Hahn Racecraft LSJ GT35R Turbo Project PICS RELEASED!
Sorry, I have to wait just like all of you have to wait. Bill has numbers, but will not tell me! haha cause he knows Ill spill all the beans! Id say we are going to wait on saying numbers until the big meet on Sat and just let everyone have it then! Sucks you wont be here!
Sorry, I have to wait just like all of you have to wait. Bill has numbers, but will not tell me! haha cause he knows Ill spill all the beans! Id say we are going to wait on saying numbers until the big meet on Sat and just let everyone have it then! Sucks you wont be here!
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Going up to Hahn Racecraft tonight to get some videos of it on the dyno... Some with pump gas for sure... MAYBE some others with 100 octane? WOOT! Then some videos of it street driving with prob no traction! Stay Tuned!
what type of dyno?
if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 650-680
flow numbers govern this by law-o-physics.
stock head at 580CFM Xmax13% gain with JBP head = 655CFM
useing the lowest agreed number for cfm per HP 1.4cfm/1hp
655 / 1.4 = 468.
adjust the flow numbers for the boost (20psi)
28.5/15.5 = 1.8
655X1.8 = 1189
1189 / 1.6(more commonly used for power per CFM)=743
factor in lack of exhaust port flow contaminating the air charge, plus restrictions in the intake path, and lower air density with heat and you'll lose flow as well....so i'd say 650is tops.
re-did the math to 20psi (~28.5psi map) per my data logs and you should see a max flow potential as noted above.
if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 650-680
flow numbers govern this by law-o-physics.
stock head at 580CFM Xmax13% gain with JBP head = 655CFM
useing the lowest agreed number for cfm per HP 1.4cfm/1hp
655 / 1.4 = 468.
adjust the flow numbers for the boost (20psi)
28.5/15.5 = 1.8
655X1.8 = 1189
1189 / 1.6(more commonly used for power per CFM)=743
factor in lack of exhaust port flow contaminating the air charge, plus restrictions in the intake path, and lower air density with heat and you'll lose flow as well....so i'd say 650is tops.
re-did the math to 20psi (~28.5psi map) per my data logs and you should see a max flow potential as noted above.
Last edited by 06black; Apr 1, 2008 at 10:45 PM.
what type of dyno?
if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 650-680
flow numbers govern this by law-o-physics.
stock head at 580CFM Xmax13% gain with JBP head = 655CFM
useing the lowest agreed number for cfm per HP 1.4cfm/1hp
655 / 1.4 = 468.
adjust the flow numbers for the boost (20psi)
28.5/15.5 = 1.8
655X1.8 = 1189
1189 / 1.6(more commonly used for power per CFM)=743
factor in lack of exhaust port flow contaminating the air charge, plus restrictions in the intake path, and lower air density with heat and you'll lose flow as well....so i'd say 650is tops.
re-did the math to 20psi (~28.5psi map) per my data logs and you should see a max flow potential as noted above.
if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 650-680
flow numbers govern this by law-o-physics.
stock head at 580CFM Xmax13% gain with JBP head = 655CFM
useing the lowest agreed number for cfm per HP 1.4cfm/1hp
655 / 1.4 = 468.
adjust the flow numbers for the boost (20psi)
28.5/15.5 = 1.8
655X1.8 = 1189
1189 / 1.6(more commonly used for power per CFM)=743
factor in lack of exhaust port flow contaminating the air charge, plus restrictions in the intake path, and lower air density with heat and you'll lose flow as well....so i'd say 650is tops.
re-did the math to 20psi (~28.5psi map) per my data logs and you should see a max flow potential as noted above.
Last edited by jimbos'ss; Apr 1, 2008 at 10:53 PM.
those numbers are are from flow tests at 7kpa, or about 15.5psi absolute.
with boost the numbers increase, but the exhasut side chokes down that number as well....plus a few other variables that will take away power.
but you should see the general idea.
so it's probably pretty close to the max we can make on the stock head though. which brings me to a question, our exhaust ports are f'n small, but i imagine that increases the exhaust velocity correct?
port velosity means jack friggin **** when compared to flow.
i'll gladdy lose 50% velocity for a 50CFM bump per cylinder.
turbos are 97% mass driven, not velocity.
06Black
what type of dyno?
if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 470ish.
It is a Dynojet chassis dyno. Sorry but 470 is way low for race gas and high boost. I think you may have messed up some numbers..... But anyway, we will all find out soon!
what type of dyno?
if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 470ish.
It is a Dynojet chassis dyno. Sorry but 470 is way low for race gas and high boost. I think you may have messed up some numbers..... But anyway, we will all find out soon!
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
So Joe, that was yesterday. What were the results and where are the vids?
quote updated, bear with me on this one, i know jack sh** about exhaust flow in reference to how turbine will react. right now i polished the exhaust ports to reduce surface area and increace flow(understandably not much though). i'm just thinking with less surface area it will lose less heat in the head and there will be more exhaust expansion in the turbine. i'm probably on crack, but whats your thoughts?
06Black
what type of dyno?
if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 470ish.
It is a Dynojet chassis dyno. Sorry but 470 is way low for race gas and high boost. I think you may have messed up some numbers..... But anyway, we will all find out soon!
what type of dyno?
if its a legit, load based unit (not load applied) thats got its SAE cert then i say a MAX of 470ish.
It is a Dynojet chassis dyno. Sorry but 470 is way low for race gas and high boost. I think you may have messed up some numbers..... But anyway, we will all find out soon!
quote updated, bear with me on this one, i know jack sh** about exhaust flow in reference to how turbine will react. right now i polished the exhaust ports to reduce surface area and increace flow(understandably not much though). i'm just thinking with less surface area it will lose less heat in the head and there will be more exhaust expansion in the turbine. i'm probably on crack, but whats your thoughts?
Last edited by 06black; Apr 1, 2008 at 11:21 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost




