2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.
View Poll Results: Are you interested in a 1.6L Twin Screw Blower?
Yes I would like to see the 1.6L come to the market
149
89.22%
No I am not interested in a bigger blower than the TVS
18
10.78%
Voters: 167. You may not vote on this poll

1.6L Blower Interest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 08:50 AM
  #176  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
ah, don't be down. Some of us are working on getting **** done. It just takes time.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 09:27 AM
  #177  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by ralliartist
just quit responding back and forth like that, ruining what could be potentially a pretty good thread.
this may happen in a few years, but even then it's still a toss up if it's even worth it. by then, this thread will be in the archive, so someone needs to keep it entertaining while it's here.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 10:11 AM
  #178  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I doubt it will take a few years. There seems to be a push for it now. I bet if a 1.6L blower that was guaranteed to break 400whp on a stock longblock was released as a $2k bolt-on, it would sell big.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 10:21 AM
  #179  
csementuh's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-20-07
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
From: Jeannette, PA
Originally Posted by ralliartist
I doubt it will take a few years. There seems to be a push for it now. I bet if a 1.6L blower that was guaranteed to break 400whp on a stock longblock was released as a $2k bolt-on, it would sell big.
I'd ditch my TVS and jump on it...
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 10:24 AM
  #180  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
you're not getting 400whp bolt on supercharger for $2000. just being realistic

unless of course you can get a magical supercharger with 100% efficiency and 0 parasitic loss lol
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 10:30 AM
  #181  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I'm not saying it's going to happen. I'm just saying that if a blower came out that could break 400whp for $2k, then a lot of people would jump on it.

I'm not trying to be unrealistic either. It's really just the right blower hasn't been made yet. Something that moves alot of air, but not soo much air that it heat stacks.

It may take porting the head no matter what, but if there is a way to avoid that, it would be great.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #182  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by ralliartist
I'm not saying it's going to happen. I'm just saying that if a blower came out that could break 400whp for $2k, then a lot of people would jump on it.

I'm not trying to be unrealistic either. It's really just the right blower hasn't been made yet. Something that moves alot of air, but not soo much air that it heat stacks.

It may take porting the head no matter what, but if there is a way to avoid that, it would be great.
Ignore the close minded people on this site man.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #183  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
i'm not close minded, i'm being realistic. you are not going to physically double the power output on this car by bolting on a supercharger. that's near a 100% increase. if there was such a magical supercharger that neared 100% efficiency, it would make that company the #1 supercharger manufacturer in the world

now if you said that you were looking for a $2000 kit + $3000 worth of mods, then yes i would say that's definitely possible, but you could do more for $2000 less with a turbo

@ ralli, it's not necessarily an issue with heat, it's that it takes alot of power to operate a supercharger. to get 400whp out of a supercharger would mean that it would need to surpass the efficiency of a turbo with the parasitic loss calculated in, and that's simply not going to happen.

why not work with people like area on this and figure out ways to maximize what is already out there instead of just starting new ones? i could only imagine what he could do if he had the financial backing of what is being spent trying to create new systems, and when those new systems come out, you'll be years behind the power curve on the pieces that have already been on the market.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 11:43 AM
  #184  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
i'm not close minded, i'm being realistic. you are not going to physically double the power output on this car by bolting on a supercharger. that's near a 100% increase. if there was such a magical supercharger that neared 100% efficiency, it would make that company the #1 supercharger manufacturer in the world

now if you said that you were looking for a $2000 kit + $3000 worth of mods, then yes i would say that's definitely possible, but you could do more for $2000 less with a turbo

@ ralli, it's not necessarily an issue with heat, it's that it takes alot of power to operate a supercharger. to get 400whp out of a supercharger would mean that it would need to surpass the efficiency of a turbo with the parasitic loss calculated in, and that's simply not going to happen.

why not work with people like area on this and figure out ways to maximize what is already out there instead of just starting new ones? i could only imagine what he could do if he had the financial backing of what is being spent trying to create new systems, and when those new systems come out, you'll be years behind the power curve on the pieces that have already been on the market.
I must say this is one of your better posts and suggestions, and it doesnt even involve sarcasim

I feel you have come up with a damn good idea, but Area is so secretive with his knowledge on these cars. I'm sure he is pushing, or is already at 400 whp with one of his "kill" tunes, but he never discloses information on them. It would be cool to see what he could really do with some added funds, and put it to good use to benefit the Cobalt community.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 12:44 PM
  #185  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
he doesn't post about it because there's no one on here he needs to impress, and also, why would he spend his own time and money developing something, only to be stolen by a company so they can profit from his work?

i don't blame or question him even for a split second.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 12:46 PM
  #186  
MP Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-02-07
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 0
From: MP, PA (S of Pittsburgh)
yeah the thing is the tvs was made/ based off of a v6. only blower for our cars that are like made for then are the m62 but from the factory it's basically maxed out
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 12:59 PM
  #187  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
he doesn't post about it because there's no one on here he needs to impress, and also, why would he spend his own time and money developing something, only to be stolen by a company so they can profit from his work?

i don't blame or question him even for a split second.
I'm not looking to be impressed by him or his car.

I'm also not looking for his secrets in tuning either. I could care less.

I just think it would be cool to see what he could do with his car if added funds were given to him. That is all. I never said anything about his own money being used.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #188  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I'm not backing any of this with my money either. I'm meerly suggesting it to people that are wanting to get into the market (like Kevin McMillan).

I really don't think the blower is going to have to be 100% efficient to make that much power. Turbo swaps have already produced over 400whp, why can't a blower do the same? It doesn't take 3,000 dollars to get the bolt ons and supporting mods for a bigger blower. The same amount of money it takes a turbo car to upgrade all of their bolt ons and supporting mods is about the same price for a blower car. The difference is there is a huge selection of turbos and not very many aftermarket blowers that just bolt on.

Time will tell. Bryan will step in when he feels he needs to. I've seen him almost take the plunge on some products and back out when he felt that product was going south. I've also seen him grab up a product and put out lots of info for everyone to use. I'm sure he'll jump on this if it seems like the right deal.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 03:17 PM
  #189  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Update from Kevin. He was talking some business deals with Magnuson and brought up the idea of a 1.6ltr blower. They said that there is in face a TVS 1600 that will be shown at SEMA this year. November time frame maybe. So it is possible that at some point next year we could see a 1600 go into production. It just depends on what car it gets produced on. He said there's a huge push for F/I cars in Brazil right now since they have restrictions on engine size and that's the big market for blowers right now. It's a lot like Germany, they tax on engine size as well.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 03:47 PM
  #190  
the_cobalt_kid's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-17-10
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Stationed in NY, From Ok
sooo there is PROBABLY going to be a 1.6L twinscrew and we won't get to use it? LMAO
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #191  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Not a twinscrew. Another TVS blower. But you might possibly get to use it because they will possibly make new cases or adapter plates that bolt on. Right now it's still too early to tell.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 06:12 PM
  #192  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by ralliartist
Not a twinscrew. Another TVS blower. But you might possibly get to use it because they will possibly make new cases or adapter plates that bolt on. Right now it's still too early to tell.
so were just gonna get the TVS1650?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2010 | 09:16 PM
  #193  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by ralliartist

I really don't think the blower is going to have to be 100% efficient to make that much power. Turbo swaps have already produced over 400whp, why can't a blower do the same?
oh it can, you're just going to need to find a blower that will bolt on and produce 450whp, cause it's gonna take at least 50hp to turn a blower to make that much power. then you will have 400whp unless you have one with better efficiency that a turbo lol
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 12:59 AM
  #194  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
so were just gonna get the TVS1650?
possibly. Nothing in stone yet.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 09:34 AM
  #195  
Greased's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-09-07
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
oh it can, you're just going to need to find a blower that will bolt on and produce 450whp, cause it's gonna take at least 50hp to turn a blower to make that much power. then you will have 400whp unless you have one with better efficiency that a turbo lol
simple solution, make your car double supercharged to cover the parasitic losses of the first blower.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2010 | 10:57 AM
  #196  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by Greased
simple solution, make your car double supercharged to cover the parasitic losses of the first blower.
GENIOUS!!!!!!!

problem resolved /thread


but wait... wouldn't that mean it's a compound 3.2 liter blower and we need to make a new thread asking about it?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2010 | 12:24 PM
  #197  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
What about a 1.45L roots blower that can be found at any junk yard for $300?

I know its been tried before with simular results to the TVS on premium fuel. But what would b possible with E85 or method injection?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 07:26 AM
  #198  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I dunno, try it out.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 07:49 AM
  #199  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
ooooohhhhh, how about a leaf blower in the intake? that will cancel out parasetic loss
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2010 | 09:18 AM
  #200  
csementuh's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-20-07
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
From: Jeannette, PA
Originally Posted by ebristol
What about a 1.45L roots blower that can be found at any junk yard for $300?

I know its been tried before with simular results to the TVS on premium fuel. But what would b possible with E85 or method injection?
What blower off which car?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 PM.