2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

GM stage kits or not!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #1  
ChargedBalt06's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 03-20-08
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
GM stage kits or not!?

so just a quick question... i have the money to put the gm stage II. Would you recommend goin with gm superchargers of actually going with another aftermarket kit like cobalt addiction has!? Thanks
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #2  
PimpLay2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 2,681
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh to D.C.
stage 2 if you want warranty
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #3  
MfZx25z's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-05-08
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Pa
go custom, cheaper and more power
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
eastcoastz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-22-05
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, nj
I love the full GM Stage 3 and 2.9 pulley! The 100 octane mode is GREAT!
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #5  
boostedss26's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-02-05
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
From: Rhinelander WI
save a little more and get the gm stage 3
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 10:29 PM
  #6  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
waste of money if you ask me. check this thread out. that's my car (cooling mods, tune, cutout) vs a stage 2 car with 2.8 and i/dp/e. I haven't even started adding bolt ons yet. Just imagine when I do. Hell, Imagine when I add a 2.8 pulley!

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/pictures-videos-64/old-modding-way-vs-new-modding-way-111934/

the reason I think it's a wast of money is for 2 reasons.

1. no cooling mods first, so with the smaller pulley and stuff, you are creating quite a bit of heat. Heat means the car is less reliable and robs power.

2. gm tunes are shitty.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #7  
eastcoastz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-22-05
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, nj
I will agree with you on that I had GM S2 with a 2.8 pulley it was much slower them friends 2.6, 60lbinj, and custome tune, BUT my new setup is GM S3 with a 2.9 and I stay ahead of him now. NO NITROUS
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #8  
SSRedSC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-04-08
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: Where you live
Originally Posted by ralliartist
waste of money if you ask me. check this thread out. that's my car (cooling mods, tune, cutout) vs a stage 2 car with 2.8 and i/dp/e. I haven't even started adding bolt ons yet. Just imagine when I do. Hell, Imagine when I add a 2.8 pulley!

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=111934

the reason I think it's a wast of money is for 2 reasons.

1. no cooling mods first, so with the smaller pulley and stuff, you are creating quite a bit of heat. Heat means the car is less reliable and robs power.

2. gm tunes are shitty.
Why dont you just get a 2.8 then.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
ineedacobaltss
Parts
16
Nov 7, 2015 02:25 PM
dennis69
Appearance
9
Oct 20, 2015 04:49 PM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.