2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

2,000 dollars later...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 01:11 AM
  #76  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
you're missing my point. yes. where he stands right now, it would be cheaper to go with a tvs instead of spending 4.5k on a turbo kit. but had he not spent all the money trying to mod the m62 in the first place and just went right with a turbo. this thread would be about why he only hit 399 and not 400. instead, he's at 255.
So you're blaming him being 255 on the m62? I would say something else is wrong with his car and he should be alot higher then 255, and as blue pointed out also you can upgrade a piece at a time and work you're way to a a TVS build, what you're saying is buy a stock car then drop another 4.5k to turbo it, why not just buy a damn LNF to start with then, by the time you add the cost of a stock car and the complete turbo swap u could have just got an LNF. So like I said the tvs is the cheaper route, Im not saying is best or anything, but it will make great power.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 01:22 AM
  #77  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
cause you can buy an lsj for about 8k if you search. 12.5k for a 450whp car. yes please.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 04:47 AM
  #78  
RooTBeeR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-18-07
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
<smart guy...bone stock untouched m62 setup straight to tvs
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 07:47 AM
  #79  
05Slowline's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-03-10
Posts: 6,918
Likes: 0
From: HBG/Hanover
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
cause you can buy an lsj for about 8k if you search. 12.5k for a 450whp car. yes please.
Not to mention lsj>lnf
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:07 AM
  #80  
klloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-15-11
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, ME
I have given up on my stock supercharger, hopefully this summer i will be doing a turbo swap. I have a 2.8, dual pass, s3 heat exchanger, header, catted d/p, 75% meth, zzp intake, option b, phenolic spacer and the stock exhaust with a magnaflow muffler with a byt tune and I only put down 276hp & 256 tq. There are a few other things I can do but throwing another $1k isn't gunna get me to 300whp so I'm saving and gunna turbo so I can get to 400+!!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:28 AM
  #81  
Joe Schulte's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 06-17-09
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Did 250whp on my LSJ with $600 into it, using the GMS2 3.06" pulley/stock exhaust. Never dyno'd with 2.9 and additional mods.

Then I went LNF, sunk a bit more in but also achieved what I was seeking. Looking back I'd been wise to keep my SS/SC and turbo swap it, but meh, 5 doors of fun isn't bad either.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:31 AM
  #82  
nismopowerdqg's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-27-11
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
i made better numbers than that with my 2.9" pulley hahah WASTE O' MONAYYYY
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 11:28 AM
  #83  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
cause you can buy an lsj for about 8k if you search. 12.5k for a 450whp car. yes please.
pushing 450 on stock internals? sounds like a solid plan lol.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 11:38 AM
  #84  
klloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 01-15-11
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
From: Brunswick, ME
The internals are good for between 450/500 aren't they? Either way its turbo so you can turn down the boost if you want.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 11:41 AM
  #85  
ULWizSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-30-10
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Florence, NJ
Originally Posted by klloyd
The internals are good for between 450/500 aren't they? Either way its turbo so you can turn down the boost if you want.
Yeah i was always told around 450 is the max you want to be on stock internals.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 11:46 AM
  #86  
startingline05's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-14-07
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 1
From: Hinesville ga
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
pushing 450 on stock internals? sounds like a solid plan lol.
very solid plan
say thank you to e-85 and zzp to make that easy and possible
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:52 PM
  #87  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Some people like Superchargers, some people like turbos. Who cares?

Everyone knows you need to raise the octane value of the fuel to make big power with a blower. If you can't run 23-25* peak timing on any SC'd LSJ the car will be a turd. Plain and simple.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 02:07 PM
  #88  
07MetallicSC's Avatar
Super Moderator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 09-29-06
Posts: 20,664
Likes: 217
From: Land of Freedom
Originally Posted by ebristol
Some people like Superchargers, some people like turbos. Who cares?
honestly. ^this ^
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 02:20 PM
  #89  
Vander Nars's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 3,994
Likes: 3
From: Augusta GA
Originally Posted by 07MetallicSC
honestly. ^this ^
that was the whole point until EXsoccer felt the need to start bashing the TVS like its not a viable option.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 02:22 PM
  #90  
Gremlin85's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 08-01-09
Posts: 9,998
Likes: 2
From: Wheh ah we? MA.
Originally Posted by zfissette
Ive attached a dyno sheet as the beginning of this thread, take a look at it and hopefully it works.

So, i want to get my 07 cobalt ready for a TVS. thats been my goal all along. So first thing this morning, zzp 3" cai, stock tb, 2.8" pulley, dual pass, option b, zzp stg 3 he,zzp phenolic spacer, 80# injectors, zzp long tube header with catted dp, 2.5" gmpp performance exhaust, custom gremlin85 tune. car puts down 248/251. At this point we swap out the stock blower and intake manifold for a ported and polished m62 with a 2.6" pulley and a ported single pass intake manifold. after retuning and several dyno pulls she has gained 7 horse and lost 6 foot pounds of torque. we tried advancing the timing only to gain 1 hp per point and decided to dial it back to the last point when we made measurable gains. now running about 19 degrees of timing and an excellent a/f ratio. had timing up to 21 with no gains. with the exception of trading the stock h/e for a griffin ive now done every cooling mod short of active intercooling. iat2 temps we only a few degrees above ambient and returned to that point instantly after letting off the throttle. there is nothing more to be gained on the intercooling side. boost before todays mods topped out at 16 or so, after mods, confidently rises to 18.

so, long story short, 2,000 dollars, 6 weeks turnaround on the parts, no butt dyno change, idle is slightly deteriorated. a bit irritated about that actually. for having 80# injectors her idle was excellent yesterday, today its a bit lumpy, otherwise runs excellent. Sounded excellent on the dyno, pulled confidently, no belt or clutch slip. tc rims and tires gripped the dyno without difficulty. Merges onto the highway like its being shot out of a catapult. destroys the tires in first and second gear.

debating the next step. also had a ls4tb and adapter plate ported and polished, going to order a new zpp 3" cai so they can be bolted up and tuned. considering getting the catless dp from zzp. looking for thoughts from the brotherhood. My gut says shes not making what she could. considering a full zzp 3" exhaust, fred at smg says its not needed for anything under 300hp. looking at meth for the spring, already bought a second head to have ported and polished and to in theory get cams for.
Damn Zack, I thought she would have made more. Felt strong when we were dialing in the timing that night.

I would have been more than happy to take a look at it for you if you were at all disappointed with the tune. I know I still had some work to get the AFR and trims perfectly spot on but after you swapped the supercharger and whatnot and picked up such small gains, I feel that something might be wrong elsewhere.

Let me know if I or James can help you.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 03:23 PM
  #91  
Leafydialupking's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-29-10
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: NH
This sounds like it could be 4 things, starting with the worse case.
Cylinder that is starting be be weak (compression in the 140 range)
Slipping clutch
Poorly tuned spark table (tune to knock limit and/or mbt in all cells on dyno, then see what the car feels like )
Too much fuel
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 03:39 PM
  #92  
startingline05's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-14-07
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 1
From: Hinesville ga
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
that was the whole point until EXsoccer felt the need to start bashing the TVS like its not a viable option.
It really isnt.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 03:48 PM
  #93  
zfissette's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-10-11
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
the a/f ratio is visible in the dyno sheet, it was dead on at about 11.8-1. there is no power balance issue or misfire that would indicate a cylinder that was weak. excellent oil color and smell, excellent exhaust smell, no sign of anything going on with the motor. clutch is possible, its something i should do as her power level climbs. Gremlin your tune was excellent. id very much like to get you back in the copilot seat for a second opinion and to get her logs into circulation to see if theres anything out of place. Her first pull was on your tune and her af was excellent and made exactly the right amount of power for her mods in my opinion. its the after parts install number that bothers me and fred. with a ported and polished blower running a smaller pulley and a ported single pass manifold i was hoping to pick up between 20 and 30 hp. single digit gains bother me when shes picked up 2 pounds of boost.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 03:51 PM
  #94  
zfissette's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-10-11
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
so basically Gremlin, dinners on me and im happy to pay the completely fair price you charge to tune my girl
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #95  
Gremlin85's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 08-01-09
Posts: 9,998
Likes: 2
From: Wheh ah we? MA.
No dinner or money necessary lol.

I actually have a few bottles of the Lucas Octane Booster if you want them (free).

I'll PM you.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 04:04 PM
  #96  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
Originally Posted by Vander Nars
that was the whole point until EXsoccer felt the need to start bashing the TVS like its not a viable option.
people putting words in my mouth again i suppose...

i was never bashing it. you said that you will make 300-350whp easy with the tvs. i simply said or go turbo for the same price and make ATLEAST 400whp easy.

Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Dec 29, 2011 at 04:35 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 04:09 PM
  #97  
carstedt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-17-10
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: ft. lewis/ milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by ebristol
Some people like Superchargers, some people like turbos. Who cares?
^ this exactly if only every1 thought this way instead of cluttering up threads arguing about it
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 04:09 PM
  #98  
zfissette's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-10-11
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
my car will have her tvs at some point, there is no doubt. its been the plan since before i bought the car. only thing im debating at this point is wether or not to have my spare head ported, polished, sprung and cammed first. then the next question is meth before or after the tvs.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 04:12 PM
  #99  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
yes to the head, yes to the meth. unless you tapped the intake manifold for the meth nozzle iirc the only option is with a tb spacer or run it in the intake. i wouldn't do the intake cause when it hits the blade it will deflect and have the possibility of pooling up. with the blower spacer i don't know if theres enough room with how close the tvs already is to everything.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 04:20 PM
  #100  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
I would go pre blower with a tb spacer. Keeps the charger cool and bumps up boost a little.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 PM.