2.0 Stage 2+ = 283hp?
Did anyone see this article?
GMTunersource
Aside from the Cobalt winning the Time Attack with the second fastest time ever
I thought this was quite interesting...
I believe the '+' in Stage 2+ is the nitrous setup.
According to other press releases Stage 2 is supposed to be 241hp.
If you take 241hp / 283hp * 100 you get 85.15% which looks to me like a 14.85% drive train loss.
I'm going to go ahead and start believing that Stage 2 is going to give us 283hp at the crank... SWEET.
Also looks like our rev limiter will be raised to 6840 not 7000 as some have speculated.
GMTunersource
Aside from the Cobalt winning the Time Attack with the second fastest time ever
I thought this was quite interesting...
The engine features an Eaton M-62 Gen 5 Hybrid supercharger, and delivers 283 horsepower at 6840 rpm and 243 lb.-ft. of torque at 4200 rpm without the nitrous. It is also Stage 2+ equipped, using a smaller pulley than the Stage 2 kit available soon through GM Performance Parts to achieve even greater torque.
According to other press releases Stage 2 is supposed to be 241hp.
If you take 241hp / 283hp * 100 you get 85.15% which looks to me like a 14.85% drive train loss.
I'm going to go ahead and start believing that Stage 2 is going to give us 283hp at the crank... SWEET.
Also looks like our rev limiter will be raised to 6840 not 7000 as some have speculated.
article in S3 magazine said 6700 red line
1 of the guys from GM , that was part of the time attack car told me that they were not raising the redline on the stage kits
even thought the grand am cup cars redline at 7000
1 of the guys from GM , that was part of the time attack car told me that they were not raising the redline on the stage kits
even thought the grand am cup cars redline at 7000
I'm going to keep my fingers crossed and hope that M62 Hybrid means "Stock M62 with smaller pulley".
I think the numbers make sense. GM is saying 241hp, if that's at the wheels then a realistic drivetrain loss of 14-15% would put us at 283hp crank.
I think the numbers make sense. GM is saying 241hp, if that's at the wheels then a realistic drivetrain loss of 14-15% would put us at 283hp crank.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:51 PM



