2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

How accurate are the performance #'s on the Interceptor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #1  
SSSlow's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 06-04-06
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
How accurate are the performance #'s on the Interceptor?

I just got my interceptor put in last week, and finally had a chance to do a few standing launches with the performance readings being taken. Got anywhere from a 14.68 @97 when I missed 3rd to a 14.11 @ 101 on my best run. I know that they're not going to be 100% accurate, but seeing as how I'm 4 hours from a full 1320 track and have to work weekends, I'm slightly boned on getting some real track times until at least next summer. I was just curious as to if some of you guys have run those when you were running on a timed track, and how the times compared?
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 03:34 PM
  #2  
roccityroller's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-27-06
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
depending on what you have done...that's about right
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #3  
ballerSS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-07-05
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I tried mine after getting stage 2 installed and got a 13.55 @ 106. I'll be going to the track this weekend and I'll use it and compare to the track times. I'll let you know.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #4  
ReMz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-24-06
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by ballerSS
I tried mine after getting stage 2 installed and got a 13.55 @ 106. I'll be going to the track this weekend and I'll use it and compare to the track times. I'll let you know.
nice... im interested to see how this turns out
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 01:44 AM
  #5  
SSSlow's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 06-04-06
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Originally Posted by roccityroller
depending on what you have done...that's about right
All I have right now is an ingall's stiffy and airbox mod. So, yeah...not sure. I mean, I know how to drive fairly well, so that may help, but I would be surprised if I was really running basically 14.0's stock. My peak HP #'s on the interceptor run about 225, and that seems a tad high stock too. I may have a beast from the factory, but I'd guess both those numbers are a little inflated.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #6  
mken's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: 02-23-05
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Florida
My peak HP #'s on the interceptor run about 225, and that seems a tad high stock too. I may have a beast from the factory, but I'd guess both those numbers are a little inflated.
I believe it calculates engine hp, not whp. Mine shows 282 hp

I've been getting low 14's at 104 mph pretty consistent using my interceptor, but my car is bogging bad in 1st and powershifting 1st to 2nd. I did notice my O2 sensor reading is all over the place, jumping around anywhere between 10 to 800 at any given time in any given condition. Don't know anything about tuning, but this concerns me, shouldn't it be a somewhat consistent number?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #7  
Canyon Cruiser's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: USA
I am glad to see the Ingalls Stiffy is helping with the 60 foot times. With forced induction anything that can be done to get power to the wheels for less than 200 bucks is a GREAT deal. I would recomend a tune to extract the most power possible, sometimes there is a lot of un-taped power waiting to be released
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #8  
R33P3R007's Avatar
360 L337 User
 
Joined: 08-11-05
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, Pa
Originally Posted by Canyon Cruiser
I am glad to see the Ingalls Stiffy is helping with the 60 foot times. With forced induction anything that can be done to get power to the wheels for less than 200 bucks is a GREAT deal. I would recomend a tune to extract the most power possible, sometimes there is a lot of un-taped power waiting to be released

my 60 fts got worse. and another person i know has had the same effect.

yes there is no wheelhop, but my 2.3 60's with wheel hop went to 2.5 2.6 all spinning.

but the gauge sounds pretty close. Mine is just about right on.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #9  
OniMirage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
i dont think the interceptor compensates for wheel spin so if you have any spin at all even a chirp it is going to be off by a good number or two but at the same time your on tougher road than that of the track so your traction will be better.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbochargedss2012
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
11
Sep 20, 2023 12:17 PM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.