2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Bought A TVS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 08:32 PM
  #26  
Jaredssbalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-20-10
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Northern Michigan
How much of a difference would a 2.6 pulley make? Anyone know?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 09:03 PM
  #27  
MarqueDo7BabyBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-04-08
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
From: Mo Val, CA
dam..very nice!
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 09:07 PM
  #28  
CobaltSS 16's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 07-01-07
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 29
From: NJ
Awesome, I will be picking up a TVS eventually.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 09:30 PM
  #29  
carstedt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-17-10
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: ft. lewis/ milwaukee, WI
a 2.6 ull feel the difference wont be lik omg but ull notice it....add E and water meth and then ull def notice it
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 12:52 PM
  #30  
Boxxy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-01-11
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Texas
What size Pulley do you have? Or does that matter with the TVS?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 01:23 PM
  #31  
TStone's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-21-11
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 7
From: Dayton, Ohio
Originally Posted by Boxxy
What size Pulley do you have? Or does that matter with the TVS?
He's on a 2.8... and of course, lol pulley size always matters..
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 01:45 PM
  #32  
tylerjclance's Avatar
USA Y U NO HAVE AUTOBAHN?
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 08-24-10
Posts: 12,841
Likes: 2
From: Warren, IN
I have meth, need a tvs
need need need
2.7 or 2.6... that is the question..
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 01:47 PM
  #33  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Originally Posted by Jaredssbalt
Well I finally bought a TVS. Mods are badmab header, catted 3" zzp down pipe, custom 2.5" cat back, zzp 3" CAI, 60's, zzp s3 heat exchanger, pretty much just full bolt ons. With my M62 on a 2.7 I made 256whp. TVS with a 2.8 I made 321whp 277wtq. Turbo Tim at ZZP did an awesome job tuning my car, ZZP FTW.
Could we see a better quality picture please?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 01:49 PM
  #34  
Jaredssbalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-20-10
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Originally Posted by Jmc007
Could we see a better quality picture please?
Ill try to get a better one posted up soon, hopefully tonight.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 02:24 PM
  #35  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
once i dial in my tvs with the 2.7 and 10gph nozzle ill post results. Im more wanting to see my drag times though with slips screw a dyno imo
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 12:55 AM
  #36  
lxl_Th3_On3_lxl's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-13-11
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Az
Originally Posted by Jaredssbalt
Well I finally bought a TVS. Mods are badmab header, catted 3" zzp down pipe, custom 2.5" cat back, zzp 3" CAI, 60's, zzp s3 heat exchanger, pretty much just full bolt ons. With my M62 on a 2.7 I made 256whp. TVS with a 2.8 I made 321whp 277wtq. Turbo Tim at ZZP did an awesome job tuning my car, ZZP FTW.
321 damn that's good. Zoomer from zzp said that 290 whp was max on a tvs
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 05:19 PM
  #37  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Now if you get rid of the 2.5" catback and swap it for a 3" catback, you should see a 12-15 WHP improvement at this HP level, which would bring you at 335WHP (probably about 400BHP when factored from this dyno).
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:04 PM
  #38  
Jaredssbalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-20-10
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Originally Posted by Jmc007
Now if you get rid of the 2.5" catback and swap it for a 3" catback, you should see a 12-15 WHP improvement at this HP level, which would bring you at 335WHP (probably about 400BHP when factored from this dyno).
I hope so. I wanna get 3" exhaust, meth, and 2.6" pulley soon.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:10 PM
  #39  
sjc0013's Avatar
Window Licker
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 03-19-09
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 2
From: Baltimore, MD
damn, great numbers, makes me really wanna get mine dyno'd
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 01:24 PM
  #40  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Impressive.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #41  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Originally Posted by Jmc007
Now if you get rid of the 2.5" catback and swap it for a 3" catback, you should see a 12-15 WHP improvement at this HP level, which would bring you at 335WHP (probably about 400BHP when factored from this dyno).
Well it was a Mustang dyno right?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 12:56 PM
  #42  
Jaredssbalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-20-10
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Ya, mustang dyno. I will hopefully have better pic of graph up soon. Took a better pic just no comp to upload on.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 02:44 PM
  #43  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Those are actually very high numbers for the setup you have on a Mustang dyno. Was that on the ZZP dyno? If yes, I believe they have a 6% difference to the Dynojet (to confirm with ZZP guys), which would put you at 335WHP/295WTQ ... just curious as most of the TVS dyno runs I have seen with a similar setup (posted on this site) are waaaaay lower than yours ... except for a few when they got combination of stuff like ported head, MI, fat exhaust, E-85 ...

Would you mind to confirm the following for us:

- Stock TB?
- Phenolic intake spacer?
- Which spark plugs/gap?
- Fuel octane?
- Stock head exhaust ports?
- Rev limiter setting?
- Degrees of ignition timing?
- IAT2 during the pull?
- Commanded AFR?
- Stock returnless fuel system?
- How many PSI of boost?
- ... and where your dyno numbers corrected (SAE)?

Thanks!

Last edited by Jmc007; Oct 27, 2011 at 10:31 PM. Reason: Added question if dyno numbers are corrected + changed assumed percentage for difference to Dynojet.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 03:07 PM
  #44  
carstedt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-17-10
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: ft. lewis/ milwaukee, WI
u wont regret a 2.6 jus get a good solid tune on it...e85 and meth make it alot better
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 04:43 PM
  #45  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by carstedt
u wont regret a 2.6 jus get a good solid tune on it...e85 and meth make it alot better
you dont need meth with e85
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 06:25 PM
  #46  
N1ckateen's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-20-10
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, IN
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
you dont need meth with e85
I believe once u get that small on a pulley if you add meth it will help with the fueling though. either way i'm sure you will still need to go above and beyond 80# injectors though. plus it's still a cooling mod of sorts if you do a mixture.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2011 | 07:18 PM
  #47  
Jaredssbalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-20-10
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Northern Michigan
Originally Posted by Jmc007
Those are actually very high numbers for the setup you have on a Mustang dyno. Was that on the ZZP dyno? If yes, I believe they have a 9% difference to the Dynojet (to confirm with ZZP guys), which would put you at 350WHP/302WTQ ... just curious as most of the TVS dyno runs I have seen with a similar setup (posted on this site) are waaaaay lower than yours ... except for a few when they got combination of stuff like ported head, MI, fat exhaust, E-85 ...

Would you mind to confirm the following for us:

- Stock TB?
- Phenolic intake spacer?
- Which spark plugs/gap?
- Fuel octane?
- Stock head exhaust ports?
- Rev limiter setting?
- Degrees of ignition timing?
- IAT2 during the pull?
- Commanded AFR?
- Stock returnless fuel system?
- How many PSI of boost?
- ... and where your dyno numbers corrected (SAE)?

Thanks!
- Stock TB
- No spacer
- I believe NGK plugs with .34 gap iirc
- 93 octane
- Stock head
- 7200 Red line
- Cant remember how much timing, ill get ahold of tim and find out.
- End of dyno run IAT2's were 140ish, Only cooling mod is ZZP S3 H/E
- Commanded AFR I Cant remember for sure, I wanna say 11.8, but ill ask Tim.
- Stock fuel system, using 60# inj
- 23.7 PSI boost at redline
- Yes numbers were corrected, uncorrected was a little higher but i dont remember the numbers.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 11:58 AM
  #48  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by N1ckateen
I believe once u get that small on a pulley if you add meth it will help with the fueling though. either way i'm sure you will still need to go above and beyond 80# injectors though. plus it's still a cooling mod of sorts if you do a mixture.
AND

it allows you to go around bragging about your IAT2s like people with Meth injection like to do!

Personally, I don't care that IAT2s are lower on Meth injection cars vs E85 cars. I know E85 cars make more hp.

Reply
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #49  
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 1
From: Vine Grove Kentucky
Now add meth and e lol and now u can brag who has the cooler combustion and iat2z
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2011 | 12:11 PM
  #50  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
wow those 60's must be screaming at you
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.