2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

GM stage kits or not!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2008, 09:49 PM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
ChargedBalt06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-20-08
Location: Indiana
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GM stage kits or not!?

so just a quick question... i have the money to put the gm stage II. Would you recommend goin with gm superchargers of actually going with another aftermarket kit like cobalt addiction has!? Thanks
Old 05-14-2008, 09:51 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
PimpLay2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-29-08
Location: Pittsburgh to D.C.
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stage 2 if you want warranty
Old 05-14-2008, 09:52 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
MfZx25z's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-05-08
Location: Philly, Pa
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
go custom, cheaper and more power
Old 05-14-2008, 10:00 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
eastcoastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-05
Location: Jackson, nj
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love the full GM Stage 3 and 2.9 pulley! The 100 octane mode is GREAT!
Old 05-14-2008, 10:01 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
boostedss26's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-02-05
Location: Rhinelander WI
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
save a little more and get the gm stage 3
Old 05-14-2008, 10:29 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
ralliartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
waste of money if you ask me. check this thread out. that's my car (cooling mods, tune, cutout) vs a stage 2 car with 2.8 and i/dp/e. I haven't even started adding bolt ons yet. Just imagine when I do. Hell, Imagine when I add a 2.8 pulley!

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/pictures-videos-64/old-modding-way-vs-new-modding-way-111934/

the reason I think it's a wast of money is for 2 reasons.

1. no cooling mods first, so with the smaller pulley and stuff, you are creating quite a bit of heat. Heat means the car is less reliable and robs power.

2. gm tunes are shitty.
Old 05-14-2008, 10:55 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
eastcoastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-05
Location: Jackson, nj
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will agree with you on that I had GM S2 with a 2.8 pulley it was much slower them friends 2.6, 60lbinj, and custome tune, BUT my new setup is GM S3 with a 2.9 and I stay ahead of him now. NO NITROUS
Old 05-14-2008, 10:59 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
SSRedSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-08
Location: Where you live
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ralliartist
waste of money if you ask me. check this thread out. that's my car (cooling mods, tune, cutout) vs a stage 2 car with 2.8 and i/dp/e. I haven't even started adding bolt ons yet. Just imagine when I do. Hell, Imagine when I add a 2.8 pulley!

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=111934

the reason I think it's a wast of money is for 2 reasons.

1. no cooling mods first, so with the smaller pulley and stuff, you are creating quite a bit of heat. Heat means the car is less reliable and robs power.

2. gm tunes are shitty.
Why dont you just get a 2.8 then.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
ineedacobaltss
Parts
16
11-07-2015 02:25 PM
dennis69
Appearance
9
10-20-2015 04:49 PM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
09-30-2015 07:12 PM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
09-28-2015 12:51 PM



Quick Reply: GM stage kits or not!?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 AM.