2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Weird Looking Dynos!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2011 | 06:34 PM
  #26  
Wickedlsj's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-10-05
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: In my car
Originally Posted by pbass
Yeah, a LOT of tuning variations were tried so I agree, it is something mechanical. WG was left as Bryan set it. Catless DP will be installed this week.
It could be any number of things but that looks a lot like tune issues rather than something mechanical. Regardless, the logs are the only way to see what's going on.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #27  
hunter19707's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-02-09
Posts: 2,669
Likes: 1
From: The Buckeye State
I'd like to see how this turns out with the catless dp. In for results. I'm already putting down over 350lbs. wtq with the stock ko4 on TF tune.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 01:00 PM
  #28  
pbass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 09-05-10
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Yeah, Ray's gonna dyno it when he gets the DP so I'll post that here (reminder to self to ask him to send it). If it gets rid of the squiggle, I'm good with it.

I don't care what the HP is at this point, although I was hoping for 350. I just want my car back, but if HP doesn't improve, I'm not sure I can say much for the turbo.

In fact, just looking at what I have already on those dynos . . . well, with GMS1 plus the Injen CAI and hotside, I got 272.

Then I added a Dejon coldside, Treadstone TR8 IC, a catted DP, a righteous tune, AND the 2860, and got 313 or a gain of 41 hp, which I would have expected from all that stuff WITHOUT the turbo.

Anyway, whatever the dyno says, I'll post it here as soon as it's available.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 02:45 PM
  #29  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
I tried everything and anything on this car. Different AFR, Boost levels, ramping the boost different, cam changes, stock timing, more timing etc.. 17 pulls and all looked the same above 5500.

The only thing that worries me is his past dyno dies hard up top as well. This car had like 4800 miles on it only!!
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 04:26 PM
  #30  
drewbroo's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 12-21-08
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
From: TUCSON AZ
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
I tried everything and anything on this car. Different AFR, Boost levels, ramping the boost different, cam changes, stock timing, more timing etc.. 17 pulls and all looked the same above 5500.

The only thing that worries me is his past dyno dies hard up top as well. This car had like 4800 miles on it only!!
Could it be his cams itself?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 09:20 AM
  #31  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
I told Ray to pull the Valve Cover and look around, everything looked ok, but that's only a quick visual inspection. They are supposed to be getting a catless DP to test on the car to see if it helps. If it removes those 2 dips and leaves a smooth graph I think Kurt would be happy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM
Getaway_Driver
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
40
Sep 10, 2015 09:11 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.