Cobalt SS Network

2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Some LNF #'s w/ upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2007, 05:00 PM
  #51  
New Member
 
sn1p3rw0lf's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-19-07
Location: Venus, PA
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cakeeater
....why does everyone think that turbos are ricey? ever heard of the mustang svo, the buick grand national, the turbo firebird/TA's,


Great cars (ugh... minus the ford! hehe )
sn1p3rw0lf is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-05-2007, 05:12 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
cakeeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sn1p3rw0lf


Great cars (ugh... minus the ford! hehe )
still one of the stronger turbo 4 cylinders to ever hit the market, and it started quite a trend of performance 4 cylinders...i'd say a pretty great car for its time.
cakeeater is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-05-2007, 05:33 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
OniMirage's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-05
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pyros777
I'll admit I jumped the gun on the S/C version, knowing that the turbo wasnt far off. When I try to visualize trading in for the SS T/C though, I just can't bring myself to do it! I love my S/C whine!!
compound charging for the win whiiiiiIIIIIIIINE pshhh whiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIINE pshhh
OniMirage is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-05-2007, 05:46 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Scythe_Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-06
Location: Matteson, Illinois
Posts: 7,874
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Brandon97Z
Show me an LSJ running almost 260whp from a tune alone. The guys running those numbers with the LSJ's are running delicate tunes w/ full bolt-ons and meth injection. Not to mention the Cobalt with the LNF will see higher numbers due to less drivetrain loss.
I thought ralliartist was running in the 13's on a stock LSJ (part wise) just with driver mods and tunes, and maybe traction mods?

Originally Posted by brentil
Not yet, people are still trying to get the tuning and mods down right. The Hahn Stage IV base Solstice is in the 11s though with a bolt on Turbo kit, so I'm pretty sure we can do 12s once we get everything down with the engine.
That's also a 2.4L solstice (LE5?). Not a LNF engine. The 2.4L I wouldn't doubt would be much easier to get into those numbers. That car has between 400-500rwhp.

Originally Posted by JCswoosher2
In all the LNF will be better. We all know it. We probably just wont admit that we jumped the gun on the SC version. But for myself. I would rather have a SC car than a TC. But power wise, get ready SC's
I didn't jump the gun. I wanted the LSJ more than the LNF.
Scythe_Snake is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-05-2007, 07:34 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-13-04
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Scythe_Snake
That's also a 2.4L solstice (LE5?). Not a LNF engine. The 2.4L I wouldn't doubt would be much easier to get into those numbers. That car has between 400-500rwhp.
Yeah that was a 2.4l but its NA from the factory, LNF being turbo from the factory would make one think it would have stronger internals. But yeah the hahn 2.4 stage 4 had 390whp the last i saw.
Brandon97Z is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-05-2007, 07:50 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
shabodah's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-21-06
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There are Solstices in the 9's, but they aren't running I4's, lol.
shabodah is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-05-2007, 09:13 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-03-05
Location: South Bend , Indiana
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sn1p3rw0lf


Great cars (ugh... minus the ford! hehe )
I take it youve never seen what the lil turbo 2.3's can do , lol ....especially when their in a light notch . The original 84-86 SVO's are badass
SilverSS/SC is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-05-2007, 10:37 PM
  #58  
Member
 
SpecialK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-09-06
Location: Lyons
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SilverSS/SC
I take it youve never seen what the lil turbo 2.3's can do , lol ....especially when their in a light notch . The original 84-86 SVO's are badass
As long as they have at least a boost controller. In stock form they were pathetic.
SpecialK is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-05-2007, 10:40 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-03-05
Location: South Bend , Indiana
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpecialK
As long as they have at least a boost controller. In stock form they were pathetic.
The 2.3's I was refering to are faaaar from stock , hehehe .
SilverSS/SC is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-06-2007, 11:31 AM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
cakeeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpecialK
As long as they have at least a boost controller. In stock form they were pathetic.
pathetic compared to what? they would smoke any of the competition on the road course EASILY.
cakeeater is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-06-2007, 01:42 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
1gmfanatik's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-26-06
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
*cough* GM RULEZ!! *cough*

I uh, meant GM....fanatik, as in me..That's my story and I'm stickin to it
1gmfanatik is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-06-2007, 01:59 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
07cobaltss's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-06-06
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i personaly not a fan of numbers and not getting to drive it/see it myself. until then i'm not a fan.
07cobaltss is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-06-2007, 03:59 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
cakeeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1gmfanatik
*cough* GM RULEZ!! *cough*

I uh, meant GM....fanatik, as in me..That's my story and I'm stickin to it
mmmm i'd like to put an sho against a same gen trans am on a road course.... svo = 40 trillion miles out in front.
cakeeater is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-06-2007, 04:06 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
1gmfanatik's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-26-06
Location: Marlton, NJ
Posts: 9,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cakeeater
mmmm i'd like to put an sho against a same gen trans am on a road course.... svo = 40 trillion miles out in front.
Blah Blah Blah...I was just talking about GM in general. Don't get your panties in a bunch.
1gmfanatik is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-07-2007, 02:25 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
chevysalesman614's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: new jersey
Posts: 4,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gm, is this just more hype, or is this for real? (havent been on here in like 6 weeks)
chevysalesman614 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-07-2007, 05:11 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
lewisb13's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-07
Location: Home: Utica, MI Current Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone heard the numbers as far as what the stock LNF internals are good up to HPwise?
lewisb13 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-08-2007, 10:30 PM
  #67  
New Member
 
Suaveat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-23-07
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cakeeater
mmmm i'd like to put an sho against a same gen trans am on a road course.... svo = 40 trillion miles out in front.
Do yuo have any times from a road course from say SCAA racing or any other? Are you comparing stock vs. stock or mod vs mod?
Suaveat69 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-12-2007, 07:00 PM
  #68  
Member
 
KlugSRT-4's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-07
Location: NE
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blk06ss/sc
what about swapping with a srt4 turbo
........ha you can have mine.
KlugSRT-4 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 12-08-2007, 09:08 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-09-06
Location: PA
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XM15
True, but at least the LNF cobalt guys won't have to be the guinea pigs like the LSJ guys are. They can look and see what works and doesn't work from the RL and GXP owners.
Its never good being a guinea pig, thats why I wish I would of went back to my old root of 60s muscle cars...
R&C_rallySS is offline  
Reply Like
Old 12-23-2007, 11:47 PM
  #70  
Member
 
SpecialK's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-09-06
Location: Lyons
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cakeeater
pathetic compared to what? they would smoke any of the competition on the road course EASILY.

Compared to a moped. And as far as a road course is concerned they were some of the lightest and best balanced stangs around yes. But one bad move on a drivers part adn they lost all their momentum.
SpecialK is offline  
Reply Like
Old 03-09-2008, 04:47 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
stage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-28-07
Location: canada
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would go and buy ss/tc but after putting 3,000$ mods in my car....not sure that i wanna go and buy this now
stage2 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 03-09-2008, 11:32 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Archie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-23-07
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lewisb13
Has anyone heard the numbers as far as what the stock LNF internals are good up to HPwise?
So far, it has made 330hp and 425ft/lbs with just a tune by GM.
Archie is offline  
Reply Like
Old 03-10-2008, 02:11 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
cakeeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Archie
So far, it has made 330hp and 425ft/lbs with just a tune by GM.
just a tune? i doubt that very much.
cakeeater is offline  
Reply Like
Old 03-10-2008, 02:13 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
hatrickstu's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-05
Location: Ar-kan-sas
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cakeeater
just a tune? i doubt that very much.
tune and 3 inch catless. its on their site
hatrickstu is offline  
Reply Like
Old 03-10-2008, 02:41 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
EtyrnuSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BULLETSSMOKE
They should've kept the SC, its just American and non-rice (IMO!!!) for a American car to have its power from a fat V8 or a whiny ass supercharger tearin up the streets.
Well, you can blame our "wonderful" enviromentalist hippie I-want-to-tell-you-how-to-live asshats and congress for the demise of supercharged production cars. ZR1 excepted of course.

On topic, its cool. If I didn't already have the SC, I would be looking at one of these.
EtyrnuSS is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Some LNF #'s w/ upgrades


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.