2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Flow calculation for some LSJ parts.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-2007, 12:33 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So let get this a sticky !
Old 08-05-2007, 10:43 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Jmc007
So let get this a sticky !
Dude I am pimpn the **** out of this info! I wish I had it earlier. I would have not waisted my money on a GMPP Manifold. I have a flow goal of 425-450 CFM. I could have gotten away with the stock manifold and just replaced my dp and cat-back with a 2.5" system.

I guess the extra 25 CFM will be worth it in the long run. But for immidate gains I wish I would have started with the cat-back.
Old 08-06-2007, 11:42 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ebristol
Dude I am pimpn the **** out of this info! I wish I had it earlier. I would have not waisted my money on a GMPP Manifold. I have a flow goal of 425-450 CFM. I could have gotten away with the stock manifold and just replaced my dp and cat-back with a 2.5" system.

I guess the extra 25 CFM will be worth it in the long run. But for immidate gains I wish I would have started with the cat-back.
Yeah it's the same for me. If i had known this info a long time ago, I would have save a lot of money ...
Old 09-03-2007, 09:50 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Bump for sticky. This is the first exhaust thread people should read.
Old 09-04-2007, 07:20 PM
  #30  
New Member
 
LightngBalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-19-06
Location: Way upstate
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jmc007
Hi ! Here are my flow calculation for some LSJ engine parts :

Stock Cat-back Exhaust (2,5" inlet to 2,25" outlet with stock muffler) : 300 CFM.

Now here are some replacement parts :

Stock catback with only the rear muffler replaced (the last portion is still in 2,25" tubing) : 350 CFM.

Hope this can help ...

Regards )
So, can we assume from this, that the GM exhausts, and the Borla, (all 3 are 2.25") are only good for 300-350 cfm? And if so, at what HP level do they start to be the restriction and you really need to step up to a 2.5"-3" setup?
Old 09-04-2007, 09:18 PM
  #31  
New Member
 
bl0wnbalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-30-07
Location: irb, fl
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good post, ive been looking for flow numbers

i have a question for you, how much cfm does our blower push at what pully sizes?


+rep
Old 09-04-2007, 10:15 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stock M62 blower with the stock pulley pushes around twice the CFM of what the stock LSJ motor can "ingests".
Old 09-04-2007, 10:23 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
pjk91's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: San Pedro/PV
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wish we could get some flow numbers for the LE5 then.
Old 09-04-2007, 10:25 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post #1 Edited.
Old 02-18-2008, 07:09 PM
  #35  
n8g
Member
 
n8g's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-07
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LightngBalt
So, can we assume from this, that the GM exhausts, and the Borla, (all 3 are 2.25") are only good for 300-350 cfm? And if so, at what HP level do they start to be the restriction and you really need to step up to a 2.5"-3" setup?
The GMPP catbacks flow more than 300 cfm due to the fact people see an increase in power. Anyone have the info on the cfm to back up my proposterous claim?

Last edited by n8g; 02-18-2008 at 07:09 PM. Reason: William Shatner said so.
Old 08-31-2011, 11:38 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jmc007's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-05
Location: Quebec City, Quebec
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sticky ...

Can we please get this stickied somewhere ...
Old 08-31-2011, 11:59 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafydialupking's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-29-10
Location: NH
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jmc007
The stock M62 blower with the stock pulley pushes around twice the CFM of what the stock LSJ motor can "ingests".
Which is why if the blower was 100% efficient you would see 14.7 psi on the stock pulley but due to the nature of the roots blower loosing some boost pressure between the rotors as they mesh you guys get like 12ish right?

I'd like to see the flow numbers on the intake manifold with the stock laminova port size, 15mm and 18mm.
Old 02-17-2012, 02:31 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jgarciarivera's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-06
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adding this info to my research.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
12-11-2022 04:47 PM
06MetallicBalt
Mid East
9
08-17-2021 03:40 PM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
01-12-2016 12:01 AM
no_ss
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
10-18-2015 11:58 PM
goaliemo
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
09-28-2015 01:37 PM



Quick Reply: Flow calculation for some LSJ parts.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 AM.