Anyone know if the LNF exhaust Mani works on the LSJ?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-01-06
Location: Maidstone, SK
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Platinum Member
Join Date: 03-16-07
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the direct injection is the big thing with the LNF cars and how easy it is to gain more power with just tuning, otherwise I would say the motors are pretty well the same. A cool swap if at all possible would be an LNF cylinder head onto an LSJ with said manifold. Almost an LNF convesion for us LSJ guys
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 04-02-06
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea i dont imagine there would be much difference in results, the LSJ has the higher compression so its going to make higher power, but the LNF has all the VVT wizardry and cam phasing to soup it up
#8
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
I think the direct injection is the big thing with the LNF cars and how easy it is to gain more power with just tuning, otherwise I would say the motors are pretty well the same. A cool swap if at all possible would be an LNF cylinder head onto an LSJ with said manifold. Almost an LNF convesion for us LSJ guys
GM released a DI 2.2 (LAP) version of the 2.2 (L61) and it only gained a little over stock. Now in a full tuned version there would be more gains ofcourse.
LAP 155tq 150hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...Cobalt_LAP.pdf
L61 152tq 148hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...hev_Cobalt.pdf
#9
Platinum Member
Join Date: 03-16-07
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm idk about that.
GM released a DI 2.2 (LAP) version of the 2.2 (L61) and it only gained a little over stock. Now in a full tuned version there would be more gains ofcourse.
LAP 155tq 150hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...Cobalt_LAP.pdf
L61 152tq 148hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...hev_Cobalt.pdf
GM released a DI 2.2 (LAP) version of the 2.2 (L61) and it only gained a little over stock. Now in a full tuned version there would be more gains ofcourse.
LAP 155tq 150hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...Cobalt_LAP.pdf
L61 152tq 148hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...hev_Cobalt.pdf
#11
Moderator Alumni
I think the direct injection is the big thing with the LNF cars and how easy it is to gain more power with just tuning, otherwise I would say the motors are pretty well the same. A cool swap if at all possible would be an LNF cylinder head onto an LSJ with said manifold. Almost an LNF convesion for us LSJ guys
The Turbo and maybe VVT (but I argue thats still emissions related) are what gives the LNF the boost.
Think about it, if the M62 takes ~40-50 HP to drive that right there gives you the extra to put the LSJ into the LNF HP ball park.
#12
Platinum Member
Join Date: 03-16-07
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree that emissions will be better in a DI motor but like you said, it is more efficient. This efficiency will help produce more power when tuned (or with a turbo like the LNF more power stock).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post