An Idea: TVS with ZZP's 2.3L Stroker
Member
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
The only issue I see is that with the added cubes it would loose the ability to turn serious rpm's. This is why alot of evo guys take a 2.4 and destroke it to a 2 litre. Id say just build your motor with stock cubic inch port the head get cams and run a GT30R or a GT35R depending on how much horsepower youd like to make. Remeber ith any forced induction setup its all about moving mass amounts of air so a high boosted car with stock heads could be loosing a signifcant amount of horsepower.
Senior Member
Joined: 08-04-08
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
So then what should we be looking at? maby 9000 rpms? I can shim springs to get more seat pressure. I think I'm just trying my damndist to get freakta's car to break 400whp with a supercharger! I like the feel of the TVS. I've been in a turbo car and it feels like every other turbo car, fun for like 3000 rpms.
I need as many rpms as I can get. I will restructor his head intake runners to accomadate this airflow. The most work I spend on the LSJ is in the exhaust side! I'm going to try my hardest to squeeze every last bit out of this head! I just wanted to try something diffrent. But your right there is no valve spring yet that can handle these RPM'S!
I would recommend if your ganna use 60's to direct inject methonol! You will be able to better tune you engine with 60's.
With the 2.3 strocker I would assume 280-310 with your setup on pump gas...
Due head work, and at the minimum adjustable cam gears or get Zooomers cams his power band on the dyno sheet looked rediculous!
I need as many rpms as I can get. I will restructor his head intake runners to accomadate this airflow. The most work I spend on the LSJ is in the exhaust side! I'm going to try my hardest to squeeze every last bit out of this head! I just wanted to try something diffrent. But your right there is no valve spring yet that can handle these RPM'S!
I would recommend if your ganna use 60's to direct inject methonol! You will be able to better tune you engine with 60's.
With the 2.3 strocker I would assume 280-310 with your setup on pump gas...
Due head work, and at the minimum adjustable cam gears or get Zooomers cams his power band on the dyno sheet looked rediculous!
I think 330 is conservative with a TVS, I hit 298whp with massive spark blowout above 5500 and a unfinished tune. Keep in mind this is without the benefit of added displacement, ported head, upped compression, or upped rev ability. I think 350-400 is a more realistic expectation with a motor built.
Senior Member
Joined: 11-11-05
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, Ca
I believe the race prepped GM motors (2.2 turbo) spin to 9500.
Remember, GM destroked the 2.2 to accomodate more RPM's. I remember seeing the test results for the 2.2 while they increased horsepower from 200 to 1000+. I don't remember if the max was 1045 or 1400 though......
Remember, GM destroked the 2.2 to accomodate more RPM's. I remember seeing the test results for the 2.2 while they increased horsepower from 200 to 1000+. I don't remember if the max was 1045 or 1400 though......
when did my car get sucked intoall this talk of rpm and everythibg else. hahaha, its gonna be a fun trip, solid lifters would help the top end rev out a bit.
and for everyone say o build a honda, build a rotory, he has. he has built alot of stuff and we will succeed with this car too
and for everyone say o build a honda, build a rotory, he has. he has built alot of stuff and we will succeed with this car too
i dont think its a secret...i think they just havent finished a product that will be sold to the public yet... how can you release specs on something that hasnt been made yet?
Member
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Agreed its pointless to have useless rpms. It would mearly be just a bragging right and nothing more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post