2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

2.0 Stage 2+ = 283hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:45 AM
  #1  
ballerSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 10-07-05
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Question 2.0 Stage 2+ = 283hp?

Did anyone see this article?

GMTunersource

Aside from the Cobalt winning the Time Attack with the second fastest time ever
I thought this was quite interesting...

The engine features an Eaton M-62 Gen 5 Hybrid supercharger, and delivers 283 horsepower at 6840 rpm and 243 lb.-ft. of torque at 4200 rpm without the nitrous. It is also Stage 2+ equipped, using a smaller pulley than the Stage 2 kit available soon through GM Performance Parts to achieve even greater torque.
I believe the '+' in Stage 2+ is the nitrous setup.

According to other press releases Stage 2 is supposed to be 241hp.

If you take 241hp / 283hp * 100 you get 85.15% which looks to me like a 14.85% drive train loss.

I'm going to go ahead and start believing that Stage 2 is going to give us 283hp at the crank... SWEET.

Also looks like our rev limiter will be raised to 6840 not 7000 as some have speculated.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #2  
Chevypowered's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-05-05
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
WE discussed this already its not nitrous we guessed that it was a hybrid M62 S/C as it says in the discription. w/ nitrous it bumped it up to above 300
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
97cavie24ls's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-05
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: phoenix , az
article in S3 magazine said 6700 red line

1 of the guys from GM , that was part of the time attack car told me that they were not raising the redline on the stage kits


even thought the grand am cup cars redline at 7000
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:56 AM
  #4  
ballerSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 10-07-05
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I'm going to keep my fingers crossed and hope that M62 Hybrid means "Stock M62 with smaller pulley".

I think the numbers make sense. GM is saying 241hp, if that's at the wheels then a realistic drivetrain loss of 14-15% would put us at 283hp crank.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 11:09 AM
  #5  
Mikecobalt's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-16-05
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: chicoutimi, québec
The article also said that they were using a smaller pulley than the stage 2 kit, But i really like the number of the raceattack, really surprise they beat the evo... by that much time
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
HEATON
Parts
12
Oct 16, 2015 07:21 PM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:51 PM
grampss
Complete Cars
0
Sep 27, 2015 08:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.