2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

my day at the dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #26  
ULWizSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-30-10
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Florence, NJ
Just had mine on the dyno today as well. Currently GM Stage 2, Injen Intake and 2.9 pulley from zzp. Car put down 244hp/225tq. Current best 1/4 is a 13.6@102.81 which was before the new ZZP Pulley was put on.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 05:11 PM
  #27  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by Joemaster70
man im hoping my car will put out what u got, im getting 2.9 42's and custom tune with no afr gauge so it's gonna be a long shot with the tune
not a good thing to do
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 05:13 PM
  #28  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by ziggity
0-56m
english please
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 09:58 PM
  #29  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
Originally Posted by Joemaster70
man im hoping my car will put out what u got, im getting 2.9 42's and custom tune with no afr gauge so it's gonna be a long shot with the tune
Who is tuning you without a wideband? Please dont touch the AFR unless you have one for the sake of your car
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 10:50 PM
  #30  
lsjion's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-31-06
Posts: 686
Likes: 4
From: troy oh
what many are missing is it made 25x on 16.5 deg timing. That's imprssive cinsidering there is plenty of leg room and meth intot the equation. mr x may have made this and that on a 2.9, BUT I'm sure that was on a complete tune and these numbers were also at 6500 rpm
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #31  
Karlen89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 09-28-06
Posts: 4,159
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, KS
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
not a good thing to do
Says the guy who put down barely more than I did on stage 2.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 01:14 AM
  #32  
Stone629's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 05-16-10
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by lsjion
what many are missing is it made 25x on 16.5 deg timing. That's imprssive cinsidering there is plenty of leg room and meth intot the equation. mr x may have made this and that on a 2.9, BUT I'm sure that was on a complete tune and these numbers were also at 6500 rpm
I noticed it. I made my power on 18 degrees of timing, so the OP's numbers are impressive. I'm thinking it was made on a cooled down engine.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 09:10 AM
  #33  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by Karlen89
Says the guy who put down barely more than I did on stage 2.
wow go ahead and im not done being tuned waiting on my alternator to get her
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 09:11 AM
  #34  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by Stone629
I noticed it. I made my power on 18 degrees of timing, so the OP's numbers are impressive. I'm thinking it was made on a cooled down engine.
5 min in between pulls so it wasent a cooled down engine
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 12:45 AM
  #35  
ziggity's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
english please
0-56 meters above sea level ... what else would m stand for? lol
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 01:31 AM
  #36  
Stone629's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 05-16-10
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
5 min in between pulls so it wasent a cooled down engine
Damn. Even more impressive considering it was dealing with all the heat. Get that car on a track and see what she'll do!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 09:22 AM
  #37  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by ziggity
0-56 meters above sea level ... what else would m stand for? lol
how far in feet
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #38  
ziggity's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
0-183 ft
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 07:15 PM
  #39  
Sizzle06's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-09-06
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 0
From: Sinton TX.
ported head
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 07:18 PM
  #40  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
yea lol
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #41  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
first post updated
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 10:46 PM
  #42  
383_Stroker's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 02-25-08
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
From: Murray, KY
Is 22* all you can get out of it, or is that just where you stopped? Take her on up to 25* if it'll take it
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 11:05 PM
  #43  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
flat timing curve kills top end.

12.0 afr on the dyno will end up being 13.x something on the street.

keep this in mind.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 11:30 PM
  #44  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
i will thank you
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 12:33 AM
  #45  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
Originally Posted by Area47
flat timing curve kills top end.

12.0 afr on the dyno will end up being 13.x something on the street.

keep this in mind.
eh? above .80 g/cyl I run flat timing... why's that bad?
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 12:43 AM
  #46  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
Originally Posted by Bika
eh? above .80 g/cyl I run flat timing... why's that bad?
Ramp it up. Mine starts at 23* at like 3k and works to 25.5* by 5600 or so and stays there to redline. shaunmcdee and area told me to ramp it like that and it feels much stronger on the top end
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 01:09 AM
  #47  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
not that i have any basis to question this, I just thought that id produce more power through out if i ran the most timing i could from like 3250 all the way up.
I will try ramping in the timing, but I suspect I will feel a slight loss of power in the mid range
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 01:28 AM
  #48  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
I always though the same thing until I tried it. And someone with some time on a dyno can most likely answer this better than me, but I didnt FEEL any midrange drop in power, although I could be wrong
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 01:36 AM
  #49  
Bika's Avatar
Fail Less.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-08-05
Posts: 5,677
Likes: 1
From: Brookfield
well I'm going to the dyno in 2 weeks so I will try this.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #50  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
sheet added
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.