2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Hahn Racecraft LSJ GT35R Turbo Project PICS RELEASED!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:10 AM
  #776  
06noscobaltss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-06
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
Originally Posted by 2K5SS/SC?
Damn you and your WOOT! That's was just wrong because now I know you have some good numbers of some sort!
MaYbE?!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:22 AM
  #777  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Originally Posted by 06noscobaltss
MaYbE?!
Is not nice to mess around with a guy that gets paid to play with explosives! I want numbers right MEOW!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:28 AM
  #778  
06noscobaltss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-06
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
Originally Posted by 2K5SS/SC?
Is not nice to mess around with a guy that gets paid to play with explosives! I want numbers right MEOW!
Sorry, I have to wait just like all of you have to wait. Bill has numbers, but will not tell me! haha cause he knows Ill spill all the beans! Id say we are going to wait on saying numbers until the big meet on Sat and just let everyone have it then! Sucks you wont be here!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:37 AM
  #779  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Originally Posted by 06noscobaltss
Sorry, I have to wait just like all of you have to wait. Bill has numbers, but will not tell me! haha cause he knows Ill spill all the beans! Id say we are going to wait on saying numbers until the big meet on Sat and just let everyone have it then! Sucks you wont be here!
Damn you scooba steve! That's cool. Once they are released please drop a line on here for me to see. That is all I ask. I will go play in the 100*+ weather now in the sand until then.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:03 AM
  #780  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by 2K5SS/SC?
Is not nice to mess around with a guy that gets paid to play with explosives! I want numbers right MEOW!
I will say that I envy your know how/ability/opportunity to blow **** up. That's right up there with race cars in my book.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:14 AM
  #781  
mikess06's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-24-06
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Philly
so how much is this system looking at ?? lol sorry guys if this has been already talked about i'm being lazy and looking for a quick answer
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 05:02 AM
  #782  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Originally Posted by victory_red_SS
I will say that I envy your know how/ability/opportunity to blow **** up. That's right up there with race cars in my book.
It is cool coming up with new ways to destroy ****! We got bored after a ton of demo shots in Afghanistan, so I started taking flare pods from aircraft crashes and putting them un top of my shots. The shot would blow with a huge fireball, and then flares would burst out of the top of it! Plus, you still get to feel the kick from the bang. Way better than the 4th of July IMO.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #783  
06noscobaltss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-06
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
Going up to Hahn Racecraft tonight to get some videos of it on the dyno... Some with pump gas for sure... MAYBE some others with 100 octane? WOOT! Then some videos of it street driving with prob no traction! Stay Tuned!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 05:43 PM
  #784  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
I want t3h 20g...
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #785  
bolus's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 02-28-07
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Im hoping my 20g kit (partial, no intercooler or charge tubing) will be waiting for me when I get home tonight.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #786  
memphisr24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-05
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 1
From: Rutherford, NJ
I say....540 whp
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #787  
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-05
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
From: South Bend , Indiana
Originally Posted by 06noscobaltss
Going up to Hahn Racecraft tonight to get some videos of it on the dyno... Some with pump gas for sure... MAYBE some others with 100 octane? WOOT! Then some videos of it street driving with prob no traction! Stay Tuned!
Damnit , I wish I could make it to the midwest meet
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #788  
Smarty Art's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-29-06
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania, Greensburg
I want the Super 20G NOW!!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #789  
ptrblkz24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
From: mt kisco,ny
Originally Posted by Smarty Art
I want the Super 20G NOW!!!!!
Tell me about it! I have a super 20g infront of me.I just need some motivation to install it.

Hey Bill,
Do you have a time frame for when your releasing the 20g kit?Ive been waiting for it since last summer,lol.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #790  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
what type of dyno?

if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 650-680

flow numbers govern this by law-o-physics.

stock head at 580CFM Xmax13% gain with JBP head = 655CFM

useing the lowest agreed number for cfm per HP 1.4cfm/1hp

655 / 1.4 = 468.

adjust the flow numbers for the boost (20psi)
28.5/15.5 = 1.8

655X1.8 = 1189

1189 / 1.6(more commonly used for power per CFM)=743

factor in lack of exhaust port flow contaminating the air charge, plus restrictions in the intake path, and lower air density with heat and you'll lose flow as well....so i'd say 650is tops.

re-did the math to 20psi (~28.5psi map) per my data logs and you should see a max flow potential as noted above.

Last edited by 06black; Apr 1, 2008 at 10:45 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #791  
SS SCHGD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-10-05
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: Dekalb, IL
It will be nice to see this car again, seems like it's been forever since the last time we saw it at a meet. (something like 2 yrs?)
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #792  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Originally Posted by 06black
what type of dyno?

if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 650-680

flow numbers govern this by law-o-physics.

stock head at 580CFM Xmax13% gain with JBP head = 655CFM

useing the lowest agreed number for cfm per HP 1.4cfm/1hp

655 / 1.4 = 468.

adjust the flow numbers for the boost (20psi)
28.5/15.5 = 1.8

655X1.8 = 1189

1189 / 1.6(more commonly used for power per CFM)=743

factor in lack of exhaust port flow contaminating the air charge, plus restrictions in the intake path, and lower air density with heat and you'll lose flow as well....so i'd say 650is tops.

re-did the math to 20psi (~28.5psi map) per my data logs and you should see a max flow potential as noted above.
using that equation the stock head could put down 414, thats good enough for my setup.

Last edited by jimbos'ss; Apr 1, 2008 at 10:53 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #793  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by jimbos'ss
using that equation the stock head could put down 414, thats good enough for my setup.

those numbers are are from flow tests at 7kpa, or about 15.5psi absolute.

with boost the numbers increase, but the exhasut side chokes down that number as well....plus a few other variables that will take away power.

but you should see the general idea.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #794  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Originally Posted by 06black
those numbers are are from flow tests at 7kpa, or about 15.5psi absolute.

with boost the numbers increase, but the exhasut side chokes down that number as well....plus a few other variables that will take away power.

but you should see the general idea.
so it's probably pretty close to the max we can make on the stock head though. which brings me to a question, our exhaust ports are f'n small, but i imagine that increases the exhaust velocity correct?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #795  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by jimbos'ss
so it's probably pretty close to the max we can make on the stock head though. which brings me to a question, our exhaust ports are f'n small, but i imagine that increases the exhaust velocity correct?
edit your last post with a quote of my updated post on the last page.

port velosity means jack friggin **** when compared to flow.

i'll gladdy lose 50% velocity for a 50CFM bump per cylinder.

turbos are 97% mass driven, not velocity.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #796  
06noscobaltss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-28-06
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
06Black
what type of dyno?

if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 470ish.


It is a Dynojet chassis dyno. Sorry but 470 is way low for race gas and high boost. I think you may have messed up some numbers..... But anyway, we will all find out soon!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #797  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by 06noscobaltss
Going up to Hahn Racecraft tonight to get some videos of it on the dyno... Some with pump gas for sure... MAYBE some others with 100 octane? WOOT! Then some videos of it street driving with prob no traction! Stay Tuned!
So Joe, that was yesterday. What were the results and where are the vids?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #798  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Originally Posted by 06black
edit your last post with a quote of my updated post on the last page.

port velosity means jack friggin **** when compared to flow.

i'll gladdy lose 50% velocity for a 50CFM bump per cylinder.

turbos are 97% mass driven, not velocity.
quote updated, bear with me on this one, i know jack sh** about exhaust flow in reference to how turbine will react. right now i polished the exhaust ports to reduce surface area and increace flow(understandably not much though). i'm just thinking with less surface area it will lose less heat in the head and there will be more exhaust expansion in the turbine. i'm probably on crack, but whats your thoughts?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 11:18 PM
  #799  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Patiently waiting for videos and still playing in the sand!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #800  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by 06noscobaltss
06Black
what type of dyno?

if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 470ish.


It is a Dynojet chassis dyno. Sorry but 470 is way low for race gas and high boost. I think you may have messed up some numbers..... But anyway, we will all find out soon!
see updated numbers per boost

Originally Posted by jimbos'ss
quote updated, bear with me on this one, i know jack sh** about exhaust flow in reference to how turbine will react. right now i polished the exhaust ports to reduce surface area and increace flow(understandably not much though). i'm just thinking with less surface area it will lose less heat in the head and there will be more exhaust expansion in the turbine. i'm probably on crack, but whats your thoughts?
meh, your thoughts are novel and on the rite track, but that polish is going to have a varrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry limited effect in the regard.

Last edited by 06black; Apr 1, 2008 at 11:21 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 PM.