2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

LSJ / LNF Difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #51  
cobalt_driver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-05-07
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
From: buffalo/ny
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Do what the turbo guys do when they max out their turbo... get a bigger compressor...
So that's what some of us are looking to do... HTV1320...
good call. i retract the statement. but i'll rephrase. turbos IMO have more options with max HP.

htv...harrop twin verticies? correct? isn't that what area, n raven have?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #52  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by cobalt_driver
good call. i retract the statement. but i'll rephrase. turbos IMO have more options with max HP.

htv...harrop twin verticies? correct? isn't that what area, n raven have?
True... for big HP, a turbo is generally a better choice.
Drive ability? Well... theres a reason I bought an LSJ over a GTI or skittles.

Yup... the HTV is the Harrop TVS. I know there are a few guys with them. Check out the HTV thread to see who they are.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #53  
cobaltstg2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-06
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: Indiana, Fort Wayne
either way you put it i would much rather have the instant boost thru the entire rpm then gobs of hp that you dont get till later... htv1320 is going to make that power instant with no lag . im not liking the whole dierect injection on the new cobalt if it wasnt for that iwould reconsider it but i guess i am going to be like the others here wait and see( i believe the lsj is going to come out on top)
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #54  
JPizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-28-06
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, fl
Originally Posted by cobaltstg2
either way you put it i would much rather have the instant boost thru the entire rpm then gobs of hp that you dont get till later... htv1320 is going to make that power instant with no lag . im not liking the whole dierect injection on the new cobalt if it wasnt for that iwould reconsider it but i guess i am going to be like the others here wait and see( i believe the lsj is going to come out on top)
Yea, the SS/TC will have lag... from idling RPM until 2,000 RPM.....
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #55  
R&C_rallySS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-06
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: PA
Alot of the post crack me up. Of course the LSJ was under rated from factory and I'm sure the LNF is also under rated. It is well known for Chevy and Dodge to under rate cars from factory for insureance reasons. Also its funny how people talk about turbo lag and bleh bleh. Anyone who knows their force induction knowns that talking about spool times is worthless. When it comes to small engines or 4 bangers turbo > supercharged
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 02:04 PM
  #56  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by cobalt_driver
good call. i retract the statement. but i'll rephrase. turbos IMO have more options with max HP.

htv...harrop twin verticies? correct? isn't that what area, n raven have?
i don't have the tvs blower. i have a box stock m62 on my car
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #57  
IonNinja's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-29-05
Posts: 7,915
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
LNF Rating = 260 hp / 260 ft-lbs
LSJ Rating = 205 hp / 200 ft-lbs

However based on numerous dynos, the LSJ's actual stock output is in the area of 255-270 hp, and 220-240 ft-lbs. So going off usual stock LSJ dynos its more like this...

LNF Rating = 260 hp / 260 ft-lbs
LSJ Rating = 265 hp / 230 ft-lbs

LNF has direct injection, VVT, and a turbo.
LSJ has standard electronic fuel injection, no VVT, and supercharger.

EDIT* If you look at the GM rating, it says 205 hp @ 5600 rpm. However just about EVERY LSJ stock dyno, peak power is made at the rev limiter or ~6500 rpm, hmmmm...
inflated #'s to make the LSJ look better

the LSJ makes 250 crank hp at best bone stock
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 02:59 PM
  #58  
LE5CAV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-12-07
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
From: SEWELL ,NJ
Originally Posted by JPizzle
Then why would Chevy underrate it?
ISURANCE

BRAGING RIGHTS ON WOUPING SRT-4s

STAY IN A LOWER CLASS
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #59  
Archie's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-23-07
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Stock was underrated... but the Stage kits seem to hit the money.
You will not be 300 with a stage kit... maybe 235-240. (edit: mustang dyno assumed)
Okay then according to Blown-4banger's numbers, you only get 10-15whp from stage 2. What the hell is the point of that? When you can just go and get intake and exhaust and be putting down more than that?

Also according to Blown's numbers, torque would be right around 195wtq stock and 210wtq with stage 2.

I'm just saying that 225whp is dynojet, and the 110-118 is mustange dyno, and people just said otherwise to boost their own egos.

Originally Posted by IonNinja
inflated #'s to make the LSJ look better

the LSJ makes 250 crank hp at best bone stock
Thank you.

Last edited by Archie; Mar 28, 2008 at 03:12 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #60  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by Archie
Okay then according to Blown-4banger's numbers, you only get 10-15whp from stage 2. What the hell is the point of that? When you can just go and get intake and exhaust and be putting down more than that?
An intake and full exhaust might get you the same, but;
intake and full exhaust - over $1200 before install
stage 2 - $500 before install... maybe...

BTW...
Knowledge of compressors > You

Of course you will only get 10-15 WHP from a stage 2.... the blower is past efficiency from factory. Spinning it harder is like pushing a turbo too far... heat heat heat and work work work!
As you may notice, as we go smaller in pulley sizes, we get less gains. It takes more power to turn the blower, and makes more heat. Simple engine fundamentals.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #61  
cobalt_driver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-05-07
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
From: buffalo/ny
Originally Posted by Omega_5
An intake and full exhaust might get you the same, but;
intake and full exhaust - over $1200 before install
stage 2 - $500 before install... maybe...

BTW...
Knowledge of compressors > You

Of course you will only get 10-15 WHP from a stage 2.... the blower is past efficiency from factory. Spinning it harder is like pushing a turbo too far... heat heat heat and work work work!
As you may notice, as we go smaller in pulley sizes, we get less gains. It takes more power to turn the blower, and makes more heat. Simple engine fundamentals.
true, hence #4

h/e's are your friends.

Originally Posted by Area47
i don't have the tvs blower. i have a box stock m62 on my car
*whisper* i thought u had a tvs? i can keep secrets... i won't tell.

Last edited by cobalt_driver; Mar 28, 2008 at 04:02 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #62  
Scythe_Snake's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-06
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 21
From: Matteson, Illinois
Originally Posted by JPizzle
Yea, the SS/TC will have lag... from idling RPM until 2,000 RPM.....
Again I say, it won't make its full power until the 3K range.

Originally Posted by R&C_rallySS
Alot of the post crack me up. Of course the LSJ was under rated from factory and I'm sure the LNF is also under rated. It is well known for Chevy and Dodge to under rate cars from factory for insureance reasons. Also its funny how people talk about turbo lag and bleh bleh. Anyone who knows their force induction knowns that talking about spool times is worthless. When it comes to small engines or 4 bangers turbo > supercharged
The LNF isn't though. Most people dyno in the correct areas. Its not a new engine. its been out for a while.

And again I say, it depends on the application and what you're wanting from the car. For overall power every time a turbo will out perform.

Last edited by Scythe_Snake; Mar 28, 2008 at 07:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #63  
Blown 4-banger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-06
Posts: 7,570
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by Area47
the lsj has beef injection

the lnf has twinkie cream infusion.

beef injection > twinkie cream infusion
Couldn't have said it better myself

Originally Posted by Scythe_Snake
Again I say, it won't make its full power until the 3K range.
Dude, the turbo on the LNF is so tiny, I bet they had to do something to keep it from spooling at idle

Last edited by Blown 4-banger; Mar 28, 2008 at 10:28 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 10:43 PM
  #64  
SSRedSC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-04-08
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: Where you live
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
Couldn't have said it better myself



Dude, the turbo on the LNF is so tiny, I bet they had to do something to keep it from spooling at idle
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 10:47 PM
  #65  
Scythe_Snake's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-06
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 21
From: Matteson, Illinois
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
Couldn't have said it better myself



Dude, the turbo on the LNF is so tiny, I bet they had to do something to keep it from spooling at idle
Yeah I know, i've eaten candy bigger than that thing, but I've driven a redline and it didn't feel like at 2K it made full boost. Felt closer to 3K
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
biniecki
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
Oct 25, 2015 02:23 PM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
ThoR294
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
4
Oct 4, 2015 08:44 PM
cw383
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
12
Sep 30, 2015 12:41 AM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 AM.