View Poll Results: Are you interested in a 1.6L Twin Screw Blower?
Yes I would like to see the 1.6L come to the market
149
89.22%
No I am not interested in a bigger blower than the TVS
18
10.78%
Voters: 167. You may not vote on this poll
1.6L Blower Interest
Senior Member
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: North Vancouver BC
I wasn't really asking a question, but thanks for backing it up.
I was just trying to make the point that if you're making excessive heat with the TVS, a bigger blower is not the remedy; engine modification is. Blower efficiency aside, a stock 2.0 LSJ is only going to be able to take so much air.
I was just trying to make the point that if you're making excessive heat with the TVS, a bigger blower is not the remedy; engine modification is. Blower efficiency aside, a stock 2.0 LSJ is only going to be able to take so much air.
hmm.... MP TVS1900... yes... fun...
initial testing yielded 23 psi on a 3.6" pulley, 18* @ 12.0 afr on a 7gph 90/10 mix
Was unfortunately cut short before I could throw a 10gph on and get some dyno graphs.
initial testing yielded 23 psi on a 3.6" pulley, 18* @ 12.0 afr on a 7gph 90/10 mix
Was unfortunately cut short before I could throw a 10gph on and get some dyno graphs.
Senior Member
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I'm going to try it on a big boy motor though. Probably much less boost because of much less restriction, and no worries about breaking anything. I'm also not going to hurt the setup by using a stock intake.
Last edited by ralliartist; Jul 12, 2010 at 07:05 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
When are you going to throw a 10gph nozzle on and get some dyno graphs.
Check the supercharged section on forums.clubrsx.com
they've already broken 400whp on the lysholm 1.6 on 03 octane
that's what Euthanasia's car was to be for... ported this, ported that... 3" intake... etc...
then Kevin disappeared
they've already broken 400whp on the lysholm 1.6 on 03 octane
I'm wanting to try it out. But I'm just up in the air still.
I'm going to try it on a big boy motor though. Probably much less boost because of much less restriction, and no worries about breaking anything. I'm also not going to hurt the setup by using a stock intake.
I'm going to try it on a big boy motor though. Probably much less boost because of much less restriction, and no worries about breaking anything. I'm also not going to hurt the setup by using a stock intake.
then Kevin disappeared
Senior Member
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Yea, kevin is still being real shady about the whole thing. He seemed to be excited about producing the kits again when I first called him a couple months ago, but now he's hard to get ahold of and he keeps saying it's going to take a few more weeks/months.
good luck dealing w/ him
better off looking elsewhere
Senior Member
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Member
Joined: 06-17-10
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Stationed in NY, From Ok
so aparently some people didn't read the entire thing, this isn't a T/C>S/C or S/C>T/C thread. Its just a feeler pretty much. And its got a TON of great info on S/C's in it. If you prefer turbo then go for it. Some people like S/C better. I'm staying S/C b/c i live in NYC right now and never have room to wrap a T/C up. But the S/C is right there (Esp when cabbies are being stupid lol) i'm not trying to bash you man just saying there is no point in posting that. This is great info for alot of guys. ESP those that just don't like turbo. I personally LOVE the sound of a BOV but thats neither here nor there.
