B&M or Hurst?
Originally Posted by VictoryRed06
wait for the hurst its well worth it...believe me its worth waiting for
its alot shorter...i was talking about this same subject on another thread...i have a friend jeff who races his cobalts for autox, he said when they put in the b&m sts in, he said there wasnt much of a diff, so i went in the car and checked it out...i mean its shorter but only by like 15% at most, the hurst is giving you 28% less throw between gears.
Originally Posted by VictoryRed06
its alot shorter...i was talking about this same subject on another thread...i have a friend jeff who races his cobalts for autox, he said when they put in the b&m sts in, he said there wasnt much of a diff, so i went in the car and checked it out...i mean its shorter but only by like 15% at most, the hurst is giving you 28% less throw between gears.
Originally Posted by BlackSS05
yes but if you are looking for shorter throws get the b&m in your css. If you want the mor reputable name in shifters go with hurst. i have my b&m and love it.
Originally Posted by Cynic/Torque Forward
I think we need to bring up the fact that my summit order for the Hurst just got refunded so i'm not even sure these will be out. Or is someone carrying them currently? Anyone know?
Of the 4 places I have talked to they are taking pre orders but have no definete release date as of yet.
Is it true that you have to pull up the reverse lock-out to go into 5th with the b&m?
I'm going to wait for the Hurst to come out. Then do the research to see what's better. VictoryRed06, how did your friend get one already? By the sound of what you are saying, I will go with the Hurst, however, I still need to hear it from a few more people first.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



