2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Harrop Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 03:04 AM
  #51  
Zach06CobaltSC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
heat exchanger should be the cxracing one from www.ottperformance.com
Methanol should be the devils own kit from www.ottperformance.com
pulley should be nates 2.8inch
you dont need a pcm, you need a tune from tom =P
stage 2 axels + drag radials.

You wont make 320whp with the m62 without nitrous. Unless its on an inflated dyno that is a liar lol. No offense, and you probably won't make the 400whp with the tvs. But either way good luck.

WWW.OTTPERFORMANCE.COM IS A GREAT PLACE TO GET MODS!!

Edit - you can't go with a 2.5-2.8inch pulley on the TVS. The tvs uses a different pulley, you shouldnt drop below a 3.1

also, as far as the cams, don't go with zzp. ZZP has some good parts...like...spark plugs..and the twincharge kit, but there exhaust department has taken a dump lately and gmr cams are much better. Talk to area if you are serious about cams. He will thank me later for that =P.

Last edited by Zach06CobaltSC; Sep 1, 2008 at 03:04 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 03:14 AM
  #52  
XTC_916's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-08
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
I will make an aim tommarow it's getting late here in california. What kind of WHP is your set up producing??? by the way thanks for all the help.
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 03:19 AM
  #53  
Zach06CobaltSC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-09-08
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
I just changed my setup a little bit, but I will be back on the dyno tuesday or wednesday with numbers and a video. I will be VERY close to the 300mark so I am pretty excited.

No worries for the help mate, thats what I am here for. Feel free to aim me anytime tomorrow and we will catch up. I am going tvs or turbo or twincharged within the next couple weeks, so I will letcha know how that goes also.
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 11:48 AM
  #54  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
lol!

this thread is awesome
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #55  
07SCCobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-23-06
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
bump
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 10:12 AM
  #56  
ss-dom's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-06-11
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: laval
Originally Posted by XTC_916
Ok guys here's what I would like my set up to be like.

Intake: Injen Cold Air Intake
Header: JBP Vortex Header
Down Pipe: JBP
Catback Exhaust: Vibrant 3in exhaust with 4in tip
Cam: ZZP Cam
Heat exchanger: ??? (Need Advice)
Hatrickstu's Cooling kit.
Meth: ??? (Need Advice)
Fuel Injectors: #60
Pulley: 2.5-2.8
Harrop TVS Supercharger 1.3L
Return Style Fuel System
PCM: (Need Advice)
Exedy: Stage 3 cluth and light weight flywheel
AxleNeed advice)

Well thats all I got for now. The more I learn the more I will plan. I want to produce at least 400 WHP with the TVS. If I stay with the M62 I will shot for 320WHP
did you finish your setup because you have close to the same set up i wanted
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:07 AM
  #57  
TStone's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-21-11
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 7
From: Dayton, Ohio
ZZP also made over 400 on the m62.........
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:14 AM
  #58  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
y didnt you just pm the guy.....
instead of gravediggin
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:24 AM
  #59  
zfissette's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-10-11
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
zzp made 400 on a 2.4. they took a custom block, put a 2.4 crank in it and a 2.0 head on it. calling a factory crank a stroker is silly. its a stock 2.4 crank. when you put a 2.4 crank in an ecotec motor, its a 2.4. not a "2.0 stroker". the site dyno record atm is 303 for an m62 from ebristol. its said there are tons of higher m62 numbers but none are posted in the dyno section of this site. My advice is stick with a single provider. zzp has provided nearly everything for my 07sc and its fast as hell. keep in mind clutch when planning to go past stock power levels. the tvs needs port and polished head, cams and a top level exhaust to really shine. ive been getting my car ready for one for the past year. get every supporting mod first, then bolt on the big power adder.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:31 AM
  #60  
zfissette's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-10-11
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
then of course, go 80s and a ls4 tb, they are cheap and will provide more than the engine needs, which is exactly what you want. maxing out a set of injectors is not the way to go.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:39 AM
  #61  
FryLoch's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-18-07
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
With a fully built motor that has been bored, stroked, Cammed, High Compression pistons like 14-1 with a TVS I think north of 500 is completely attainable without nitrous and on pump gas.

If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.

Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!

IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:44 AM
  #62  
zfissette's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-10-11
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
go mp112
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 12:21 PM
  #63  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by FryLoch
With a fully built motor that has been bored, stroked, Cammed, High Compression pistons like 14-1 with a TVS I think north of 500 is completely attainable without nitrous and on pump gas.

If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.

Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!

IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.

you full of it dude
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 12:49 PM
  #64  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
lol all this pipedream talk for lawlz
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 12:56 PM
  #65  
zfissette's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-10-11
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
meh, its possible to hit huge numbers but to do it in a car that can be driven on the street? not so sure about that.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 06:50 PM
  #66  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by FryLoch
With a fully built motor that has been bored, stroked, Cammed, High Compression pistons like 14-1 with a TVS I think north of 500 is completely attainable without nitrous and on pump gas.

If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.

Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!

IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.
::facepalm::
yes, lets compare a massive efficient head to an lsj head. brilliant!

you're failing at math here young one.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 07:09 PM
  #67  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
isnt the honda a 2.4 as well?
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 09:02 PM
  #68  
FryLoch's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-18-07
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Area47
::facepalm::
yes, lets compare a massive efficient head to an lsj head. brilliant!

you're failing at math here young one.
Bored and stroked so were looking at 2.5l with a ported head and cams and 14-1 compression absofuckinlutely would make north of 500. ZZP has made 400 with that kind of setup on an M62, or at least it says that on their site under the engine section. Thanks
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 09:07 PM
  #69  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
Originally Posted by FryLoch
Bored and stroked so were looking at 2.5l with a ported head and cams and 14-1 compression absofuckinlutely would make north of 500. ZZP has made 400 with that kind of setup on an M62, or at least it says that on their site under the engine section. Thanks


Old Oct 23, 2011 | 09:50 PM
  #70  
BLue NoTe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 06-12-10
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Originally Posted by Area47
lol!

this thread is awesome
I know right
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 10:26 PM
  #71  
FryLoch's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 04-18-07
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Unless ZZP is lying which I really doubt it! If an M62 car make 400hp there is no reason why a TVS car can't make 500.

Cobalt & Ion ---> ZZ Performance

You dont see TVS builds making this kind of power because no one has done a build like I'm talking about.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 10:46 PM
  #72  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
Originally Posted by Omnigear


Originally Posted by FryLoch
Unless ZZP is lying which I really doubt it! If an M62 car make 400hp there is no reason why a TVS car can't make 500.

Cobalt & Ion ---> ZZ Performance

You dont see TVS builds making this kind of power because no one has done a build like I'm talking about.
because its not cost efficient.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:01 PM
  #73  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by FryLoch
Bored and stroked so were looking at 2.5l with a ported head and cams and 14-1 compression absofuckinlutely would make north of 500. ZZP has made 400 with that kind of setup on an M62, or at least it says that on their site under the engine section. Thanks
sure. keep living that little dream to make 500 on pump gas with 14.1:1 static compression.

dump 10k into a sc cobalt to make 500 hp
dump 4k into a turbo cobalt to make 500 hp.

hmmmmmmmmmmm

stock motor 500 hp vs built motor wound tighter cathaolic priests ******* on sunday.

gee, thats a hard choice
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:03 PM
  #74  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by freakta
isnt the honda a 2.4 as well?
the tsx is.
the rsx is a 2.0

the k20 has a massively efficient head design.
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 11:15 PM
  #75  
sjc0013's Avatar
Window Licker
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 03-19-09
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 2
From: Baltimore, MD
^ hey Brian just wanted to say thanks for your help with my tvs install hahaha. I have the polished one that used to be Eric's. The screw/hose mod is still holding up quite nicely



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.