2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

LNF Sludge

Old Mar 11, 2011 | 08:03 AM
  #1  
neverone99's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 03-11-11
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
LNF Sludge

I am looking at buying a SS/TC but I have a question...is it susceptible to Direct Injection sludge like most other DI engines? I have read one place that said the LNF doesn't have EGR so if this is the case then it shouldn't sludge up at all.

Has anyone experienced valve/intake runner sludge with the LNF?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 08:13 AM
  #2  
nickadolph's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-29-08
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Regular seafoaming should take care of any build up.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 08:25 AM
  #3  
Grishbok's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-10
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: VA
its a side-affect of direct injection. its not nescessarily as bad as if egr was implimented, but its kind of the nature of the beast.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 08:47 AM
  #4  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Carbon buildup on the intake valve stems. Seafoam helps some.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 08:58 AM
  #5  
Gunney_07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 02-24-08
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: NY
so does meth injection =)
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 10:14 AM
  #6  
northvibe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-07-06
Posts: 14,121
Likes: 11
From: Minnesota
yes it will sludge some but why do people think seafoaming is so great?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 11:44 AM
  #7  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Originally Posted by northvibe
yes it will sludge some but why do people think seafoaming is so great?
Never said it's great, it helps some. Nothing but a toothbrush and time will get the carbon off the valve stems. At 50k miles I had about 1/8" built up around the stems that some Kroil and brushing took off. I seafoamed it twice before that at 20k & 40k. It helps soften & cut some of the carbon when you let it get drawn slowly into the intake manifold.

Meth injection right after the IC would do a better job. Maybe this summer...lol.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 11:44 AM
  #8  
nickadolph's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-29-08
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
because it works
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 11:46 AM
  #9  
northvibe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-07-06
Posts: 14,121
Likes: 11
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Iam Broke
Never said it's great, it helps some. Nothing but a toothbrush and time will get the carbon off the valve stems. At 50k miles I had about 1/8" built up around the stems that some Kroil and brushing took off. I seafoamed it twice before that at 20k & 40k. It helps soften & cut some of the carbon when you let it get drawn slowly into the intake manifold.

Meth injection right after the IC would do a better job. Maybe this summer...lol.
someone should prove that seafoam actually does help because I'm still skeptical.

Originally Posted by nickadolph
because it works
and you know this how?

Last edited by northvibe; Mar 11, 2011 at 11:46 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 11:57 AM
  #10  
Grishbok's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-10
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: VA
not another seafoam discussion... there is no hard evidence that this stuff works and is generally recomended as a last ditch effort to free a valve that is stuck due to carbon buildup.

The recent additives in shell "V power" do a pretty good job at keeping residue buildup to a minimum.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 11:59 AM
  #11  
northvibe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-07-06
Posts: 14,121
Likes: 11
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Grishbok
not another seafoam discussion... there is no hard evidence that this stuff works and is generally recomended as a last ditch effort to free a valve that is stuck due to carbon buildup.

The recent additives in shell "V power" do a pretty good job at keeping residue buildup to a minimum.
exactly
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 12:03 PM
  #12  
gmtech16450yz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by northvibe
someone should prove that seafoam actually does help because I'm still skeptical.



and you know this how?

Cleaning the valves, pistons and chambers with some sort of top engine cleaner has been a proven repair for decades. Before all these fancy cleaners we used to use just plain water and even that worked pretty good for breaking up carbon in the chambers. Once in a while on the old V8's you'd break loose a piece and it would get stuck on top of the piston for awhile and make a hell of a knocking noise. Scared the cr@p out of me the first time it happened, I thought I broke a piston or spun a bearing it was so loud. Ran some more water through it and took it out and beat on it, piece went through and motor was fine.

Trans fluid also was a common thing to use for top engine cleaning, as was kerosene or diesel fuel. Trans fluid would smoke like crazy though. SeaFoam does work, probably as good as any of the dumbed down environmentally friendly solvents we have now. GM's old "Top Engine Cleaner" was the best until they pretty much killed it. You can still get it but in thimble sized containers.

And yes, LNF's carbon valves, pretty badly. I would top engine clean every 20k or so if you don't have meth. Change oil AFTER cleaning the top end.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #13  
gmtech16450yz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Grishbok
not another seafoam discussion... there is no hard evidence that this stuff works and is generally recomended as a last ditch effort to free a valve that is stuck due to carbon buildup.

The recent additives in shell "V power" do a pretty good job at keeping residue buildup to a minimum.
Wrong. Not on a DI motor.

My post above should eliminate any SeaFoam discussion. It works as well as anything. We don't have many choices since the greeniacs struck.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 12:13 PM
  #14  
northvibe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-07-06
Posts: 14,121
Likes: 11
From: Minnesota
a DI engine isnt like your old v8's. You'd be better off running meth.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 12:19 PM
  #15  
68Vette's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-13-09
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by gmtech16450yz
Wrong. Not on a DI motor.

My post above should eliminate any SeaFoam discussion. It works as well as anything. We don't have many choices since the greeniacs struck.
Shell is false advertising then because according to their web site, they are using detergents to minimize the build-up in DI engines.

Link: Shell V-Power® - United States
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 12:20 PM
  #16  
094doorSS/TC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-10
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
From: bay area, CA
Originally Posted by Grishbok
not another seafoam discussion... there is no hard evidence that this stuff works and is generally recomended as a last ditch effort to free a valve that is stuck due to carbon buildup.

The recent additives in shell "V power" do a pretty good job at keeping residue buildup to a minimum.
How is gas going to clean the valves in a DI motor?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 12:53 PM
  #17  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
Originally Posted by Grishbok
not another seafoam discussion... there is no hard evidence that this stuff works and is generally recomended as a last ditch effort to free a valve that is stuck due to carbon buildup.

The recent additives in shell "V power" do a pretty good job at keeping residue buildup to a minimum.
It wont help on our intake valve. Only the exhaust valve
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 01:10 PM
  #18  
Grishbok's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-10
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by 094doorSS/TC
How is gas going to clean the valves in a DI motor?
Not gas, detergents. All gas IS created equal, the difference in the stuff you get at the gas stations is the detergents added to the gas. Different detergents = different price, but they all start out with same stuff, then each company adds its own detergents/additives.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 02:04 PM
  #19  
094doorSS/TC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-10
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
From: bay area, CA
Originally Posted by Grishbok
Not gas, detergents. All gas IS created equal, the difference in the stuff you get at the gas stations is the detergents added to the gas. Different detergents = different price, but they all start out with same stuff, then each company adds its own detergents/additives.
If the gas (or the detergents in the gas) no longer go though the intake valve to get to the combustion chamber, witch is what DI does, it bypass the intake vavle and shoots the gas directly in the combustion chamber how would gas clean up the backside of the valve?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 02:14 PM
  #20  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
Originally Posted by Grishbok
Not gas, detergents. All gas IS created equal, the difference in the stuff you get at the gas stations is the detergents added to the gas. Different detergents = different price, but they all start out with same stuff, then each company adds its own detergents/additives.
He was pointing to the fact that gas and detergents don't matter because gas doesn't pass over our intake valves. Hence why they gum up. Direct Injection baby.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 02:27 PM
  #21  
Grishbok's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-10
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by umrdyldo
He was pointing to the fact that gas and detergents don't matter because gas doesn't pass over our intake valves. Hence why they gum up. Direct Injection baby.
Oh sorry, i got confused.. probably because i never alluded to that or implied it did, merely that it creates less residue post combustion.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #22  
Zander916's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-08
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 1
From: Iowa
almost 71k miles... no seafoam or special treatments (although I agree its not a bad idea).... no problems.

Sludge shouldn't be a concern. There's plenty of other reliability issues to keep you busy.

Last edited by Zander916; Mar 12, 2011 at 11:46 PM. Reason: fixed doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2011 | 11:39 PM
  #23  
army_greywolf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-30-09
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Fond Du Lac, WI
when i took the intake off you could still see the bare metal on the intake valves, and i DO run meth.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:07 PM
cw383
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
12
Sep 30, 2015 12:41 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.