At the track with stock turbo...
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Senior Member
Joined: 10-08-06
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
FF ace is looking to make a streetable monster, he is weighing porting his head or keeping the stock head. I think thats why he is asking why you ditched it. Drive ability issues or just not worth the gains?
New Member
Joined: 11-01-09
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in time
Current setup is:
stock turbo
stock airbox with ZZP mod
KN filter
ZZP silicone intake
ZZP charge tubes
ZZP IC
ZZP DP/shorty catback
ZZP transmission with 4.45 final drive
ZZP stage 4 clutch
ZZP clutch rod
Fidanza aluminum flywheel
ZZP valvesprings
SSC lowering springs
LSJ front brakes
15" front rims with Mickey T 26x10 slicks.
running on E85
Dyno tune on raised fuel pressure
I didn't have time to tune in the dual fuel rail setup, so I put the stock intake manifold back on. I put it on the dyno this morning and it put down 359whp sae corrected, (371whp uncorrected!)
First pass today, I got a nice burnout and launch, but could have shifted better. Here are the intervals:
60' 1.7189
330' 4.8487
1/8 7.4449
mph 95.61
1000' 9.6996
mph 107.65
1/4 11.6276
mph 116.81
For the 2nd pass, I got another good burnout, but the starter accidentally clicked start and timed me out before I finished staging. I had to wait for the other car to finish and turn off, then he couldn't get the tree to reset for some reason. Anyway, the slicks got cold and I spun pretty bad on this pass. I did shift better and ended up running slightly quicker-
60' 1.7647
330' 4.9027
1/8 7.4850
mph 96.02
1000' 9.7257
mph 109.21
1/4 11.6250
mph 118.94
For the 3rd pass, I was looking for an 11.5 at 120. The sun got low and the air got better. A good launch and 3 NLSs should have got me there. Unfortunately, I finally broke a stock axle on the launch.
I should be trapping a little higher, but these 26" slicks always scrub off some mph. They are all wrong for the 4.45 final drive, too. I could run 4th all the way to 140mph. Either way, they worked well enough...
Next on the list- ZZP LNF cam testing.
stock turbo
stock airbox with ZZP mod
KN filter
ZZP silicone intake
ZZP charge tubes
ZZP IC
ZZP DP/shorty catback
ZZP transmission with 4.45 final drive
ZZP stage 4 clutch
ZZP clutch rod
Fidanza aluminum flywheel
ZZP valvesprings
SSC lowering springs
LSJ front brakes
15" front rims with Mickey T 26x10 slicks.
running on E85
Dyno tune on raised fuel pressure
I didn't have time to tune in the dual fuel rail setup, so I put the stock intake manifold back on. I put it on the dyno this morning and it put down 359whp sae corrected, (371whp uncorrected!)
First pass today, I got a nice burnout and launch, but could have shifted better. Here are the intervals:
60' 1.7189
330' 4.8487
1/8 7.4449
mph 95.61
1000' 9.6996
mph 107.65
1/4 11.6276
mph 116.81
For the 2nd pass, I got another good burnout, but the starter accidentally clicked start and timed me out before I finished staging. I had to wait for the other car to finish and turn off, then he couldn't get the tree to reset for some reason. Anyway, the slicks got cold and I spun pretty bad on this pass. I did shift better and ended up running slightly quicker-
60' 1.7647
330' 4.9027
1/8 7.4850
mph 96.02
1000' 9.7257
mph 109.21
1/4 11.6250
mph 118.94
For the 3rd pass, I was looking for an 11.5 at 120. The sun got low and the air got better. A good launch and 3 NLSs should have got me there. Unfortunately, I finally broke a stock axle on the launch.
I should be trapping a little higher, but these 26" slicks always scrub off some mph. They are all wrong for the 4.45 final drive, too. I could run 4th all the way to 140mph. Either way, they worked well enough...
Next on the list- ZZP LNF cam testing.
You have enough cam pump with bumped rail pressure for E85?
Oh this **** just got real good
Nice runs man, and that is a pretty mean set up
New Member
Joined: 11-01-09
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in time
New Member
Joined: 11-01-09
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in time
I see how it was done now.
Do you use the port fuelers above a certain load?
There's finer atomization offered at higher rpms and read that you are using the DI system to do the brunt of the work as it is...almost like a dual shower set up on a F1 car, or close to how the dual injector setups run on bikes.
Do you use the port fuelers above a certain load?
There's finer atomization offered at higher rpms and read that you are using the DI system to do the brunt of the work as it is...almost like a dual shower set up on a F1 car, or close to how the dual injector setups run on bikes.
