2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Anyone know if the LNF exhaust Mani works on the LSJ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 01:03 AM
  #1  
boosthard05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: colorado springs colorado
Anyone know if the LNF exhaust Mani works on the LSJ?

so.....???
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 01:04 AM
  #2  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
It should bolt up, I am pretty sure the flanges are the same.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #3  
brandondrecksage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-06-07
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
why? A couple of sponsers already sell a turbo exhaust manifold.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #4  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
Well I guess you could put the LNF turbo on the LSJ, that would be the only reason for doing so that I can think of
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #5  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
Well I guess you could put the LNF turbo on the LSJ, that would be the only reason for doing so that I can think of
I'm waiting for someone to do that. Just to prove how 'not different' these motors perform.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:23 AM
  #6  
SKCobalt's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 03-16-07
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
I think the direct injection is the big thing with the LNF cars and how easy it is to gain more power with just tuning, otherwise I would say the motors are pretty well the same. A cool swap if at all possible would be an LNF cylinder head onto an LSJ with said manifold. Almost an LNF convesion for us LSJ guys
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #7  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
yea i dont imagine there would be much difference in results, the LSJ has the higher compression so its going to make higher power, but the LNF has all the VVT wizardry and cam phasing to soup it up
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:41 AM
  #8  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by SKCobalt
I think the direct injection is the big thing with the LNF cars and how easy it is to gain more power with just tuning, otherwise I would say the motors are pretty well the same. A cool swap if at all possible would be an LNF cylinder head onto an LSJ with said manifold. Almost an LNF convesion for us LSJ guys
Hmm idk about that.

GM released a DI 2.2 (LAP) version of the 2.2 (L61) and it only gained a little over stock. Now in a full tuned version there would be more gains ofcourse.

LAP 155tq 150hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...Cobalt_LAP.pdf

L61 152tq 148hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...hev_Cobalt.pdf
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #9  
SKCobalt's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 03-16-07
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Originally Posted by ebristol
Hmm idk about that.

GM released a DI 2.2 (LAP) version of the 2.2 (L61) and it only gained a little over stock. Now in a full tuned version there would be more gains ofcourse.

LAP 155tq 150hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...Cobalt_LAP.pdf

L61 152tq 148hp
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...hev_Cobalt.pdf
I think while the gains on a N/A will be smaller with DI, I think they would be much higher with a boosted motor (whether it be S/C or T/C), but who knows... I do not know a ton about our motors.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #10  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by SKCobalt
I think while the gains on a N/A will be smaller with DI, I think they would be much higher with a boosted motor (whether it be S/C or T/C), but who knows... I do not know a ton about our motors.
That is probably true.

An other problem with slapping an LNF head on an LSJ is controlling the VVT. With the ECU from the LSJ there is no way to control it through HPTs.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:52 AM
  #11  
zinner's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: 08-26-04
Posts: 4,944
Likes: 2
From: RTP, NC
Originally Posted by SKCobalt
I think the direct injection is the big thing with the LNF cars and how easy it is to gain more power with just tuning, otherwise I would say the motors are pretty well the same. A cool swap if at all possible would be an LNF cylinder head onto an LSJ with said manifold. Almost an LNF convesion for us LSJ guys
Direct injection's main purpose is emissions. Yes it's more efficient, but it's main purpose is emissions IMO.

The Turbo and maybe VVT (but I argue thats still emissions related) are what gives the LNF the boost.

Think about it, if the M62 takes ~40-50 HP to drive that right there gives you the extra to put the LSJ into the LNF HP ball park.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #12  
SKCobalt's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 03-16-07
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
I agree that emissions will be better in a DI motor but like you said, it is more efficient. This efficiency will help produce more power when tuned (or with a turbo like the LNF more power stock).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbo Johnny
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Feb 21, 2019 09:41 AM
hhrfreek
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
51
Jun 4, 2016 11:25 PM
Supercharged06SS
Parts
20
Oct 5, 2015 09:13 PM
The Rookie24
War Stories
14
Sep 14, 2015 07:03 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 AM.