2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Taking the Turbobalt to the dyno.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #1  
choko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-20-08
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Taking the Turbobalt to the dyno.

Taking the car in Tues to get dyno'd

Gonna see what the baseline is as i guarantee it will put 260+ to the wheels.

All i have done is, thinner filter and muffler delete with straight pipe and stock tip i welded back on.

Ill keep updating.

Also, for anyone racing at the track like i always am.

If you wanna run 13.5 - 13.7 @ Sea level. and not 14's like most have done that i seen.

Turn on compet. mode. but do not do full RPM clutch dump like most do.

Launch at like 4k and 3 way clutch brake gas to brake boost a bit and then ride clutch out a bit. then for 2nd,3rd etc. do no lift shifting
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
RageTechnologies's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-04-08
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
What kind of dyno? We have one coming in a week so we can get some baselines and some measurements on a few things.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #3  
ecotecon18s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-06
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
From: Mulberry, Florida
didnt somebody already dyno their stock SS/TC??? 237whp and 258 wtq
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
RageTechnologies's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-04-08
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by ecotecon18s
didnt somebody already dyno their stock SS/TC??? 237whp and 258 wtq
yes but this guy has done a few welfare (not trying to crack but thats what they usually call them) mods to his. PLus it may be on a different type of dyno. I'm all for seeing any graph i can.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #5  
Aaron@Realtune's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-07-08
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by RageTechnologies
What kind of dyno? We have one coming in a week so we can get some baselines and some measurements on a few things.

I spy Nemo!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:03 PM
  #6  
ecotecon18s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-06
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
From: Mulberry, Florida
Originally Posted by RageTechnologies
yes but this guy has done a few welfare (not trying to crack but thats what they usually call them) mods to his. PLus it may be on a different type of dyno. I'm all for seeing any graph i can.
I thought he said it was STOCK. oh well. and they did it on a dynapack hub dyno...arent those supposed to be the most accurate??
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:06 PM
  #7  
RageTechnologies's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-04-08
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by Aaron@Realtune
I spy Nemo!
Nope. Its Shea Nice to see you on board!

Originally Posted by ecotecon18s
I thought he said it was STOCK. oh well. and they did it on a dynapack hub dyno...arent those supposed to be the most accurate??
i'm not going to get into which dyno is most accurate. Its more of an opinion thing. You can argue until your blue in the face why one dyno may be more accurate then another. That debate will go on forever.

Last edited by RageTechnologies; Jun 21, 2008 at 08:06 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #8  
Aaron@Realtune's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-07-08
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by RageTechnologies
Nope. Its Shea Nice to see you on board!


Hey Shea! I have been looming for awhile now. First post was the one above

BTW, what was the 138mph exactly. We went 138.67

Originally Posted by RageTechnologies
Nope. Its Shea Nice to see you on board!



i'm not going to get into which dyno is most accurate. Its more of an opinion thing. You can argue until your blue in the face why one dyno may be more accurate then another. That debate will go on forever.


The most accurate dyno is the track. Discussion over

Last edited by Aaron@Realtune; Jun 21, 2008 at 08:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #9  
bigrroberto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-30-06
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Alberta
even with the ghetto mods it wont put 260 to the wheeeeels. You'll be dissapointed.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:11 PM
  #10  
ecotecon18s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-06
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
From: Mulberry, Florida
Originally Posted by RageTechnologies
Nope. Its Shea Nice to see you on board!



i'm not going to get into which dyno is most accurate. Its more of an opinion thing. You can argue until your blue in the face why one dyno may be more accurate then another. That debate will go on forever.
true. I just hear so many different things. this dyno is conservative, this dyno wasn't corrected, this dyno reads too high...etc.

I guess the world may never know...

Originally Posted by Aaron@Realtune
Hey Shea! I have been looming for awhile now. First post was the one above

BTW, what was the 138mph exactly. We went 138.67





The most accurate dyno is the track. Discussion over
This may be true, but it has to be the same track and the same version driver mod has to be installed...

Last edited by ecotecon18s; Jun 21, 2008 at 08:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #11  
RageTechnologies's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-04-08
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by Aaron@Realtune
Hey Shea! I have been looming for awhile now. First post was the one above

BTW, what was the 138mph exactly. We went 138.67





The most accurate dyno is the track. Discussion over
Bingo!

I'll have to dig up the slip to get the exact mph.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #12  
choko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-20-08
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
updates to come.

Last edited by choko; Jun 25, 2008 at 06:25 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #13  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
when the turbos come out now here come all the power junkies

be curious to see if you shops are still around these parts 2 years from now unlike alot of the SS/SC vendors...

good luck.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #14  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-18-06
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by choko
haha. ghetto mods. ' Let me explain, while you and most spend alot of $ on mods from vendors that have noe track or proven dyno results and i have a mandrel bender'
I test and true my mods, if they do not prove at the track and dyno, on to the next CAD design.
1st.
Let me run down i been in GM High Tech Mag 3 times.
Ive had some pretty fast cars buddy.

Currently have 08 TBSS 500whp trailblazer
had 9 & 10 sec cars in over the years including a 98 2.4 60 mill turbo cavalier runing 11.20's at 126

Im no kid coming on here dreaming. i know cars,i know motors..

I took a SRT and dynoed higher then other SRT's.

Reason being? I break in all my cars the same way i break in new drag motors on the dyno ' Hard' if they blow up/something was wrong and off.

I have 300 HARD acel and motor decel miles on the car,

Im going to dyno it on a Dynot jet, and then a Hub dyno hopefully friday.

Not trying to come off cocky but im not no 18 year old kid in a new factory turbo car.

Im coming on here to help and put some insight on these cars. thats all.

Well thats kinda odd... Id love to see two cars dyno'd that make the same power, then you do ur right foot power adder and dyno them again. Im sorry but it sounds like a load of crap. So you know cars thats great, alot of guys here do. All respect to you being able to afford and mod slow cars and make them fast. All your saying is I have money and I like cars, I have nothing in the post worth saying cept Ill have the most bestest TC/SS out there but no graphs or anything to post about it.

I just kind of get the sense of a LIQUID NIGHTMARE!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #15  
njg5gt's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 08-04-07
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: Nutley, NJ
i say we stop doubting him until we see the dyno numbers. and then, if they aren't what he expected, we talk **** then. you guys don't know anything about him and neither do i. why flame just because he states he's done something different to a new car? im holding out to see the numbers.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #16  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-18-06
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
All he said is Im going to dyno a car, and Ive owned fast stuff.

Ok.... Great thread!!!

Now make one when he actually does something...?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #17  
Jn2's Avatar
Jn2
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-04-07
Posts: 7,791
Likes: 3
From: Texas
why must there always be a aruement, this ss/tc thing is going to get to the point of ss/sc>gto conversations/threads/etc


ps-ss/tc>gto
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #18  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-18-06
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Im not trying to argue, I want to see some numbers instead of hearing how driving a motor hard will make it magically faster.

Ive heard it done before, but Ive never ever seen it come back with positive results.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #19  
choko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-20-08
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by IonNinja
when the turbos come out now here come all the power junkies

be curious to see if you shops are still around these parts 2 years from now unlike alot of the SS/SC vendors...

good luck.
I dont do sales/vendoring. just a hobby.

actually i own a CPA company to be exact for 7 years.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #20  
Super_SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-12-07
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
From: N. Side Chi-Town
u will not run 13.5-13.8..maybe 13.9-14.4
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #21  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-18-06
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Also, with new cars using PCMs etc, the first miles on it shouldnt be hard, the computer needs to learn the motor. With modern motors I really dont see what driving it hard would accomplish. People say it seats the rings better, but I really dont think ull beable to tell from a dyno or even butt dyno either way.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #22  
BACK2GM's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: Peoria,AZ
Originally Posted by Super_SS
u will not run 13.5-13.8..maybe 13.9-14.4
Well he's giving specific directions on "how to" for people that haven't ran yet
or that are still in the 14's, So maybe he has?

Nobody thought 14.1 or 14.2 was a possibility in a "stock" Lsj but, it happened.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #23  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
Originally Posted by choko
Not trying to come off cocky

too late
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #24  
05redline's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 04-23-06
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Originally Posted by choko
Gonna see what the baseline is as i guarantee it will put 260+ to the wheels.
I guarantee it won't, but I'd be interested in seeing what it does.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2008 | 08:23 AM
  #25  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I wanna know what he ran at the track, cause he is making it sound like he has pulled a 13.5 out of his car. and if he claims that, then I call BULLSHIT!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 PM.