2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

What Does a 625+ WHP LNF Look Like?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #76  
Mike08ss/tc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-25-09
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh, NY
That is def a big booboo. I can just imagine what it will be like when it is back on the streets.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #77  
overboostedss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-16-09
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: Wi
450 500
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 08:47 PM
  #78  
cmiller8006's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-29-08
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by overboostedss
450 500
On what fuel? I know Matt has been in the 5's with the stock fuel system and race gas. I also think he ran 500 or more with just the upgraded cams, I may be wrong on that though.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 08:54 PM
  #79  
overboostedss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-16-09
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: Wi
E-85, 93s barely available around me
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 09:04 PM
  #80  
Sweetsandman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: 01-15-09
Posts: 4,323
Likes: 0
From: Parma, OH
Impressive! I'm surprised it made it there! I'm also surprised it was still running after that happened lol!!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 09:04 PM
  #81  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
didnt black push 600's in stock form on an lsj. dun dun dun
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #82  
mongorat427's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: 07-23-09
Posts: 6,062
Likes: 9
From: pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Matt M
The craziest thing about this is that the engine didn't stall. It just changed pitch quite a bit and sounded rough. I brought it to a stop and then turned it off with the key. Of course there was a decent amount of smoke, but it was still running!
Ha Ha I blew a big block at 8000 rpm and one rod came thru the block and oil pan and stuck 2 inchs into the crossmember. I drove it onto the trailer. The piston was buried in the side of the block
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 09:20 PM
  #83  
jboogie's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 06-22-09
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 1
From: western NC
That block would make a great table in my man cave!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 09:47 PM
  #84  
80vetteL82's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-13-08
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 0
From: Waltham MA
Originally Posted by Matt M
The craziest thing about this is that the engine didn't stall. It just changed pitch quite a bit and sounded rough. I brought it to a stop and then turned it off with the key. Of course there was a decent amount of smoke, but it was still running!
haha thats awesome!

BTW.... I need a DP, hook me up! ...but seriously, any chance on any sales or GB's coming up?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 10:54 PM
  #85  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by IonNinja
How long did the motor last at this power level?
A couple hundred dyno pulls over 400whp. Probably 100 or so above 500whp. About a dozen pulls at 600+.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2011 | 10:57 PM
  #86  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by overboostedss
What about the extra fuel rail
I wasn't running the secondary fuel rail. We came up with a much less expensive, much easier to install setup in place of the upper rail port injection
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 12:01 AM
  #87  
bogalusahondakiller's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-10
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
From: Bogalusa
i want 500 now... wish i would have bought a turbo upgrade instead of bolt ons now
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 01:05 AM
  #88  
JustACobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-22-11
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by Matt M
I wasn't running the secondary fuel rail. We came up with a much less expensive, much easier to install setup in place of the upper rail port injection
thats what i like to hear!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 01:13 AM
  #89  
utsadude's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-31-08
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by JustACobalt
thats what i like to hear!
You didn't hear? They took a 1/4 inch drill bit and drilled all the way through the injector.

Firing is a little random, but big horsepower is worth it.

[ waits for "I screwed up my injectors" thread ]


























[/waiting]
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 01:20 AM
  #90  
JustACobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-22-11
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
i heard about them experimenting with that but im just glad it wasnt the hpfp that couldnt keep up. @ around 390 whp, i was starting to get worried about fueling limits
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 01:23 AM
  #91  
utsadude's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-31-08
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Texas
:facepalm:
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 01:53 AM
  #92  
FasterIsBetter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 2
From: South Charleston, WV
Originally Posted by Matt M
I wasn't running the secondary fuel rail. We came up with a much less expensive, much easier to install setup in place of the upper rail port injection
Hey....I see your crank......

And have you discovered the power limits for when just upgrading to your rods and wiseco pistons? Are they even capable of being reached in a fwd car?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 01:58 AM
  #93  
40rty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-11-08
Posts: 3,888
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by Matt M
I wasn't running the secondary fuel rail. We came up with a much less expensive, much easier to install setup in place of the upper rail port injection

Can this system work with the Sky Redline? Will this be available by the end of the year?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 02:04 AM
  #94  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
Originally Posted by 40rty
Can this system work with the Sky Redline? Will this be available by the end of the year?


Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 09:52 AM
  #95  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by FasterIsBetter
Hey....I see your crank......

And have you discovered the power limits for when just upgrading to your rods and wiseco pistons? Are they even capable of being reached in a fwd car?
We have not pushed a setup like that very far yet, unfortunately.

Originally Posted by 40rty
Can this system work with the Sky Redline? Will this be available by the end of the year?
Yes, it should work in the Kappas.

Last edited by Matt M; Jun 23, 2011 at 09:52 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 10:04 AM
  #96  
defo98's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-16-09
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey then. Now Orlando Florida
Originally Posted by Omnigear


haha the mexicans at my work say that all the time!
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #97  
FF_ace's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-06
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Originally Posted by Matt M
We have not pushed a setup like that very far yet, unfortunately.
I wouldnt mind trying out some of your fueling upgrade part im running carrilo rods, weisco pistons running a 5857
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 01:49 PM
  #98  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
I don't get why people are so disappointed with the outcome ..... thats close to 700 crank hp on a stock bottom end ..... Maybe 5% of LNF owners will ever need to worry about running power levels like this one did.

The way i see it with all those pulls over 400 and 500whp ....it hasn't had an easy life like someones daily driver with a GM stage kit lol. To me it's pretty damn impressive that it held on as long as it did.

It's kind of amazing that it kept running lol...... did anything make it out the exhaust side to the turbo?

Last edited by rukkee; Jun 23, 2011 at 01:57 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 02:29 PM
  #99  
09CobaltSS1's Avatar
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by rukkee
I don't get why people are so disappointed with the outcome ..... thats close to 700 crank hp on a stock bottom end ..... Maybe 5% of LNF owners will ever need to worry about running power levels like this one did.

The way i see it with all those pulls over 400 and 500whp ....it hasn't had an easy life like someones daily driver with a GM stage kit lol. To me it's pretty damn impressive that it held on as long as it did.

It's kind of amazing that it kept running lol...... did anything make it out the exhaust side to the turbo?
I think most people also weren't really realizing that this was a bone stock LNF bottom end (stock rods, pistons, balance shafts, everything stock) and got caught in comparing it to the built LSJ that ZZP was testing the failure point of their girdle and H-beam rods. Obviously there is a big difference between the 2 bottom ends at that point.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 02:37 PM
  #100  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
All I know is, this is a great motor with lots of potential once fueling is done. Built motor is a breeze, tuning will be done according to consumers needs. Turbo kits are out there with more than 500whp capabilities. ******* awesome engine.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 PM.