Harrop Supercharger
09-01-2008, 03:04 AM
#51
Banned
Join Date: 03-09-08
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heat exchanger should be the cxracing one from www.ottperformance.com
Methanol should be the devils own kit from www.ottperformance.com
pulley should be nates 2.8inch
you dont need a pcm, you need a tune from tom =P
stage 2 axels + drag radials.
You wont make 320whp with the m62 without nitrous. Unless its on an inflated dyno that is a liar lol. No offense, and you probably won't make the 400whp with the tvs. But either way good luck.
WWW.OTTPERFORMANCE.COM IS A GREAT PLACE TO GET MODS!!
Edit - you can't go with a 2.5-2.8inch pulley on the TVS. The tvs uses a different pulley, you shouldnt drop below a 3.1
also, as far as the cams, don't go with zzp. ZZP has some good parts...like...spark plugs..and the twincharge kit, but there exhaust department has taken a dump lately and gmr cams are much better. Talk to area if you are serious about cams. He will thank me later for that =P.
Methanol should be the devils own kit from www.ottperformance.com
pulley should be nates 2.8inch
you dont need a pcm, you need a tune from tom =P
stage 2 axels + drag radials.
You wont make 320whp with the m62 without nitrous. Unless its on an inflated dyno that is a liar lol. No offense, and you probably won't make the 400whp with the tvs. But either way good luck.
WWW.OTTPERFORMANCE.COM IS A GREAT PLACE TO GET MODS!!
Edit - you can't go with a 2.5-2.8inch pulley on the TVS. The tvs uses a different pulley, you shouldnt drop below a 3.1
also, as far as the cams, don't go with zzp. ZZP has some good parts...like...spark plugs..and the twincharge kit, but there exhaust department has taken a dump lately and gmr cams are much better. Talk to area if you are serious about cams. He will thank me later for that =P.
Last edited by Zach06CobaltSC; 09-01-2008 at 03:04 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
09-01-2008, 03:19 AM
#53
Banned
Join Date: 03-09-08
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just changed my setup a little bit, but I will be back on the dyno tuesday or wednesday with numbers and a video. I will be VERY close to the 300mark so I am pretty excited.
No worries for the help mate, thats what I am here for. Feel free to aim me anytime tomorrow and we will catch up. I am going tvs or turbo or twincharged within the next couple weeks, so I will letcha know how that goes also.
No worries for the help mate, thats what I am here for. Feel free to aim me anytime tomorrow and we will catch up. I am going tvs or turbo or twincharged within the next couple weeks, so I will letcha know how that goes also.
10-23-2011, 10:12 AM
#56
New Member
Join Date: 05-06-11
Location: laval
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok guys here's what I would like my set up to be like.
Intake: Injen Cold Air Intake
Header: JBP Vortex Header
Down Pipe: JBP
Catback Exhaust: Vibrant 3in exhaust with 4in tip
Cam: ZZP Cam
Heat exchanger: ??? (Need Advice)
Hatrickstu's Cooling kit.
Meth: ??? (Need Advice)
Fuel Injectors: #60
Pulley: 2.5-2.8
Harrop TVS Supercharger 1.3L
Return Style Fuel System
PCM: (Need Advice)
Exedy: Stage 3 cluth and light weight flywheel
Axle
Need advice)
Well thats all I got for now. The more I learn the more I will plan. I want to produce at least 400 WHP with the TVS. If I stay with the M62 I will shot for 320WHP
Intake: Injen Cold Air Intake
Header: JBP Vortex Header
Down Pipe: JBP
Catback Exhaust: Vibrant 3in exhaust with 4in tip
Cam: ZZP Cam
Heat exchanger: ??? (Need Advice)
Hatrickstu's Cooling kit.
Meth: ??? (Need Advice)
Fuel Injectors: #60
Pulley: 2.5-2.8
Harrop TVS Supercharger 1.3L
Return Style Fuel System
PCM: (Need Advice)
Exedy: Stage 3 cluth and light weight flywheel
Axle
Need advice)Well thats all I got for now. The more I learn the more I will plan. I want to produce at least 400 WHP with the TVS. If I stay with the M62 I will shot for 320WHP
10-23-2011, 11:24 AM
#59
zzp made 400 on a 2.4. they took a custom block, put a 2.4 crank in it and a 2.0 head on it. calling a factory crank a stroker is silly. its a stock 2.4 crank. when you put a 2.4 crank in an ecotec motor, its a 2.4. not a "2.0 stroker". the site dyno record atm is 303 for an m62 from ebristol. its said there are tons of higher m62 numbers but none are posted in the dyno section of this site. My advice is stick with a single provider. zzp has provided nearly everything for my 07sc and its fast as hell. keep in mind clutch when planning to go past stock power levels. the tvs needs port and polished head, cams and a top level exhaust to really shine. ive been getting my car ready for one for the past year. get every supporting mod first, then bolt on the big power adder.
10-23-2011, 11:39 AM
#61
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: 04-18-07
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With a fully built motor that has been bored, stroked, Cammed, High Compression pistons like 14-1 with a TVS I think north of 500 is completely attainable without nitrous and on pump gas.
If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.
Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!
IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.
If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.
Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!
IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.
10-23-2011, 12:21 PM
#63
With a fully built motor that has been bored, stroked, Cammed, High Compression pistons like 14-1 with a TVS I think north of 500 is completely attainable without nitrous and on pump gas.
If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.
Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!
IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.
If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.
Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!
IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.
you full of it dude
10-23-2011, 06:50 PM
#66
Rent me! per hour
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
With a fully built motor that has been bored, stroked, Cammed, High Compression pistons like 14-1 with a TVS I think north of 500 is completely attainable without nitrous and on pump gas.
If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.
Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!
IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.
If supercharged K Series can make those kind of numbers there's no reason why a built LSJ can't.
Also this thread has been dead for a LONG LONG LONG time!
IMO I dont get why people keep putting TVS on a motor that is still stock! That's why no one ever really see's anymore than 350 with the TVS right now. Gimme a couple years and after I finish my 68 Mustang and I'll be building a TVS with more than 500.
yes, lets compare a massive efficient head to an lsj head. brilliant!
you're failing at math here young one.
10-23-2011, 09:02 PM
#68
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: 04-18-07
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bored and stroked so were looking at 2.5l with a ported head and cams and 14-1 compression absofuckinlutely would make north of 500. ZZP has made 400 with that kind of setup on an M62, or at least it says that on their site under the engine section. Thanks
10-23-2011, 10:26 PM
#71
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: 04-18-07
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless ZZP is lying which I really doubt it! If an M62 car make 400hp there is no reason why a TVS car can't make 500.
Cobalt & Ion ---> ZZ Performance
You dont see TVS builds making this kind of power because no one has done a build like I'm talking about.
Cobalt & Ion ---> ZZ Performance
You dont see TVS builds making this kind of power because no one has done a build like I'm talking about.
10-23-2011, 10:46 PM
#72
Unless ZZP is lying which I really doubt it! If an M62 car make 400hp there is no reason why a TVS car can't make 500.
Cobalt & Ion ---> ZZ Performance
You dont see TVS builds making this kind of power because no one has done a build like I'm talking about.
Cobalt & Ion ---> ZZ Performance
You dont see TVS builds making this kind of power because no one has done a build like I'm talking about.
10-23-2011, 11:01 PM
#73
Rent me! per hour
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
dump 10k into a sc cobalt to make 500 hp
dump 4k into a turbo cobalt to make 500 hp.
hmmmmmmmmmmm
stock motor 500 hp vs built motor wound tighter cathaolic priests ******* on sunday.
gee, thats a hard choice
