2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

2.5 or 3 inch downpipe with 2.5 catback?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 01:42 PM
  #1  
06cobalt racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-16-08
Posts: 3,520
Likes: 3
From: Altus AFB, Ok
2.5 or 3 inch downpipe with 2.5 catback?

i have 2 choices.

1. 3 inch catless downpipe with a 3 inch exit bolted to a 2.5 magnaflow cat back.--thats whats on it currently but with the stock cat back. magnaflow cat back is in the mail.

2. i have a extra downpipe laying around. it is a 2.5 inch catted downpipe with 2.5 exit.
with that one the transitition from downpipe to cat back will be better since there wont be a "wall" for the air to hit. (like there will be from a 3 inch exit to a 2.5 inlet)

i am leaning towards option 2 but wanted to see what you guys think.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 01:56 PM
  #2  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Do not put a 2.5" downpipe on the lsj. Go with the 3" downpipe.

The stock catbacks inlet is only 2 1/16". I'm suprised you havent had any exhaust leaks running a 3" exit downpipe to the stock catback.

Last edited by Staged07SS; Oct 13, 2010 at 02:26 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 06:25 PM
  #3  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
Do not put a 2.5" downpipe on the lsj. Go with the 3" downpipe.

The stock catbacks inlet is only 2 1/16". I'm suprised you havent had any exhaust leaks running a 3" exit downpipe to the stock catback.
X2. Go 3" DP for sure
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 08:10 PM
  #4  
impalaboy327's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-31-08
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
I have 2.5 inch downpipe, seems to work fine for me.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #5  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by impalaboy327
I have 2.5 inch downpipe, seems to work fine for me.
The stock downpipe for the most part is 2.785" O.D.

Yes, your 2.5" has "some" flow improvments over the production downpipe, but once you start flowing more air (pulley down) you will want a larger downpipe. A 2.5" downpipe works better as an upgrade on the LE5's & L61's.

I have gone over this with GM Engineers, and they claim its best to use a 2.75"-3.00" downpipe on the LSJ.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 10:48 PM
  #6  
Frew's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 05-17-08
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
if your gonna stay on a modest sized pulley, go 2.5. If your going for max flow and planning on seriously gonna pulley down go 3". There is actually a calculation you can do that takes airflow through the maf in lbs and displacement and calculates what size exhaust you need for peak flow. Mine obviously was 3" lol.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:54 AM
  #7  
06cobalt racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-16-08
Posts: 3,520
Likes: 3
From: Altus AFB, Ok
where is this calculation at? right now i have a ottp stage 2 cai zzpheader then cooling mods
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:55 AM
  #8  
06cobalt racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-16-08
Posts: 3,520
Likes: 3
From: Altus AFB, Ok
even with the dp being a 3 inch exit it will be better using that with the 2.5 catback?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 07:06 AM
  #9  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by 06cobalt racer
even with the dp being a 3 inch exit it will be better using that with the 2.5 catback?
Not really.

You want to match the exit of your downpipe with the inlet of the catback.

3" into 2.5" is not going to flow any better. Infact it will be a slight restriction. You will have all that flow coming from the 3" downpipe, and it will be slowed down when it hits the opening of the catback. This will cause eddies and inturn restrict the flow slightly.

Last edited by Staged07SS; Oct 14, 2010 at 01:57 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #10  
06cobalt racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-16-08
Posts: 3,520
Likes: 3
From: Altus AFB, Ok
can i order a 3 to 2.5 flange somewhere? since i already have the 3 inch downpipe?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:20 PM
  #11  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by 06cobalt racer
can i order a 3 to 2.5 flange somewhere? since i already have the 3 inch downpipe?
You could prob just take it to a local exhaust shop, and have them make you one. It prob wont cost that much, and would be cheaper than buying a new downpipe.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 01:50 PM
  #12  
csementuh's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-20-07
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
From: Jeannette, PA
Originally Posted by Frew
if your gonna stay on a modest sized pulley, go 2.5. If your going for max flow and planning on seriously gonna pulley down go 3". There is actually a calculation you can do that takes airflow through the maf in lbs and displacement and calculates what size exhaust you need for peak flow. Mine obviously was 3" lol.
Airflow through the MAF is not a good indication of much of anything... The number will change dramatically based upon the size of the intake piping the MAF is in... Some people think that 100whp per 10lbs of air is another calculation, which in fact is wrong again. You can persuade your number high or low with different intakes and tuning. In order to use your calculation you would need the actual airflow of the engine, not simply the skewed MAF airflow value.

To the OP, 3" DP with 2.5" catback is the sweet spot. As exhaust gasses cool they lost velocity, so the 2.5" catback is fine until you start making lots of power.

Also various places make a 3" dp to 2.5" flange (bolt to 3" dp, cut off 2.5" flange and use slip fit). Clear Image Autp gave me one when I first had their exhaust, and also I believe Vibrant makes one.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 02:37 PM
  #13  
Frew's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 05-17-08
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by csementuh
Airflow through the MAF is not a good indication of much of anything... The number will change dramatically based upon the size of the intake piping the MAF is in... Some people think that 100whp per 10lbs of air is another calculation, which in fact is wrong again. You can persuade your number high or low with different intakes and tuning. In order to use your calculation you would need the actual airflow of the engine, not simply the skewed MAF airflow value.

To the OP, 3" DP with 2.5" catback is the sweet spot. As exhaust gasses cool they lost velocity, so the 2.5" catback is fine until you start making lots of power.

Also various places make a 3" dp to 2.5" flange (bolt to 3" dp, cut off 2.5" flange and use slip fit). Clear Image Autp gave me one when I first had their exhaust, and also I believe Vibrant makes one.
^^^ this is one man opinion, just cause you say something is wrong infact does not make it wrong, you right cause my intake piping in 2.654678899765" ohno! My exhaust setup is skewed forever, what shall I do? I didn't say it mas a mathmatical be all end all, just that it would put you in the general area of what size exhaust you need
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:07 PM
  #14  
383_Stroker's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 02-25-08
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Murray, KY
Call me crazy, but here's my experience with downpipes..

I had ported stock manifold, 2.5" dp w/ cat, gmpp catback.. was able to pull 25* of timing w/ methanol..

I then got a shorty header w/3" collector and matching dp that necked down to a 2.5" exit.. similar timing..

Header cracked, went back to manifold still using 3" downpipe.. Suddenly I was knocking all over the place and only able to command a max of 22*, with everything else the same.. I'm assuming turbulence = crappy flow = more heat = knock

Now its a pacesetter and 3" all the way back and i'm able to put my timing back up to 25*...

So, based on that.. I think hitting the 2.5" wall with a 3" pipe is a very bad idea.. I'd go straight 2.5 before doing that.. but if you can get a 3" to 2.5" flange, then thats fine too.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 03:31 PM
  #15  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by 383_Stroker
Call me crazy, but here's my experience with downpipes..

I had ported stock manifold, 2.5" dp w/ cat, gmpp catback.. was able to pull 25* of timing w/ methanol..

I then got a shorty header w/3" collector and matching dp that necked down to a 2.5" exit.. similar timing..

Header cracked, went back to manifold still using 3" downpipe.. Suddenly I was knocking all over the place and only able to command a max of 22*, with everything else the same.. I'm assuming turbulence = crappy flow = more heat = knock

Now its a pacesetter and 3" all the way back and i'm able to put my timing back up to 25*...

So, based on that.. I think hitting the 2.5" wall with a 3" pipe is a very bad idea.. I'd go straight 2.5 before doing that.. but if you can get a 3" to 2.5" flange, then thats fine too.
Yep, thats what i said. It will def cause issues with the exhaust flow.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 08:58 AM
  #16  
06cobalt racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-16-08
Posts: 3,520
Likes: 3
From: Altus AFB, Ok
ok. cool thanks guys. time to call around
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 11:46 AM
  #17  
csementuh's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-20-07
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
From: Jeannette, PA
Originally Posted by Frew
^^^ this is one man opinion, just cause you say something is wrong infact does not make it wrong, you right cause my intake piping in 2.654678899765" ohno! My exhaust setup is skewed forever, what shall I do? I didn't say it mas a mathmatical be all end all, just that it would put you in the general area of what size exhaust you need
If it's not a 'mathmatical be all end all', then why bother mentioning it in the first place, when you could simply use the real world experience gained by many, many people in the 'Cobalt scene' and suggest the correct setup for his mods? Not quite sure why you listed something as a certainty when it is not, then argued that its not a certainty, and in fact would put you in the 'general area of what size exhaust you need'. I only said anything in the first place because your statements about the MAF airflow are not 100% accurate and would probably further confuse the OP.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
hacadacalopolis
Parts
8
Oct 28, 2015 06:09 PM
no_ss
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Oct 18, 2015 11:58 PM
z28addiction
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Sep 28, 2015 12:03 AM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 PM.