2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

1/2 counterweighted cranks vs. fully counterweighted

Old Jan 9, 2014 | 06:35 PM
  #1  
Speedytec's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-19-07
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
From: -
1/2 counterweighted cranks vs. fully counterweighted

One for the engine experts here;

I'm in Europe and the 2.0 LSJ Ecotec is here delivered by Saab as the B207 with a turbo. Now it apears to be that this 2.0 Ecotec engine (LSJ/ Saab B207) has/had 2 different crank designs in it's life...
The early ones, US LSJ + B207 till 2007, came with a 1/2 counterweighted forged crank (4 weights), but the B207 engines from 2007 till 2011 have a fully counterweighted 8CW crank...
Not sure if this later 8CW Saab B207 version is a forged or cast item...
(The newer 2.0 LNF has the same forged 4CW crank, but with a slightly different triggerwheel.)

So, besides the overall weight issue, which design is better for a modified 7,5-8K SC engine? Read that most stock high rpm engines (Honda like etc.) tend to all have a fully counterweighted crank to reduce crank vibrations and bearing life.

So, which one to use? The forged 4C or the (maybe cast) 8CW version?? :wacko:
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2014 | 08:13 PM
  #2  
Tjolley's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-01-11
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 2
From: modesto
well the 4cw lsj crank would be a better choice in my opinion. cuz its light.
just have the entire rotating assembly balanced
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
Jesse
Stuff
0
Oct 1, 2015 05:47 PM
cw383
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
12
Sep 30, 2015 12:41 AM
roth
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 26, 2015 12:16 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 AM.