2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

First dipstick now Oil Cap! WTF!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 04:10 PM
  #26  
tityrous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-04-05
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Raymond NH
sux that another one blew up...
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #27  
06noscobaltss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-06
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
I just want to know what the benefit would be if I went with a higher compression ratio or a lower one? Can anyone explain what I should go with and what are the positives and negatives of going higher or lower.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 06:49 PM
  #28  
3fo893013L's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 06noscobaltss
I just want to know what the benefit would be if I went with a higher compression ratio or a lower one? Can anyone explain what I should go with and what are the positives and negatives of going higher or lower.
the higher compression often leaves little room to run more boost if that's your goal although this statement is not completely true in most cases..

If you plan on building stronger and want to keep boosting higher levels keep the stock compression ratio but go for stronger rods and pistons..
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #29  
SS4ME's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
Originally Posted by sneaky
the higher compression often leaves little room to run more boost if that's your goal although this statement is not completely true in most cases..

If you plan on building stronger and want to keep boosting higher levels keep the stock compression ratio but go for stronger rods and pistons..
I'm not 100% sure but isn't it the opposite? With higher compression wouldn't you want to run lower boost?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #30  
3fo893013L's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SS4ME
I'm not 100% sure but isn't it the opposite? With higher compression wouldn't you want to run lower boost?
i've seen some crazy **** over the years where people use a 10:x:x /11:x:x ratio and boost the **** out of it and no problems while others depending on car/motor cannot run more then 5-10PSI on higher compression.

General rule of thumb is to keep stock compression on factory boosted cars but find ways to strengthen without comprimsing performance and motor.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 08:58 PM
  #31  
handyjoe's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-30-06
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, IL
Originally Posted by SS4ME
I'm not 100% sure but isn't it the opposite? With higher compression wouldn't you want to run lower boost?
You can still run more boost, you just have to do the engine right.

What I think he was trying to say is that there is little room for error.

Generally higher compression = more power, but also = more stress on engine.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:35 PM
  #32  
06noscobaltss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-06
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
Ok I think I am just going to go with MAHLE forged pistons in either their 8.5:1 or stock which is 9.5:1. I do not want to go up in compression because I already run 20+ psi on the blower and will soon be going to HAHN for an All turbo kit for 20+ psi!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarrenGC
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
18
Dec 24, 2021 01:55 PM
717ssbalt
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
9
Oct 2, 2015 04:01 PM
importkiller
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Sep 30, 2015 07:18 PM
dennis69
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
5
Sep 28, 2015 02:16 PM
SlowSaturn
Drivetrain
0
Sep 28, 2015 11:03 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 AM.