2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

At the track with stock turbo...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:20 PM
  #126  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Ahh, I see. The DI fuel rail is built like a tank. I'm not worried.

Boost starts around 24 and fades to 17, or less if I rev high enough. With enough timing, HP stays flat close to 7k.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #127  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Matt M
Ahh, I see. The DI fuel rail is built like a tank. I'm not worried.

Boost starts around 24 and fades to 17, or less if I rev high enough. With enough timing, HP stays flat close to 7k.
Nice. It is a well built fuel rail, it would just make me nervous. Guess we'll find out, won't we!

Surprised you aren't running more boost, honestly. GREAT numbers!
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #128  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by mkriebs
Nice. It is a well built fuel rail, it would just make me nervous. Guess we'll find out, won't we!

Surprised you aren't running more boost, honestly. GREAT numbers!
That's all the boost it has to give. I can phase the cams different and get more boost, but less power.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:40 PM
  #129  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Matt M
That's all the boost it has to give. I can phase the cams different and get more boost, but less power.
Gotcha. When you going back to the big turbo and E85

I wanna see it when that happens
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:42 PM
  #130  
spike's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-01-06
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 1
From: IN
nice times
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:46 PM
  #131  
Perfect.disguise's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
I can't wait to get slicks. I bet 1.7 60' in a fwd is a head rush. Nice vid.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #132  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by mkriebs
Gotcha. When you going back to the big turbo and E85

I wanna see it when that happens
Have to test cams with this turbo first.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:51 PM
  #133  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Perfect.disguise
I can't wait to get slicks. I bet 1.7 60' in a fwd is a head rush. Nice vid.
Meh, not so much. My other FWD pulls 1.3 sixties.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 10:58 PM
  #134  
Perfect.disguise's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
All about prospective I guess, when your coming from a best of a 2.1 on streets a 1.7 should be noticeable.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #135  
imphat0260's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-16-08
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: STL
Originally Posted by Matt M
Meh, not so much. My other FWD pulls 1.3 sixties.
The Race Car? That thing is SICK!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 05:46 AM
  #136  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Matt, how much advance are you running? I'm up to 25.5* 3k & up with no KR on 50% E
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 08:59 AM
  #137  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Iam Broke
Matt, how much advance are you running? I'm up to 25.5* 3k & up with no KR on 50% E
I think I am starting out around 24, but climbing to as much as 27.5 at higher RPMs.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 09:18 AM
  #138  
jb09ss's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-01-09
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: causapscal, qc
Originally Posted by mkriebs
Nice times Matt! Wonder how big of a hole that fuel rail will put in the hood when it blows up! Lol. That would make me pretty nervous!
The fuel rail will not blow up. High pressure systems are always designed with a high safety factor, to guarantee that the stress they see is always under the fatigue point of the material, or under the desired stress vs number of cycle a part has to achieve, depending of the material used. I engineer hydraulic cylinders used in everything from oil field to forestry equipments, and every hydraulic related parts are designed this way. The lower safety factor we use for critical parts is 3:1, most of the time it's higher. Going from 2200 psi to 2800 is not dangerous. If the rail was designed with such a low safety factor that a 25-30% in pressure could blow it up, they would crack all the time from simple things as variations in the raw materials to machining imperfections and would never last for the life of the car.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 09:21 AM
  #139  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Matt M
I think I am starting out around 24, but climbing to as much as 27.5 at higher RPMs.
Hm I wonder if the rod bearings are going to like that much timing? I guess only time will tell because there are only a few who are running this much timing.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 09:31 AM
  #140  
redcomet303's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-08
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
keep it up guys im excited to see the numbers you get with cams.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #141  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Hm I wonder if the rod bearings are going to like that much timing? I guess only time will tell because there are only a few who are running this much timing.
Without knock, I'd think you could run more timing yet and not worry about bearings. It's not as bad as running 20 degrees of timing on gas and always having some knock.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 07:28 AM
  #142  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Well, I loaded the 2800 psi Trifecta base file, did a pull and still tripped the P0087 Low Fuel Rail pressure at 6300 rpm in third on a 75% ethanol fill. Granted I'm exceeding 350% air load with the MAF freq tables raped 27% positive to get enough fuel, but IDK how you do it unless the 4.45 axle takes enough load off. Running .90 PE lambda. Any input appreciated Matt.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 08:17 AM
  #143  
WSFrazier's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Matt M
Without knock, I'd think you could run more timing yet and not worry about bearings. It's not as bad as running 20 degrees of timing on gas and always having some knock.
+1 Near 7-7.5k I am also close to 27.5-28* timing on a 2.7" TVS. 80k+ miles on stock bottom end and still going strong.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #144  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Iam Broke
Well, I loaded the 2800 psi Trifecta base file, did a pull and still tripped the P0087 Low Fuel Rail pressure at 6300 rpm in third on a 75% ethanol fill. Granted I'm exceeding 350% air load with the MAF freq tables raped 27% positive to get enough fuel, but IDK how you do it unless the 4.45 axle takes enough load off. Running .90 PE lambda. Any input appreciated Matt.
It sounds like one of your pumps is not keeping up then.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #145  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Yep, but which one? Did you replace the in tank pump or are yours both stock?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 12:14 PM
  #146  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Iam Broke
Yep, but which one? Did you replace the in tank pump or are yours both stock?
Both stock. As I was saying earlier in the thread- you could read fuel pressure at the inlet of the mechanical pump to see if the in-tank pump is keeping up.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #147  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Ya, I worked very late last night so I haven't had a chance to look into the hardware needed to monitor it. I'll have to sort it out. Thanks for replying. I logged over 31 lb/min VE airflow in the midrange last night before it popped the CEL.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 12:58 PM
  #148  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
If you remove the valve core and then install one of these fittings, then you can use a 1/8" npt sensor. ZZP adapter
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #149  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Shameless plug.

I found a sensor in HPT for fuel pressure, IDK which one it is though. I'll try and log it tonight to see.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 01:45 PM
  #150  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Tom, I think thats the high pressure one. I tried logging it a while ago, but never did get it to work. So, purely speculation.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.