Official Procharger Build Thread
07-20-2007, 07:11 PM
#551
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-20-05
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No one for sure has a dyno to prove it but im sure it would be a good +15whp increase with a litte loss of torque and you get one sick ass idle
Last edited by yellowcobaltss05; 07-20-2007 at 07:11 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
07-26-2007, 02:35 AM
#564
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-03-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This might be my favorite stupid post on the site.
07-26-2007, 09:09 AM
#566
Member
Join Date: 10-19-06
Location: Pequeno Havana
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-26-2007, 09:14 AM
#567
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-03-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-26-2007, 09:48 AM
#569
Banned
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why would you use turbocharged specs on a supercharged car? Do you know anything about cam profiles? It doesn't seem like it.
As for the M90. I didn't say it was better then a whipple or a turbo. All i said it was a "Cheaper" alternative that would give us good gains.
07-26-2007, 10:22 AM
#571
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-03-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wit,
Why would you use turbocharged specs on a supercharged car? Do you know anything about cam profiles? It doesn't seem like it.
As for the M90. I didn't say it was better then a whipple or a turbo. All i said it was a "Cheaper" alternative that would give us good gains.
Why would you use turbocharged specs on a supercharged car? Do you know anything about cam profiles? It doesn't seem like it.
As for the M90. I didn't say it was better then a whipple or a turbo. All i said it was a "Cheaper" alternative that would give us good gains.
If you want to debate cam specs in a civil manner feel free to take it to my cam thread instead of this one. You posted in the one on the redline forums over a month ago so I know you know which one it is.
07-26-2007, 10:33 AM
#572
I chose the grind that I did based on head flow, stock torque curve and intended engine redline. I don't say to a grinder, "hai gimme dose reel fast supacharga cams not dem slowar turbo onez."
If you want to debate cam specs in a civil manner feel free to take it to my cam thread instead of this one. You posted in the one on the redline forums over a month ago so I know you know which one it is.
If you want to debate cam specs in a civil manner feel free to take it to my cam thread instead of this one. You posted in the one on the redline forums over a month ago so I know you know which one it is.
i hate you for that link that song blows but it's stuck in my head
07-26-2007, 10:40 AM
#573
Banned
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Az
Posts: 5,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I chose the grind that I did based on head flow, stock torque curve and intended engine redline. I don't say to a grinder, "hai gimme dose reel fast supacharga cams not dem slowar turbo onez."
If you want to debate cam specs in a civil manner feel free to take it to my cam thread instead of this one. You posted in the one on the redline forums over a month ago so I know you know which one it is.
If you want to debate cam specs in a civil manner feel free to take it to my cam thread instead of this one. You posted in the one on the redline forums over a month ago so I know you know which one it is.
07-26-2007, 10:43 AM
#574
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-04-05
Location: mile high denver co
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Update...ChevyTech sent back the Mock up SC and it is a matter for getting the real head unit out and bolting her up! we are hoping in 2-3 weeks (not ChevyTech's fault as each head unit from procharger is made from scratch and tested before sending out) so ChevyTech called me last night and was going nuts and i know he is just an anxious then you guys i do know he made a statement that when it comes in he is going to worth through the night and take off work if he has to!
Also i did see the TS thread and it is very nice and clean setup...and we will be very excited to see how it holds up to the power output and cfm of the procharger...All i do know is it will be fun and should be good for the GM Sport Compact Community...
Also i did see the TS thread and it is very nice and clean setup...and we will be very excited to see how it holds up to the power output and cfm of the procharger...All i do know is it will be fun and should be good for the GM Sport Compact Community...
07-26-2007, 10:50 AM
#575
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-03-06
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rofl, I just now saw the ninja text.
Update...ChevyTech sent back the Mock up SC and it is a matter for getting the real head unit out and bolting her up! we are hoping in 2-3 weeks (not ChevyTech's fault as each head unit from procharger is made from scratch and tested before sending out) so ChevyTech called me last night and was going nuts and i know he is just an anxious then you guys i do know he made a statement that when it comes in he is going to worth through the night and take off work if he has to!
Also i did see the TS thread and it is very nice and clean setup...and we will be very excited to see how it holds up to the power output and cfm of the procharger...All i do know is it will be fun and should be good for the GM Sport Compact Community...
Also i did see the TS thread and it is very nice and clean setup...and we will be very excited to see how it holds up to the power output and cfm of the procharger...All i do know is it will be fun and should be good for the GM Sport Compact Community...
Last edited by Witt; 07-26-2007 at 10:50 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost