from 2007, link you gave is from 2008
ahhh i see

however my link is stickied lol .. didnt realize this was just a bumped up old thread
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 03:31 PM
  #17  
afireinside7710's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-06
Posts: 7,641
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Zombie Thread, Run!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #18  
Fastgear01's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-05-09
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Long Island, NY
the torque stays from 1800 or so to almost 6000 thats awesome I love that.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #19  
metroplex's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-11-09
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 2
From: Detroit, MI
The crossover point should be at 5250 RPM, I think the scaling on the chart for the torque causes the curve to be skewed a little.

I like that torque "curve", it's almost like a diesel.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 02:14 AM
  #20  
SS/TCCobalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-20-09
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Morrison, Co
New member and owner of a SS/TC sedan, some of the links dont work for my computer, was wondering if any1 can help out with specs on the lnf and even more info on the turbo? It sounds stupid to ask but is it even necessary to idel the engine before shut down to prevent turbo damge? I work on semi's for a living and on the heavy duty side we dont need to worry about that crap?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #21  
SS/TCCobalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-20-09
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Morrison, Co
Is this site dead or something?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #22  
tomj77's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-14-08
Posts: 12,039
Likes: 156
From: canada
no u dont have to let it idel before shutdown. since u usually drive nice the last minute or so when u come to where ur going, and also it is water and oil cooled so there isn't any need unless u drive the **** out of it or are at the track then let it idel for a little before shut down to be safe.
turbo is ko4 twinscroll. thats all i know
Reply
Old May 17, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #23  
PimpLay2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh to D.C.
am i the only one who still looks at our LNF specs?
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 03:11 AM
  #24  
spectre0618's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-18-09
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
Canada

Originally Posted by Omega_5
Uh-oh... someone didn't take into account drive train losses and under ratings....


Jeeze people. Who cares who has what. The critics, magazines and people with way more knowledge than most of us have praised the LNF powered Cobalt as being far ahead of the old Supercharged. Lets stop arguing about it. Drive train loss, underrated that....Why can't people just accept progression. The SS was near the bottom of it's class as a Supercharged vehicle, now it virtually leads it's class. END OF STORY!!! lol
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 03:15 AM
  #25  
berto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-07
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfiled,CA
nice
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 AM.