2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

dual heat exchangers. and josh from ott.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 04:20 AM
  #1  
wtpcobaltss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 01-25-08
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: bowling green ky
dual heat exchangers. and josh from ott.

Ok so ive been running just the cx heat exchanger for about 5 months and decided since i got the ott stage 1 on the way that maybe more cooling would be a great idea... so im using both the filler neck runs into the stock then out to the cx then into the pump. will this be ok or would it have been best just to use the cx??? by the way does anyone know josh from ott becausse my cpu messed up and its shows me buying the ott stage 1 3x's i dont need 3 and i need my 1400 dollars.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 04:25 AM
  #2  
Wolf117's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-26-07
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
isnt josh fast98 or something?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 04:26 AM
  #3  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
yes, it will be fine. it is actually prefered that you run the cx inline with the factory h/e

Originally Posted by Wolf117
isnt josh fast98 or something?
yes again

Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Jan 17, 2009 at 04:26 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 06:49 AM
  #4  
qwikredline's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-03-08
Posts: 3,454
Likes: 1
From: Port Perry Ontario
Originally Posted by wtpcobaltss
Ok so ive been running just the cx heat exchanger for about 5 months and decided since i got the ott stage 1 on the way that maybe more cooling would be a great idea... so im using both the filler neck runs into the stock then out to the cx then into the pump. will this be ok or would it have been best just to use the cx??? by the way does anyone know josh from ott becausse my cpu messed up and its shows me buying the ott stage 1 3x's i dont need 3 and i need my 1400 dollars.
talk to Josh he will resolve your issues, and go to Option B dont waste time with the silly stock T filler it really is junque....good luck
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 08:14 AM
  #5  
coopn8r's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Southern Ohio
I'm sure if you paid 3 Times you'll get a prompt refund! :P They are good people.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 10:40 AM
  #6  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Your all good brandon, only one order went through
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #7  
krazycobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-20-08
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
From: Lacombe, AB
I am running the OTT heat exchanger and the stock one!!! love it too
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 02:49 AM
  #8  
tdipowered's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-06-08
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Kearney, MO
make him pay!!!!! just kidding i have the old design h/e from OTT and I WUV it!!!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 09:39 AM
  #9  
flash13brandon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: Brandon, Florida
I hope this doesn't turn into the epic 1 h/e vs 2 lol...by the way, 1 h/e FTW
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #10  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by flash13brandon
I hope this doesn't turn into the epic 1 h/e vs 2 lol...by the way, 1 h/e FTW
Why?

More coolant, better cooling..

Didnt you just have a problem with installing them inline?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #11  
flash13brandon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: Brandon, Florida
Originally Posted by ShortStack
Why?

More coolant, better cooling..

Didnt you just have a problem with installing them inline?
....I never tried to install them inline...Hungryhip did a test and found that cooling was better with just one, I don't think there is much of a difference because the stock one does not hold that much anyways.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 10:36 AM
  #12  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
I was just messin man haha...

Really? yea i guess it does seem really small.. Ill have to look up those tests.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 10:41 AM
  #13  
invisible's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-22-06
Posts: 7,591
Likes: 1
From: In a house.
Originally Posted by flash13brandon
....I never tried to install them inline...Hungryhip did a test and found that cooling was better with just one, I don't think there is much of a difference because the stock one does not hold that much anyways.
It still runs through both of them so it gets cooled twice.....
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 10:43 AM
  #14  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
Thats what id think.. and i mean.. i know its not that much more coolant, but it is more.. i just dont see how it would work out that way..

i guess im gonna go do some el-searcho
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 10:47 AM
  #15  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
The reason you have better cooling with one over two is location. Look at where the stock h/e is, true you will have more coolant no doubt, but that coolant will be hotter in the stock location becuase of lack of airflow and its relation to operating temps. So your just having that second h/e cool down coolant that would not have been that hot in the first place. Also if you run one that is large enough it would make up for the capacity of two
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #16  
flash13brandon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
From: Brandon, Florida
Thank you. I knew there was a rason behind it. lol
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #17  
OriGinaL Condo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 03-27-08
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Linden, New Jersey
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
The reason you have better cooling with one over two is location. Look at where the stock h/e is, true you will have more coolant no doubt, but that coolant will be hotter in the stock location becuase of lack of airflow and its relation to operating temps. So your just having that second h/e cool down coolant that would not have been that hot in the first place. Also if you run one that is large enough it would make up for the capacity of two
So would you recommend running a single H/E or inline with the new one you guys are producing?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 12:04 PM
  #18  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Either way will work, some people perfer to leave it in for a little easier of a install. I would say if you could though take it out
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #19  
sput's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-20-07
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: MN
Here's my story:

I bought the cx racing H/E from OTTP last summer. When I hooked it up initially, I ran it inline with my stock H/E. I did not see a drastic drop in temps so I capped the stock H/E and ran the cx racing H/E alone and I saw slightly cooler temps in that configuration.

Also note - I was very happy with the service and quality of product that I got from OTTP. Thanks again!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 12:26 PM
  #20  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Thanks for posting
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 10:04 PM
  #21  
wtpcobaltss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 01-25-08
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: bowling green ky
damnit and i just installed the stock one back up because i bought the new ott stage 1 and was figuring that it would help with cooling. i still believe it would be better.....more coolant more fins to disipate heat and yea the stock one might be in a not so good location but if gm engineered it to be there for cooling.. then obviously its cooling... then once it runs out the stock and into the front mount it should get even cooler. just my 2 cents.. but im still a noob.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #22  
rollingboostedss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-09-06
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
see I don't know why you would want to have two h/e what are you going to cool coolant twice or something, now I see what you could be saying about more coolant but A. isn't cx h/e bigger then stock if not maybe more efficient in flow. B. having more coolant what’s the point the car is only going to use what it needs why have even more.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 12:35 AM
  #23  
hungryhip-ccp's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 05-31-07
Posts: 4,339
Likes: 0
From: SoCal, Lancaster
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
The reason you have better cooling with one over two is location. Look at where the stock h/e is, true you will have more coolant no doubt, but that coolant will be hotter in the stock location becuase of lack of airflow and its relation to operating temps. So your just having that second h/e cool down coolant that would not have been that hot in the first place. Also if you run one that is large enough it would make up for the capacity of two
What he said. ^

old thread but im searching around for the rad coolant capacity on lsj
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 12:37 AM
  #24  
troyss's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 08-24-08
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
I'm running the CX racing and the stock HE also..
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 04:45 AM
  #25  
Zach06CobaltSC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by rollingboostedss
see I don't know why you would want to have two h/e what are you going to cool coolant twice or something, now I see what you could be saying about more coolant but A. isn't cx h/e bigger then stock if not maybe more efficient in flow. B. having more coolant what’s the point the car is only going to use what it needs why have even more.
Think about it like this. Take a pot and put 2 cups of water in it and set it on the stove on high. Then take another pot and put 8 cups of water in it and set it on high. Tell me which boils first? It goes back to the basics man, it takes longer to heat up more liquid then less. Running a 2nd heat exchanger or a bigger heat exchanger gives us more coolant, the more coolant the less it heats up, the less it heats up the lower our iat2's will be. Another way to look at it is how much of the coolant is used before it is being circulated back through, meaning if you only had say half of your intercooler system filled, your iat2's would be drastically higher because you are circulating that fluid through many many times. It's really late, but hopefully some of my logic makes sense to you guys =D.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
cw383
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
12
Sep 30, 2015 12:41 AM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM
jmelton327
Drivetrain
2
Sep 26, 2015 10:04 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 AM.